Effect of Ketamine Analgosedation on Neurological Outcome in patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sourav Burman, Rajendra Singh Chouhan, Niraj Kumar, Charu Mahajan
{"title":"Effect of Ketamine Analgosedation on Neurological Outcome in patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.","authors":"Sourav Burman, Rajendra Singh Chouhan, Niraj Kumar, Charu Mahajan","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02274-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the sedative and analgesic drugs used in patients with head injury cause a dose-dependent decrease in blood pressure, which may further worsen secondary neurologic injury. The sympathomimetic profile of ketamine, along with its neuroprotectant effect, can have a beneficial effect in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 60 adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury were randomized to receive either ketamine infusion at 3 mg/kg/h or normal saline. The study drugs were given by infusion while intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring was going on. Systemic hemodynamics, arterial blood gas values, ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and jugular venous oxygen saturation were monitored. At the end of 3 months, neurological outcome was recorded by an independent observer using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline values of hemodynamic parameters were comparable in the two groups. In the initial 4-6 h, patients in the ketamine group had a significantly higher level of blood pressure and CPP than patients in the control group, but the effect was not sustained after 6 h. Similarly, a significant reduction in ICP was observed only for a brief period, between the fourth and sixth hours. Vasopressors were more often used in the control group (13 [43.3%] vs. 5 [16.6%]; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the neurological outcome at 3 months in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant improvement in neurological outcome with ketamine infusion in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. There was a trend toward better CPP and lower ICP; however, the difference was statistically insignificant. Trial registered at Central Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2018/09/015729) at https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02274-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most of the sedative and analgesic drugs used in patients with head injury cause a dose-dependent decrease in blood pressure, which may further worsen secondary neurologic injury. The sympathomimetic profile of ketamine, along with its neuroprotectant effect, can have a beneficial effect in these patients.

Methods: A total of 60 adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury were randomized to receive either ketamine infusion at 3 mg/kg/h or normal saline. The study drugs were given by infusion while intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring was going on. Systemic hemodynamics, arterial blood gas values, ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and jugular venous oxygen saturation were monitored. At the end of 3 months, neurological outcome was recorded by an independent observer using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended.

Results: Baseline values of hemodynamic parameters were comparable in the two groups. In the initial 4-6 h, patients in the ketamine group had a significantly higher level of blood pressure and CPP than patients in the control group, but the effect was not sustained after 6 h. Similarly, a significant reduction in ICP was observed only for a brief period, between the fourth and sixth hours. Vasopressors were more often used in the control group (13 [43.3%] vs. 5 [16.6%]; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the neurological outcome at 3 months in both groups.

Conclusions: There was no significant improvement in neurological outcome with ketamine infusion in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. There was a trend toward better CPP and lower ICP; however, the difference was statistically insignificant. Trial registered at Central Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2018/09/015729) at https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/.

氯胺酮镇痛镇静对重型颅脑损伤患者神经系统预后的影响:一项随机对照先导研究。
背景:大多数用于颅脑损伤患者的镇静镇痛药物可引起剂量依赖性血压下降,这可能进一步加重继发性神经损伤。氯胺酮的拟交感神经特征及其神经保护作用对这些患者有有益作用。方法:选择60例重型颅脑损伤患者,随机分为氯胺酮输注3 mg/kg/h组和生理盐水组。在监测颅内压(ICP)的同时,给药。监测全身血流动力学、动脉血气值、颅内压(ICP)、脑灌注压(CPP)、颈静脉氧饱和度。3个月后,由独立观察员使用格拉斯哥结局量表(Glasgow outcome Scale-Extended)记录神经预后。结果:两组患者血流动力学参数基线值具有可比性。在最初的4-6小时内,氯胺酮组患者的血压和CPP水平明显高于对照组患者,但6小时后效果不持续。同样,仅在第4-6小时之间的短暂时间内观察到ICP的显着降低。对照组更常使用血管加压药物(13例[43.3%]vs. 5例[16.6%];p = 0.02)。两组患者3个月时的神经系统预后无差异。结论:氯胺酮输注对重型颅脑损伤患者的神经系统预后无显著改善。CPP越好,ICP越低;然而,差异在统计上不显著。在印度中央试验登记处注册的试验(CTRI/2018/09/015729),网址为https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信