{"title":"Addressing practical challenges with bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma.","authors":"Sreeraj Vasudevan, Bhavesh Mohan Lal, Nikhil Vojjala, Meera Mohan","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2495984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have demonstrated impressive standalone effectiveness in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, as evidenced by clinical trials and real-world findings. Current clinical studies are investigating these drugs as both monotherapies and in combination treatments for earlier stages of myeloma, including newly diagnosed cases.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>With many options available in clinical settings, several questions emerge: How can one bsAb be chosen over another? What is the best way to administer bsAbs, including initial step-up and continuous dosing schedules? How can unique toxicities be managed, and what strategies should be used to address disease relapses following bsAb treatment?</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Tocilizumab is being investigated in the prevention of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Steroids can be used to safely treat CRS in myeloma patients on bsAb therapy. This may allow a safe outpatient step-up dosing program. Despite improved infection management with intravenous immunoglobulin prophylaxis, infection risks continue as long as patients are on therapy. This indicates alternative strategies like less frequent dosing or finite duration therapy are needed. Optimal management of disease relapse after bsAb therapy and the sequencing of bsAb and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"607-613"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2495984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have demonstrated impressive standalone effectiveness in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, as evidenced by clinical trials and real-world findings. Current clinical studies are investigating these drugs as both monotherapies and in combination treatments for earlier stages of myeloma, including newly diagnosed cases.
Areas covered: With many options available in clinical settings, several questions emerge: How can one bsAb be chosen over another? What is the best way to administer bsAbs, including initial step-up and continuous dosing schedules? How can unique toxicities be managed, and what strategies should be used to address disease relapses following bsAb treatment?
Expert opinion: Tocilizumab is being investigated in the prevention of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Steroids can be used to safely treat CRS in myeloma patients on bsAb therapy. This may allow a safe outpatient step-up dosing program. Despite improved infection management with intravenous immunoglobulin prophylaxis, infection risks continue as long as patients are on therapy. This indicates alternative strategies like less frequent dosing or finite duration therapy are needed. Optimal management of disease relapse after bsAb therapy and the sequencing of bsAb and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies require further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.