'I'm very open about it if people ask': Selective sharing, seeking community and careful censoring in women's epistemic practices surrounding childbirth experiences.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Pub Date : 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1177/13634593251332891
Lea Høj Høstrup, Lea Cordes, Julie Grøn Corneliussen, Jeanette Ørskov Pedersen, Kia Cecilie Korsgaard Sørensen, Nicole Thualagant, Katja Schrøder, Astrid Janssens
{"title":"'I'm very open about it if people ask': Selective sharing, seeking community and careful censoring in women's epistemic practices surrounding childbirth experiences.","authors":"Lea Høj Høstrup, Lea Cordes, Julie Grøn Corneliussen, Jeanette Ørskov Pedersen, Kia Cecilie Korsgaard Sørensen, Nicole Thualagant, Katja Schrøder, Astrid Janssens","doi":"10.1177/13634593251332891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study sought to explore which possibilities for voicing childbirth experiences women who have given birth experience having, and what types of knowledge they share in different social contexts. With an interpretative phenomenological analysis, conducted in collaboration between academic researchers and The Birthing Experience Panel, the study explores nine Danish women's accounts of articulating and sharing experiential childbirth knowledge. The analysis presents two main themes and six subthemes: (1) Women differentiate practices of voicing of their childbirth experiences by dosing details: by relational proximity, by listener's insight, and by the expertise of health professionals and (2) Women maneuver sharing experiential knowledge, through seeking community, considering countering experiences and careful censoring, differentiated by the childbirth experiences held by the listener. We lean on concepts from feminist epistemology as we discuss how individual epistemic practices rely on cultural perceptions of the value of experiential childbirth knowledge. The detailed understanding of how experiential childbirth knowledge is shared and valued in women's daily lives can contribute to broader discussions on efforts to build collective knowledge resources and include experiential knowledge in the organization of reproductive health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593251332891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251332891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study sought to explore which possibilities for voicing childbirth experiences women who have given birth experience having, and what types of knowledge they share in different social contexts. With an interpretative phenomenological analysis, conducted in collaboration between academic researchers and The Birthing Experience Panel, the study explores nine Danish women's accounts of articulating and sharing experiential childbirth knowledge. The analysis presents two main themes and six subthemes: (1) Women differentiate practices of voicing of their childbirth experiences by dosing details: by relational proximity, by listener's insight, and by the expertise of health professionals and (2) Women maneuver sharing experiential knowledge, through seeking community, considering countering experiences and careful censoring, differentiated by the childbirth experiences held by the listener. We lean on concepts from feminist epistemology as we discuss how individual epistemic practices rely on cultural perceptions of the value of experiential childbirth knowledge. The detailed understanding of how experiential childbirth knowledge is shared and valued in women's daily lives can contribute to broader discussions on efforts to build collective knowledge resources and include experiential knowledge in the organization of reproductive health care.

“如果有人问我,我会非常开放”:有选择地分享,寻求社区,仔细审查女性在分娩经历方面的认知实践。
本研究旨在探讨有生育经历的女性表达分娩经历的可能性,以及她们在不同的社会背景下分享的知识类型。通过学术研究人员和分娩经验小组合作进行的解释性现象学分析,该研究探讨了9名丹麦妇女阐述和分享分娩经验知识的情况。该分析提出了两个主要主题和六个副主题:(1)妇女通过给药细节来区分表达分娩经历的做法:通过关系接近、听者的洞察力和卫生专业人员的专业知识;(2)妇女通过寻求社区、考虑反对经验和仔细审查来分享经验知识,通过听者所拥有的分娩经验来区分。我们依靠女权主义认识论的概念,因为我们讨论了个人的认识论实践如何依赖于对经验分娩知识价值的文化观念。详细了解经验分娩知识如何在妇女日常生活中得到分享和重视,有助于更广泛地讨论建立集体知识资源的努力,并将经验知识纳入生殖保健的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health
Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信