Improving safety and timeliness around nasogastric tube feeding on an Acute stroke unit.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Manju Krishnan, Sarah Yeap, Bessy Howell, Mary Voulgaridou, Holly Robinson, Hannah Breeze-Jones, Tal Anjum, Peter Michael Edward Slade
{"title":"Improving safety and timeliness around nasogastric tube feeding on an Acute stroke unit.","authors":"Manju Krishnan, Sarah Yeap, Bessy Howell, Mary Voulgaridou, Holly Robinson, Hannah Breeze-Jones, Tal Anjum, Peter Michael Edward Slade","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding is required for artificial nutrition and hydration in those with impaired swallow due to a stroke. A baseline analysis of new NGT insertions on our acute stroke unit revealed considerable delays in the process and poor documentation of the risk-benefit discussions. We undertook a quality improvement project aimed at improving safety and reducing the delay in NGT insertion from an average of 5.2 hours (baseline) to under 3 hours in 6 months with a secondary aim of improving the documentation of risk-benefit discussions from 0% (baseline) to 50% during the same period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles of change ideas were implemented, including regular staff awareness sessions, introduction of new labels for the multidisciplinary team meetings and an NGT decision tool. The change ideas we used were directly linked to the secondary and primary drivers of the improvement journey with the help of a driver diagram. Process mapping helped to tighten our pathways. Consecutive data of timings were collected on an excel sheet and charted on a statistical process control chart. The compliance with documentation on the NGT decision tool was charted on a run chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The project achieved a consistent improvement in time taken from decision making to NGT insertion from a baseline average of 5.2 hours to 1.7 hours within 6 months and the new process was stable with an upper control limit reduction from 14.1 hours to 6.7 hours. The usage of the NGT decision tool increased from 0% to 80% during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The project achieved its aims and was able to improve patient care by changing the behaviour and culture within the team. The improvement has been sustained on an 8-month review, and the change has become 'business as usual' for the team.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding is required for artificial nutrition and hydration in those with impaired swallow due to a stroke. A baseline analysis of new NGT insertions on our acute stroke unit revealed considerable delays in the process and poor documentation of the risk-benefit discussions. We undertook a quality improvement project aimed at improving safety and reducing the delay in NGT insertion from an average of 5.2 hours (baseline) to under 3 hours in 6 months with a secondary aim of improving the documentation of risk-benefit discussions from 0% (baseline) to 50% during the same period.

Methods: Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles of change ideas were implemented, including regular staff awareness sessions, introduction of new labels for the multidisciplinary team meetings and an NGT decision tool. The change ideas we used were directly linked to the secondary and primary drivers of the improvement journey with the help of a driver diagram. Process mapping helped to tighten our pathways. Consecutive data of timings were collected on an excel sheet and charted on a statistical process control chart. The compliance with documentation on the NGT decision tool was charted on a run chart.

Results: The project achieved a consistent improvement in time taken from decision making to NGT insertion from a baseline average of 5.2 hours to 1.7 hours within 6 months and the new process was stable with an upper control limit reduction from 14.1 hours to 6.7 hours. The usage of the NGT decision tool increased from 0% to 80% during the same time period.

Conclusions: The project achieved its aims and was able to improve patient care by changing the behaviour and culture within the team. The improvement has been sustained on an 8-month review, and the change has become 'business as usual' for the team.

提高急性脑卒中单位鼻胃管喂养的安全性和及时性。
背景/目的:脑卒中后吞咽功能受损的患者需要鼻胃管(NGT)喂养来进行人工营养和水化。对我们急性卒中单元新植入NGT的基线分析显示,该过程存在相当大的延迟,风险-收益讨论的文件记录也很差。我们开展了一项质量改进项目,旨在提高安全性,并在6个月内将NGT插入的延迟从平均5.2小时(基线)减少到3小时以下,第二个目标是在同一时期将风险-收益讨论的记录从0%(基线)提高到50%。方法:实施多个计划-执行-研究-行动周期的变革理念,包括定期员工意识会议,为多学科团队会议引入新标签和NGT决策工具。在驱动图的帮助下,我们使用的变更想法直接与改进旅程的次要和主要驱动联系在一起。过程映射有助于收紧我们的路径。连续计时数据收集在excel表格上,并绘制在统计过程控制图上。对NGT决策工具文档的遵从性绘制在运行图上。结果:该项目在6个月内实现了从决策到NGT插入所需时间的持续改善,从基线平均5.2小时到1.7小时,新工艺稳定,控制上限从14.1小时减少到6.7小时。同一时期,NGT决策工具的使用率从0%增加到80%。结论:该项目实现了其目标,并能够通过改变团队内部的行为和文化来改善患者护理。在8个月的审查中,这种改进得以持续,并且对团队来说,这种变化已经变成了“正常的业务”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信