'I'm very open about it if people ask': Selective sharing, seeking community and careful censoring in women's epistemic practices surrounding childbirth experiences.
IF 1.9 4区 医学Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lea Høj Høstrup, Lea Cordes, Julie Grøn Corneliussen, Jeanette Ørskov Pedersen, Kia Cecilie Korsgaard Sørensen, Nicole Thualagant, Katja Schrøder, Astrid Janssens
{"title":"'I'm very open about it if people ask': Selective sharing, seeking community and careful censoring in women's epistemic practices surrounding childbirth experiences.","authors":"Lea Høj Høstrup, Lea Cordes, Julie Grøn Corneliussen, Jeanette Ørskov Pedersen, Kia Cecilie Korsgaard Sørensen, Nicole Thualagant, Katja Schrøder, Astrid Janssens","doi":"10.1177/13634593251332891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study sought to explore which possibilities for voicing childbirth experiences women who have given birth experience having, and what types of knowledge they share in different social contexts. With an interpretative phenomenological analysis, conducted in collaboration between academic researchers and The Birthing Experience Panel, the study explores nine Danish women's accounts of articulating and sharing experiential childbirth knowledge. The analysis presents two main themes and six subthemes: (1) Women differentiate practices of voicing of their childbirth experiences by dosing details: by relational proximity, by listener's insight, and by the expertise of health professionals and (2) Women maneuver sharing experiential knowledge, through seeking community, considering countering experiences and careful censoring, differentiated by the childbirth experiences held by the listener. We lean on concepts from feminist epistemology as we discuss how individual epistemic practices rely on cultural perceptions of the value of experiential childbirth knowledge. The detailed understanding of how experiential childbirth knowledge is shared and valued in women's daily lives can contribute to broader discussions on efforts to build collective knowledge resources and include experiential knowledge in the organization of reproductive health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593251332891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593251332891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study sought to explore which possibilities for voicing childbirth experiences women who have given birth experience having, and what types of knowledge they share in different social contexts. With an interpretative phenomenological analysis, conducted in collaboration between academic researchers and The Birthing Experience Panel, the study explores nine Danish women's accounts of articulating and sharing experiential childbirth knowledge. The analysis presents two main themes and six subthemes: (1) Women differentiate practices of voicing of their childbirth experiences by dosing details: by relational proximity, by listener's insight, and by the expertise of health professionals and (2) Women maneuver sharing experiential knowledge, through seeking community, considering countering experiences and careful censoring, differentiated by the childbirth experiences held by the listener. We lean on concepts from feminist epistemology as we discuss how individual epistemic practices rely on cultural perceptions of the value of experiential childbirth knowledge. The detailed understanding of how experiential childbirth knowledge is shared and valued in women's daily lives can contribute to broader discussions on efforts to build collective knowledge resources and include experiential knowledge in the organization of reproductive health care.
期刊介绍:
Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.