Enhancing patient satisfaction and experience through bedside interdisciplinary rounds: a quality improvement study.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Wael Ghali, Amer Abu-Shanab, Hardikkumar Bhanderi, Kelly Lewis, Elesia Grant, Kenneth Granet
{"title":"Enhancing patient satisfaction and experience through bedside interdisciplinary rounds: a quality improvement study.","authors":"Wael Ghali, Amer Abu-Shanab, Hardikkumar Bhanderi, Kelly Lewis, Elesia Grant, Kenneth Granet","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interdisciplinary rounds (IDRs) involve collaborative patient care where healthcare professionals from various disciplines meet to discuss and plan patient management. In this project, bedside IDRswere introduced at our hospital to enhance care quality, improve communication among medical teams and increase patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>After educating the staff, bedside IDRs were implemented with a team consisting of hospitalists, medical residents, nurses, nurse leaders, nutritionists, case managers and social workers, who gathered at each patient's bedside to discuss treatment plans and involve patients and their families in real-time discussions. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using Press Ganey (PG) scores over a 7-month period, comparing them with pre-implementation scores. Additionally, staff feedback on workflow and communication was gathered through pre- and postsurveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 7 months, bedside IDRs led to significant improvements in patient satisfaction and physician-patient communication, as reflected in PG scores. Patients reported feeling more respected and listened to, with a greater understanding of their disease and treatment plan. Staff surveys showed notable improvements in inter-departmental communication and discharge planning effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Bedside IDRs improved key patient care aspects, including communication, respect and understanding of treatment plans. By involving the entire healthcare team in patient discussions, a more collaborative and patient-centred approach was fostered, leading to patients feeling heard and respected. A clearer, unified treatment plan improved patients' understanding of their care. Despite initial coordination challenges, these were addressed with standardised scheduling. Overall, bedside IDRs resulted in better communication among providers, more comprehensive care plans, timely discharges and increased patient satisfaction, ultimately enhancing healthcare delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultimately, bedside IDRs contributed to improved healthcare delivery, with positive outcomes on different aspects. These findings highlight the potential of bedside IDRs to improve the quality of care and patient satisfaction in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interdisciplinary rounds (IDRs) involve collaborative patient care where healthcare professionals from various disciplines meet to discuss and plan patient management. In this project, bedside IDRswere introduced at our hospital to enhance care quality, improve communication among medical teams and increase patient satisfaction.

Methodology: After educating the staff, bedside IDRs were implemented with a team consisting of hospitalists, medical residents, nurses, nurse leaders, nutritionists, case managers and social workers, who gathered at each patient's bedside to discuss treatment plans and involve patients and their families in real-time discussions. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using Press Ganey (PG) scores over a 7-month period, comparing them with pre-implementation scores. Additionally, staff feedback on workflow and communication was gathered through pre- and postsurveys.

Results: Over 7 months, bedside IDRs led to significant improvements in patient satisfaction and physician-patient communication, as reflected in PG scores. Patients reported feeling more respected and listened to, with a greater understanding of their disease and treatment plan. Staff surveys showed notable improvements in inter-departmental communication and discharge planning effectiveness.

Discussion: Bedside IDRs improved key patient care aspects, including communication, respect and understanding of treatment plans. By involving the entire healthcare team in patient discussions, a more collaborative and patient-centred approach was fostered, leading to patients feeling heard and respected. A clearer, unified treatment plan improved patients' understanding of their care. Despite initial coordination challenges, these were addressed with standardised scheduling. Overall, bedside IDRs resulted in better communication among providers, more comprehensive care plans, timely discharges and increased patient satisfaction, ultimately enhancing healthcare delivery.

Conclusion: Ultimately, bedside IDRs contributed to improved healthcare delivery, with positive outcomes on different aspects. These findings highlight the potential of bedside IDRs to improve the quality of care and patient satisfaction in hospital settings.

通过床边跨学科查房提高患者满意度和体验:一项质量改进研究。
简介:跨学科查房(idr)涉及协作性患者护理,来自不同学科的医疗保健专业人员聚集在一起讨论和计划患者管理。本项目在我院引入床边idrs,以提高护理质量,改善医疗团队之间的沟通,提高患者满意度。方法:在对工作人员进行教育后,由医院医生、住院医师、护士、护士长、营养学家、病例管理人员和社会工作者组成的团队实施床边idr,他们聚集在每个患者的床边讨论治疗计划,并让患者及其家属参与实时讨论。使用7个月的Press Ganey (PG)评分评估患者满意度,并将其与实施前的评分进行比较。此外,通过前后调查收集员工对工作流程和沟通的反馈。结果:7个月后,床边IDRs显著改善了患者满意度和医患沟通,这反映在PG评分中。患者报告说,他们对自己的疾病和治疗计划有了更深入的了解,感觉得到了更多的尊重和倾听。员工调查显示,部门间沟通及离职计划的成效均有显著改善。讨论:床边IDRs改善了关键的患者护理方面,包括沟通、尊重和理解治疗计划。通过让整个医疗团队参与患者讨论,培养了一种更具协作性和以患者为中心的方法,使患者感到被倾听和尊重。更清晰、统一的治疗方案提高了患者对护理的理解。尽管最初的协调存在挑战,但这些问题都通过标准化调度得到了解决。总体而言,床边idr改善了提供者之间的沟通,制定了更全面的护理计划,及时出院,提高了患者满意度,最终提高了医疗服务质量。结论:最终,床边idr有助于改善医疗服务,在不同方面都有积极的结果。这些发现强调了床边idr在提高医院护理质量和患者满意度方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信