Management of hypotension in dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker overdose: The role of high-dose insulin therapy.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Betty S H Chan, Katherine Z Isoardi, Darren M Roberts, Ong Sook Har
{"title":"Management of hypotension in dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker overdose: The role of high-dose insulin therapy.","authors":"Betty S H Chan, Katherine Z Isoardi, Darren M Roberts, Ong Sook Har","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Amlodipine poisoning is a leading cause of cardiovascular medication-related deaths, commonly managed with high-dose insulin (HDI) therapy. However, HDI is a vasodilator that is counterproductive in managing vasoplegia. We aim to study HDI therapy in patients with hypotension following dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist (CCA) overdose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study includes adult patients (≥15 years) with deliberate dihydropyridine CCA overdose and hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg or systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) managed by two Poisons Information Centres and three toxicology units in Australia (2020-2023). Patients who received HDI were compared with those who did not receive HDI therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 50 patients (31 female [62%], median age 57 years). Forty-one (82%) coingested a renin-angiotensin system antagonist. Ten (20%) received HDI (median bolus dose of 1 U/kg and infusion 1.25 U/kg/h, interquartile range: 0.9-5.5) and 40 (80%) did not receive HDI therapy. Eight patients in the HDI had echocardiogram, 4 showed left ventricular dysfunction. There were no differences in the 2 groups regarding age, sex, median dose of dihydropyridine and renin-angiotensin system antagonists. Median minimal systolic blood pressure (P = .0007) and mean arterial pressure (P = .0006) were significantly lower prior to starting HDI. There were increased maximal concomitant number of vasopressors/inotropes used (median difference: 1.5; P = .0002) and at higher doses in the HDI group. Median dose of noradrenaline used was 1.15 μg/kg/min in the HDI group vs. 0.27 μg/kg/min in the non-HDI group (P = .003). One fatality occurred in the non-HDI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dihydropyridine CCA poisoning with associated hypotension was treated primarily with vasopressor therapy. The inodilator HDI was not commonly used, and it was primarily administered in low doses, utilized mainly in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Amlodipine poisoning is a leading cause of cardiovascular medication-related deaths, commonly managed with high-dose insulin (HDI) therapy. However, HDI is a vasodilator that is counterproductive in managing vasoplegia. We aim to study HDI therapy in patients with hypotension following dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist (CCA) overdose.

Methods: This retrospective study includes adult patients (≥15 years) with deliberate dihydropyridine CCA overdose and hypotension (mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg or systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) managed by two Poisons Information Centres and three toxicology units in Australia (2020-2023). Patients who received HDI were compared with those who did not receive HDI therapy.

Results: There were 50 patients (31 female [62%], median age 57 years). Forty-one (82%) coingested a renin-angiotensin system antagonist. Ten (20%) received HDI (median bolus dose of 1 U/kg and infusion 1.25 U/kg/h, interquartile range: 0.9-5.5) and 40 (80%) did not receive HDI therapy. Eight patients in the HDI had echocardiogram, 4 showed left ventricular dysfunction. There were no differences in the 2 groups regarding age, sex, median dose of dihydropyridine and renin-angiotensin system antagonists. Median minimal systolic blood pressure (P = .0007) and mean arterial pressure (P = .0006) were significantly lower prior to starting HDI. There were increased maximal concomitant number of vasopressors/inotropes used (median difference: 1.5; P = .0002) and at higher doses in the HDI group. Median dose of noradrenaline used was 1.15 μg/kg/min in the HDI group vs. 0.27 μg/kg/min in the non-HDI group (P = .003). One fatality occurred in the non-HDI group.

Conclusion: Dihydropyridine CCA poisoning with associated hypotension was treated primarily with vasopressor therapy. The inodilator HDI was not commonly used, and it was primarily administered in low doses, utilized mainly in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

过量二氢吡啶钙通道阻滞剂低血压的治疗:大剂量胰岛素治疗的作用。
目的:氨氯地平中毒是心血管药物相关死亡的主要原因,通常采用高剂量胰岛素(HDI)治疗。然而,HDI是一种血管扩张剂,在治疗血管截瘫中起反作用。我们的目的是研究HDI治疗过量服用二氢吡啶钙通道拮抗剂(CCA)后低血压患者。方法:回顾性研究纳入有意过量使用二氢吡啶CCA并伴有低血压(平均动脉压)的成人患者(≥15岁)。结果:50例患者(女性31例[62%],中位年龄57岁)。41人(82%)服用肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂。10例(20%)接受HDI治疗(中位丸剂量为1 U/kg,输注1.25 U/kg/h,四分位数范围:0.9-5.5),40例(80%)未接受HDI治疗。HDI组有8例超声心动图,4例显示左心室功能不全。两组患者在年龄、性别、双氢吡啶和肾素-血管紧张素系统拮抗剂的中位剂量等方面均无差异。中位最小收缩压(P = 0.0007)和平均动脉压(P = 0.0006)在开始HDI前显著降低。使用血管加压药/肌力药物的最大伴随数增加(中位数差:1.5;P = 0.0002), HDI组的剂量更高。HDI组去甲肾上腺素的中位剂量为1.15 μg/kg/min,非HDI组为0.27 μg/kg/min (P = 0.003)。非hdi组有一例死亡。结论:二氢吡啶CCA中毒合并低血压主要采用血管加压治疗。HDI不常用,主要以低剂量给药,主要用于左心室功能不全的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信