Tissue-based gene expression testing in localized prostate cancer.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001289
Nethusan Sivanesan, Gabriela M Diaz, Preston C Sprenkle
{"title":"Tissue-based gene expression testing in localized prostate cancer.","authors":"Nethusan Sivanesan, Gabriela M Diaz, Preston C Sprenkle","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review presents the latest research in tissue-based genomic testing in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Here we explore the current and most commonly used genomic assays, their clinical applications, current challenges, and the future of genomic testing.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The management of localized PCa has evolved with the integration of genomic assays, offering a more personalized approach to risk stratification and treatment decision-making. Traditional clinical markers such as PSA levels and Gleason scores are often insufficient in capturing clinically significant cancer due to disease heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Tissue-based genomic tests, such as Decipher, Oncotype DX (GPS), and Prolaris, have emerged as prognostic tools for assessing tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Current evidence supports Decipher's prognostic capabilities with studies demonstrating risk stratification while further research is needed for Prolaris and GPS to solidify their role in PCa risk stratification. These assays are intended to guide therapeutic choices, reducing overtreatment in low-risk cases while identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive or definitive intervention. Despite growing clinical adoption, challenges such as cost, disparities in access, and variability in physician utilization still remain. Further prospective studies and randomized trials are required to optimize clinical implementation and validate the long-term impact of genomic testing on PCa outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"432-438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review presents the latest research in tissue-based genomic testing in localized prostate cancer (PCa). Here we explore the current and most commonly used genomic assays, their clinical applications, current challenges, and the future of genomic testing.

Recent findings: The management of localized PCa has evolved with the integration of genomic assays, offering a more personalized approach to risk stratification and treatment decision-making. Traditional clinical markers such as PSA levels and Gleason scores are often insufficient in capturing clinically significant cancer due to disease heterogeneity.

Summary: Tissue-based genomic tests, such as Decipher, Oncotype DX (GPS), and Prolaris, have emerged as prognostic tools for assessing tumor aggressiveness and metastatic potential. Current evidence supports Decipher's prognostic capabilities with studies demonstrating risk stratification while further research is needed for Prolaris and GPS to solidify their role in PCa risk stratification. These assays are intended to guide therapeutic choices, reducing overtreatment in low-risk cases while identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive or definitive intervention. Despite growing clinical adoption, challenges such as cost, disparities in access, and variability in physician utilization still remain. Further prospective studies and randomized trials are required to optimize clinical implementation and validate the long-term impact of genomic testing on PCa outcomes.

局部前列腺癌组织基因表达检测。
综述目的:本文综述了局限性前列腺癌(PCa)基于组织的基因组检测的最新研究进展。在这里,我们将探讨当前和最常用的基因组分析,它们的临床应用,当前的挑战,以及基因组检测的未来。最近发现:随着基因组分析的整合,局部PCa的管理已经发展,为风险分层和治疗决策提供了更个性化的方法。由于疾病的异质性,传统的临床标志物如PSA水平和Gleason评分往往不足以捕获具有临床意义的癌症。摘要:基于组织的基因组检测,如Decipher、Oncotype DX (GPS)和Prolaris,已经成为评估肿瘤侵袭性和转移潜力的预后工具。目前的证据支持破译的预后能力,研究表明风险分层,但需要进一步的研究来巩固Prolaris和GPS在前列腺癌风险分层中的作用。这些试验旨在指导治疗选择,减少低风险病例的过度治疗,同时确定可能从更积极或更明确的干预中受益的高风险患者。尽管越来越多的临床应用,挑战,如成本,可及性的差异,并在医生使用的变化仍然存在。需要进一步的前瞻性研究和随机试验来优化临床实施,并验证基因组检测对PCa结果的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信