Bioequivalence and Tolerability of 2 Lurasidone Formulations: A Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-Period, Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hengyi Yu, Yinian Fang, Xingxing Qi, Pan Luo, Zheng He, Kaifu Wang, Yongfang Lei, Donglin Zhang, Qin Zuo, Chang Liu, Qian Chen, Dong Liu, Xiuhua Ren
{"title":"Bioequivalence and Tolerability of 2 Lurasidone Formulations: A Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-Period, Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.","authors":"Hengyi Yu, Yinian Fang, Xingxing Qi, Pan Luo, Zheng He, Kaifu Wang, Yongfang Lei, Donglin Zhang, Qin Zuo, Chang Liu, Qian Chen, Dong Liu, Xiuhua Ren","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lurasidone is utilized in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar depression in adults and adolescents. In this work, a randomized, single-dose, 2-period crossover study was designed and conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of 2 lurasidone tablets. A total of 111 healthy Chinese subjects received a single dose of 40 mg lurasidone test (T) or reference (R) tablets under fasting or fed conditions, with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected and lurasidone plasma concentration was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic properties were determined by a non-compartmental analysis, and C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-inf</sub> were used for bioequivalence evaluation. As a result, the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios between T and R fell within 80%-125% whether under fasting or fed conditions, indicating that the 2 lurasidone formulations were bioequivalent. Meanwhile, the C<sub>max</sub> and AUC of both T and R were approximately 2-3 times higher in the fed state compared to the fasting state. In addition, all adverse events (AEs) were classified into grade 1, and no serious or new AEs were reported. Additionally, a shorter t<sub>1/2</sub> of the reference tablet was observed in this study compared to that of the other bioequivalence study conducted in older healthy Chinese subjects, which should be verified in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lurasidone is utilized in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar depression in adults and adolescents. In this work, a randomized, single-dose, 2-period crossover study was designed and conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of 2 lurasidone tablets. A total of 111 healthy Chinese subjects received a single dose of 40 mg lurasidone test (T) or reference (R) tablets under fasting or fed conditions, with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected and lurasidone plasma concentration was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic properties were determined by a non-compartmental analysis, and Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf were used for bioequivalence evaluation. As a result, the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios between T and R fell within 80%-125% whether under fasting or fed conditions, indicating that the 2 lurasidone formulations were bioequivalent. Meanwhile, the Cmax and AUC of both T and R were approximately 2-3 times higher in the fed state compared to the fasting state. In addition, all adverse events (AEs) were classified into grade 1, and no serious or new AEs were reported. Additionally, a shorter t1/2 of the reference tablet was observed in this study compared to that of the other bioequivalence study conducted in older healthy Chinese subjects, which should be verified in the future.

两种鲁拉西酮制剂的生物等效性和耐受性:一项随机、单剂量、2期、交叉研究,在空腹和进食条件下进行。
鲁拉西酮用于成人和青少年精神分裂症和双相抑郁症的治疗。本研究设计了一项随机、单剂量、2期交叉研究,以评价2种鲁拉西酮片的生物等效性和安全性。111名健康的中国受试者分别在禁食或进食条件下服用单剂量40 mg鲁拉西酮试验片(T)或参比片(R),洗脱期为7 d。采集血样,采用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定鲁拉西酮血浆浓度。采用非区室分析确定药代动力学特性,采用Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-inf进行生物等效性评价。结果表明,无论在禁食还是饲喂条件下,T和R的几何平均比值的90%置信区间均在80%-125%之间,说明两种鲁拉西酮制剂具有生物等效性。同时,进食状态下T和R的Cmax和AUC均比禁食状态高约2-3倍。此外,所有不良事件(ae)均为1级,无严重或新发ae报告。此外,与其他在中国老年人健康受试者中进行的生物等效性研究相比,本研究中观察到参考片的t1/2缩短,这有待于未来的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信