Factors that affect clinical youth engagement in digital mental health research: a qualitative sub-study nested within a prospective cohort study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Amanda Bye, Emma Wilson-Lemoine, Kylee Trevillion, Ben Carter, Rina Dutta
{"title":"Factors that affect clinical youth engagement in digital mental health research: a qualitative sub-study nested within a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Amanda Bye, Emma Wilson-Lemoine, Kylee Trevillion, Ben Carter, Rina Dutta","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02571-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been extensive debate about the role of social media and smartphone use in youth mental health and self-harm. Research to date lacks sufficient detail to determine the mechanisms underpinning any associations. The Social Media, Smartphone use and Self-harm in Young People (3S-YP) study is a prospective cohort study that was co-produced with young people to investigate temporal patterns of social media and smartphone use prior to an episode of self-harm in a clinical youth sample. Young people were actively involved in all key stages of the research process to ensure the research would be relevant and acceptable to the intended population. This included defining the research question and designing the methods. This qualitative sub-study nested within the main 3S-YP study aimed to evaluate young people's experiences of engaging in this innovative digital mental health study. This will help inform understanding regarding the added value of co-production and future research in this field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of participants from the 3S-YP study. Interview data was analysed using codebook thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen young people (mean 19.8 years old, SD 2.9; n = 10 female, 63%) participated in the interviews. Participants were generally comfortable answering questions about sensitive topics using remote digital tools, appreciating the greater privacy, convenience and opportunity for self-reflection they provide, whilst noting periods of poor mental health may affect study engagement. The remote research methods (including the participation information and tools for recruitment and data collection) were considered user-friendly and were complemented by the active role of the research team who facilitated young people's engagement with the study. Despite the relevance and support for research on the impact of digital technology use on youth mental health, concerns about data sharing and a complex process for accessing data from social media platforms complicated study engagement. The role of parental involvement was also described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>User-friendly remote research methods, coupled with proactive, responsive researchers and parental support are beneficial for conducting research with clinical youth populations. Whilst young people endorse research in this field, concerns about data sharing and barriers to data access need addressing if researchers are to effectively employ innovative solutions to investigating the impact of smartphones and social media use on youth mental health and self-harm. The findings from this study demonstrate the value of actively involving those with lived experience throughout the research process and provide useful insight for researchers intending to conduct similar research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID no. NCT04601220).</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02571-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been extensive debate about the role of social media and smartphone use in youth mental health and self-harm. Research to date lacks sufficient detail to determine the mechanisms underpinning any associations. The Social Media, Smartphone use and Self-harm in Young People (3S-YP) study is a prospective cohort study that was co-produced with young people to investigate temporal patterns of social media and smartphone use prior to an episode of self-harm in a clinical youth sample. Young people were actively involved in all key stages of the research process to ensure the research would be relevant and acceptable to the intended population. This included defining the research question and designing the methods. This qualitative sub-study nested within the main 3S-YP study aimed to evaluate young people's experiences of engaging in this innovative digital mental health study. This will help inform understanding regarding the added value of co-production and future research in this field.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of participants from the 3S-YP study. Interview data was analysed using codebook thematic analysis.

Results: Sixteen young people (mean 19.8 years old, SD 2.9; n = 10 female, 63%) participated in the interviews. Participants were generally comfortable answering questions about sensitive topics using remote digital tools, appreciating the greater privacy, convenience and opportunity for self-reflection they provide, whilst noting periods of poor mental health may affect study engagement. The remote research methods (including the participation information and tools for recruitment and data collection) were considered user-friendly and were complemented by the active role of the research team who facilitated young people's engagement with the study. Despite the relevance and support for research on the impact of digital technology use on youth mental health, concerns about data sharing and a complex process for accessing data from social media platforms complicated study engagement. The role of parental involvement was also described.

Conclusions: User-friendly remote research methods, coupled with proactive, responsive researchers and parental support are beneficial for conducting research with clinical youth populations. Whilst young people endorse research in this field, concerns about data sharing and barriers to data access need addressing if researchers are to effectively employ innovative solutions to investigating the impact of smartphones and social media use on youth mental health and self-harm. The findings from this study demonstrate the value of actively involving those with lived experience throughout the research process and provide useful insight for researchers intending to conduct similar research.

Trial registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID no. NCT04601220).

影响青少年临床参与数字心理健康研究的因素:一项前瞻性队列研究中的定性子研究
背景:关于社交媒体和智能手机使用在青少年心理健康和自我伤害中的作用,一直存在广泛的争论。迄今为止的研究缺乏足够的细节来确定任何关联背后的机制。社交媒体、智能手机使用和年轻人自残(3S-YP)研究是一项前瞻性队列研究,与年轻人共同开展,旨在调查临床青年样本中自残发作前社交媒体和智能手机使用的时间模式。年轻人积极参与研究过程的所有关键阶段,以确保研究对目标人群具有相关性和可接受性。这包括确定研究问题和设计方法。这个定性的子研究嵌套在主要的3S-YP研究中,旨在评估年轻人参与这个创新的数字心理健康研究的体验。这将有助于了解合作生产的附加价值和该领域未来的研究。方法:从3S-YP研究中选取有目的的参与者进行半结构化访谈。访谈数据采用代码本专题分析进行分析。结果:青年人16例(平均19.8岁,SD 2.9;N = 10名女性(63%)参与访谈。参与者一般都能自如地使用远程数字工具回答有关敏感话题的问题,他们欣赏这些工具提供的更大的隐私、便利和自我反思的机会,同时注意到心理健康状况不佳的时期可能会影响学习投入。远程研究方法(包括参与信息和招募和数据收集工具)被认为是用户友好的,并得到了研究小组的积极作用的补充,他们促进了年轻人参与研究。尽管对数字技术使用对青少年心理健康影响的研究具有相关性和支持,但对数据共享的担忧以及从社交媒体平台获取数据的复杂过程使学习参与变得复杂。文中还描述了父母参与的作用。结论:用户友好的远程研究方法,加上积极响应的研究人员和家长的支持,有利于在临床青年人群中开展研究。虽然年轻人支持这一领域的研究,但如果研究人员要有效地采用创新解决方案来调查智能手机和社交媒体使用对青少年心理健康和自我伤害的影响,就需要解决对数据共享和数据访问障碍的关切。这项研究的结果证明了在整个研究过程中积极参与有生活经验的人的价值,并为打算进行类似研究的研究人员提供了有用的见解。试验注册:本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov网站注册(ID:NCT04601220)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信