The association between the cutaneous sensory block area, the surgical incision's location, and the block's analgesic efficacy: a post hoc sensitivity analysis of data from a controlled randomised multicentre trial.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Christopher Blom Salmonsen, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Jakob Kleif, Rasmus Krøijer, Lea Bruun, Martynas Mikalonis, Peter Dalsgaard, Karen Busk Hesseldal, Jon Emil Philip Olsson, Claus Anders Bertelsen
{"title":"The association between the cutaneous sensory block area, the surgical incision's location, and the block's analgesic efficacy: a post hoc sensitivity analysis of data from a controlled randomised multicentre trial.","authors":"Christopher Blom Salmonsen, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Jakob Kleif, Rasmus Krøijer, Lea Bruun, Martynas Mikalonis, Peter Dalsgaard, Karen Busk Hesseldal, Jon Emil Philip Olsson, Claus Anders Bertelsen","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11777-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transversus abdominis plane blocks are widely used, but the association between the cutaneous sensory block area and the analgesic effect is still debated. We aimed to determine the relationship between the cutaneous sensory block area, the surgical incision's location, and the block's analgesic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sensitivity analysis of data from a multicentre, patient-, clinician-, investigator-blinded, placebo- and active-controlled, 3-arm randomised clinical trial. Patients undergoing minimally invasive colon surgery were included from four hospitals across Denmark between January 2021 and February 2024. In this sensitivity analysis, we used our previously collected data of the cutaneous sensory block area to examine the efficacy of two different approaches to the transversus abdominis plane block, as compared to each other and placebo based on incision location. The primary outcome was total morphine dose equivalents administered in the first 24 h after minimally invasive surgery in patients receiving either a Pfannenstiel or a supraumbilical transverse incision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the subcostal dual laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block was superior to both the ultrasound-guided posterior transversus abdominis plane block and placebo in patients with a Pfannenstiel incision with an absolute difference of - 8.9 mg (95% CI, - 16.5 to - 1.3 mg; p = 0.02) and - 10.3 mg (95% CI, - 17.0 to - 3.6 mg; p < 0.01) morphine dose equivalents, respectively. No difference was found for the supraumbilical transverse incision. Patient-reported outcome measures favoured the laparoscopic-assisted block, with an absolute difference of 13 (95% CI, 1.7-24.3; p = 0.025) in the Quality of Recovery-15 score compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of the transversus abdominis plane block seems to be independent of the distribution of the cutaneous sensory block area of the approach. The laparoscopic-assisted subcostal transversus abdominis plane block reduced postoperative pain with a high QoR-15 score.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3883-3895"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11777-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transversus abdominis plane blocks are widely used, but the association between the cutaneous sensory block area and the analgesic effect is still debated. We aimed to determine the relationship between the cutaneous sensory block area, the surgical incision's location, and the block's analgesic efficacy.

Methods: A sensitivity analysis of data from a multicentre, patient-, clinician-, investigator-blinded, placebo- and active-controlled, 3-arm randomised clinical trial. Patients undergoing minimally invasive colon surgery were included from four hospitals across Denmark between January 2021 and February 2024. In this sensitivity analysis, we used our previously collected data of the cutaneous sensory block area to examine the efficacy of two different approaches to the transversus abdominis plane block, as compared to each other and placebo based on incision location. The primary outcome was total morphine dose equivalents administered in the first 24 h after minimally invasive surgery in patients receiving either a Pfannenstiel or a supraumbilical transverse incision.

Results: We found that the subcostal dual laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block was superior to both the ultrasound-guided posterior transversus abdominis plane block and placebo in patients with a Pfannenstiel incision with an absolute difference of - 8.9 mg (95% CI, - 16.5 to - 1.3 mg; p = 0.02) and - 10.3 mg (95% CI, - 17.0 to - 3.6 mg; p < 0.01) morphine dose equivalents, respectively. No difference was found for the supraumbilical transverse incision. Patient-reported outcome measures favoured the laparoscopic-assisted block, with an absolute difference of 13 (95% CI, 1.7-24.3; p = 0.025) in the Quality of Recovery-15 score compared to placebo.

Conclusion: The effect of the transversus abdominis plane block seems to be independent of the distribution of the cutaneous sensory block area of the approach. The laparoscopic-assisted subcostal transversus abdominis plane block reduced postoperative pain with a high QoR-15 score.

皮肤感觉阻滞区、手术切口位置和阻滞镇痛效果之间的关系:一项对照随机多中心试验数据的事后敏感性分析。
背景:腹横面阻滞被广泛应用,但皮肤感觉阻滞面积与镇痛效果之间的关系仍存在争议。我们的目的是确定皮肤感觉阻滞面积、手术切口位置和阻滞镇痛效果之间的关系。方法:对一项多中心、患者、临床医生、研究者双盲、安慰剂和主动对照、三组随机临床试验的数据进行敏感性分析。该研究纳入了2021年1月至2024年2月期间丹麦四家医院接受微创结肠手术的患者。在这个敏感性分析中,我们使用之前收集的皮肤感觉阻滞区域的数据来检查两种不同入路的腹横平面阻滞的疗效,并将其与基于切口位置的安慰剂相比较。主要结果是接受Pfannenstiel或脐上横切口的患者在微创手术后24小时内给予的总吗啡剂量当量。结果:我们发现肋下双腹腔镜辅助下的腹横平面阻滞在Pfannenstiel切口患者中优于超声引导下的后腹横平面阻滞和安慰剂,绝对差异为- 8.9 mg (95% CI, - 16.5至- 1.3 mg;p = 0.02)和10.3毫克(95%可信区间,17.0 - 3.6毫克;结论:腹横面阻滞的效果似乎与入路皮肤感觉阻滞区的分布无关。腹腔镜辅助肋下横腹平面阻滞减少了术后疼痛,QoR-15评分较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信