Biomarker profiling for infection diagnosis in emergency departments: A diagnostic study evaluating C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Club Cell Protein 16, interleukin-6, chitinase-like protein, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Rasmus Bruhn, Helene Skjøt-Arkil, Thor Aage Skovsted, Claus Lohman Brasen, Eline Sandvig Andersen, Anne Heltborg, Mathias Amdi Hertz, Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Christian Backer Mogensen, Antoni Torres, Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares
{"title":"Biomarker profiling for infection diagnosis in emergency departments: A diagnostic study evaluating C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Club Cell Protein 16, interleukin-6, chitinase-like protein, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor.","authors":"Rasmus Bruhn, Helene Skjøt-Arkil, Thor Aage Skovsted, Claus Lohman Brasen, Eline Sandvig Andersen, Anne Heltborg, Mathias Amdi Hertz, Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Christian Backer Mogensen, Antoni Torres, Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.110943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing infections in emergency departments (EDs) is vital for prompt and effective treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of six inflammatory biomarkers-CC16, CRP, IL-6, PCT, suPAR, and YKL-40-in ED patients with suspected infections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study. Adult patients suspected of infections at four Danish EDs were included. We measured biomarker levels at admission and analyzed their diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 966 patients, with 789 (81.7%) confirmed infections. CRP, IL-6, and PCT demonstrated the highest positive predictive values, recorded at 93% (95% CI, 91-95), 92% (95% CI, 90-94), and 91% (95% CI, 88-93), respectively. However, the negative predictive values of these markers were low, at 35.5 (95% CI, 30.8-40.5), 38.3 (95% CI, 32.5-44.3) and 34.2 (95% CI, 28.9-39.9) respectively at Youden Index. CRP, IL-6, and PCT were the most predictive, with CRP demonstrating an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. IL-6 and PCT showed similar levels of accuracy. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 displayed AUCs in the range of 0.53-0.64. CRP levels peaked three days after symptoms appeared, whereas PCT levels were highest upon symptom onset and admission. The influence of fever enhanced the sensitivity of IL-6 and PCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRP, IL-6, and PCT showed the best diagnostic accuracy among the biomarkers tested but are influenced by the timing of symptom onset and fever presence. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 had poor diagnostic accuracy and were considered poor discriminators. Overall, no single biomarker was sufficient to conclusively rule in or rule out infection. These findings support the need for nuanced interpretation when using biomarkers to diagnose infections in ED settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"110943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.110943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnosing infections in emergency departments (EDs) is vital for prompt and effective treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of six inflammatory biomarkers-CC16, CRP, IL-6, PCT, suPAR, and YKL-40-in ED patients with suspected infections.

Materials and methods: This was a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study. Adult patients suspected of infections at four Danish EDs were included. We measured biomarker levels at admission and analyzed their diagnostic performance.

Results: The study included 966 patients, with 789 (81.7%) confirmed infections. CRP, IL-6, and PCT demonstrated the highest positive predictive values, recorded at 93% (95% CI, 91-95), 92% (95% CI, 90-94), and 91% (95% CI, 88-93), respectively. However, the negative predictive values of these markers were low, at 35.5 (95% CI, 30.8-40.5), 38.3 (95% CI, 32.5-44.3) and 34.2 (95% CI, 28.9-39.9) respectively at Youden Index. CRP, IL-6, and PCT were the most predictive, with CRP demonstrating an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. IL-6 and PCT showed similar levels of accuracy. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 displayed AUCs in the range of 0.53-0.64. CRP levels peaked three days after symptoms appeared, whereas PCT levels were highest upon symptom onset and admission. The influence of fever enhanced the sensitivity of IL-6 and PCT.

Conclusion: CRP, IL-6, and PCT showed the best diagnostic accuracy among the biomarkers tested but are influenced by the timing of symptom onset and fever presence. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 had poor diagnostic accuracy and were considered poor discriminators. Overall, no single biomarker was sufficient to conclusively rule in or rule out infection. These findings support the need for nuanced interpretation when using biomarkers to diagnose infections in ED settings.

急诊感染诊断的生物标志物分析:一项评估c反应蛋白、降钙素原、俱乐部细胞蛋白16、白介素-6、几丁质酶样蛋白和可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体的诊断研究。
简介:在急诊科(EDs)诊断感染对及时有效的治疗至关重要。本研究评估了六种炎症生物标志物cc16、CRP、IL-6、PCT、suPAR和ykl -40在ED疑似感染患者中的诊断准确性。材料和方法:这是一项多中心诊断准确性研究。在四家丹麦急诊科怀疑感染的成年患者被纳入研究。我们测量了入院时的生物标志物水平,并分析了它们的诊断性能。结果:纳入966例患者,确诊感染789例(81.7%)。CRP、IL-6和PCT表现出最高的阳性预测值,分别为93% (95% CI, 91-95)、92% (95% CI, 90-94)和91% (95% CI, 88-93)。然而,这些指标的阴性预测值较低,约登指数分别为35.5 (95% CI, 30.8-40.5)、38.3 (95% CI, 32.5-44.3)和34.2 (95% CI, 28.9-39.9)。CRP、IL-6和PCT的预测能力最强,其中CRP的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.79。IL-6和PCT的准确度相近。CC16、suPAR和YKL-40的auc值在0.53 ~ 0.64之间。CRP水平在症状出现后3天达到峰值,而PCT水平在症状出现和入院时最高。结论:CRP、IL-6和PCT的诊断准确率最高,但受症状出现时间和发热的影响。CC16、suPAR和YKL-40的诊断准确性较差,被认为是较差的鉴别器。总体而言,没有单一的生物标志物足以最终确定是否存在感染。这些发现支持在使用生物标志物诊断ED感染时需要细致入微的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信