Association of clinicopathological factor with lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yangfeng Lin, Zhijie You, Zhijing Lin, Siming Wang, Guohua Yang
{"title":"Association of clinicopathological factor with lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Yangfeng Lin, Zhijie You, Zhijing Lin, Siming Wang, Guohua Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03960-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic inflammatory response (SIR) indicators serve as predictive factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in various cancers. This study aimed to investigate the association of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with LNM in rectal cancer and to identify clinicopathological factors linked to LNM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 181 rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection. Preoperative NLR and PLR were calculated from blood samples, with optimal cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Associations between NLR/PLR and clinicopathological features were evaluated, risk factors for LNM were analyzed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the high NLR (H-NLR) and low NLR (L-NLR) groups in terms of clinicopathological characteristics, including TNM stage, perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), or serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 respectively (p > 0.05).In contrast, the high PLR (H-PLR) group showed significantly higher prevalence of several adverse pathological features: The H-PLR group had a higher positive PNI (54.2% vs.25.0%,p = 0.04), greater positive LVI(51.6% vs.28.6%,p = 0.025),and more positive TDs (14.4% vs.0,p = 0.028), increased lymph node metastasis (52.9% vs.17.9%,p < 0.001), more elevated CEA (43.1% vs.14.3%,p = 0.005) and more advanced tumor stage (stage II + stage III,81% vs.67.9%,p = 0.003).Univariate analysis identified several factors significantly associated with LNM: T stage (OR = 3.156, 95%CI:1.580-6.303),positive PNI (OR = 6.182,95%CI:3.242-11.787),positive LVI (OR = 10.271,95%CI:5.177-20.375),H-PLR(OR = 5.175,95%CI:1.870-14.321),positive TDs (OR = 3.390,95%CI:1.261-9.117),TLN(OR = 1.053,95%CI:1.005-1.103),elevated CEA(OR = 3.313,95%CI:1.655-5.920) and elevated CA199 (OR = 2.248,95%CI:1.012-4.992) were correlated with LNM using univariate analysis, but only positive LVI(adjusted OR = 6.203,95%CI:2.892-13.303,p < 0.001) and positive PNI (adjusted OR = 3.086,95%CI:1.341-7.102,p = 0.008) were the independent risk factors for LNM using multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>H-PLR but not H-NLR may be associated with LNM, positive LVI and PNI were independent risk factors for LNM in RC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03960-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic inflammatory response (SIR) indicators serve as predictive factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in various cancers. This study aimed to investigate the association of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with LNM in rectal cancer and to identify clinicopathological factors linked to LNM.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 181 rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection. Preoperative NLR and PLR were calculated from blood samples, with optimal cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Associations between NLR/PLR and clinicopathological features were evaluated, risk factors for LNM were analyzed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: No significant differences were observed between the high NLR (H-NLR) and low NLR (L-NLR) groups in terms of clinicopathological characteristics, including TNM stage, perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), or serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 respectively (p > 0.05).In contrast, the high PLR (H-PLR) group showed significantly higher prevalence of several adverse pathological features: The H-PLR group had a higher positive PNI (54.2% vs.25.0%,p = 0.04), greater positive LVI(51.6% vs.28.6%,p = 0.025),and more positive TDs (14.4% vs.0,p = 0.028), increased lymph node metastasis (52.9% vs.17.9%,p < 0.001), more elevated CEA (43.1% vs.14.3%,p = 0.005) and more advanced tumor stage (stage II + stage III,81% vs.67.9%,p = 0.003).Univariate analysis identified several factors significantly associated with LNM: T stage (OR = 3.156, 95%CI:1.580-6.303),positive PNI (OR = 6.182,95%CI:3.242-11.787),positive LVI (OR = 10.271,95%CI:5.177-20.375),H-PLR(OR = 5.175,95%CI:1.870-14.321),positive TDs (OR = 3.390,95%CI:1.261-9.117),TLN(OR = 1.053,95%CI:1.005-1.103),elevated CEA(OR = 3.313,95%CI:1.655-5.920) and elevated CA199 (OR = 2.248,95%CI:1.012-4.992) were correlated with LNM using univariate analysis, but only positive LVI(adjusted OR = 6.203,95%CI:2.892-13.303,p < 0.001) and positive PNI (adjusted OR = 3.086,95%CI:1.341-7.102,p = 0.008) were the independent risk factors for LNM using multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: H-PLR but not H-NLR may be associated with LNM, positive LVI and PNI were independent risk factors for LNM in RC.

临床病理因素与直肠癌患者淋巴结转移的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
系统性炎症反应(SIR)指标是多种癌症淋巴结转移(LNM)的预测因素。本研究旨在探讨血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)与直肠癌LNM的关系,并确定与LNM相关的临床病理因素。方法:对181例直肠癌手术切除患者进行回顾性分析。术前NLR和PLR由血液样本计算,通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定最佳截断值。评估NLR/PLR与临床病理特征之间的关系,通过单因素和多因素logistic回归分析LNM的危险因素。结果:高NLR组(H-NLR)与低NLR组(L-NLR)在TNM分期、神经周围浸润(PNI)、淋巴血管浸润(LVI)、血清CEA、CA19-9水平等临床病理特征上差异均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与此相反,高PLR (H-PLR)组的几种不良病理特征的患病率明显高于H-PLR组:PNI阳性(54.2%比25.0%,p = 0.04), LVI阳性(51.6%比28.6%,p = 0.025), TDs阳性(14.4%比0,p = 0.028),淋巴结转移增加(52.9%比17.9%,p)结论:H-PLR可能与LNM相关,LVI阳性和PNI阳性是RC中LNM的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信