Learning strategies and multimusicality in ear-learning tasks: An experimental pilot study

IF 1.3 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kayla Rush
{"title":"Learning strategies and multimusicality in ear-learning tasks: An experimental pilot study","authors":"Kayla Rush","doi":"10.1177/02557614251339552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on a small-scale experimental pilot study examining instrumentalists’ techniques for aural learning of new melodies from various cultural traditions, with the goal of contributing to a contemporary understanding of multimusicality. It examines what strategies musicians employ to learn new melodies and whether these strategies vary when the musicians are asked to learn melodies from unfamiliar music-cultures. The study participants ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 12) were recruited from an arts department at a third-level institution in Ireland. Several were multimusical, with a high level of training and/or experience in two or more music-cultures. The article identifies three broad learning strategies deployed by study participants, which at times overlapped or were used simultaneously. These are named ‘segment-by-segment’, ‘joining-in’ and ‘chords-before-melody’. While learning strategies are based on experience and existing knowledge, genre and music-culture background proved to be poor indicators of the strategies deployed in the experimental task. Participants applied the same learning toolkit to both familiar and unfamiliar musics, but individual strategies differed based on a number of parameters. The findings raise interesting questions about multimusicality, and they suggest further research is needed to more fully explore these questions.","PeriodicalId":46623,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Music Education","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02557614251339552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reports on a small-scale experimental pilot study examining instrumentalists’ techniques for aural learning of new melodies from various cultural traditions, with the goal of contributing to a contemporary understanding of multimusicality. It examines what strategies musicians employ to learn new melodies and whether these strategies vary when the musicians are asked to learn melodies from unfamiliar music-cultures. The study participants ( n = 12) were recruited from an arts department at a third-level institution in Ireland. Several were multimusical, with a high level of training and/or experience in two or more music-cultures. The article identifies three broad learning strategies deployed by study participants, which at times overlapped or were used simultaneously. These are named ‘segment-by-segment’, ‘joining-in’ and ‘chords-before-melody’. While learning strategies are based on experience and existing knowledge, genre and music-culture background proved to be poor indicators of the strategies deployed in the experimental task. Participants applied the same learning toolkit to both familiar and unfamiliar musics, but individual strategies differed based on a number of parameters. The findings raise interesting questions about multimusicality, and they suggest further research is needed to more fully explore these questions.
耳学习任务中的学习策略和多乐性:一项实验性先导研究
本文报告了一项小规模的实验性研究,旨在研究器乐演奏家从不同文化传统中听觉学习新旋律的技术,目的是促进当代对多音乐性的理解。它考察了音乐家学习新旋律时采用的策略,以及当音乐家被要求学习来自陌生音乐文化的旋律时,这些策略是否会发生变化。研究参与者(n = 12)是从爱尔兰一所三级院校的艺术系招募的。有几个是多音乐的,受过高水平的训练和/或有两种或两种以上音乐文化的经验。本文确定了研究参与者使用的三种广泛的学习策略,这些策略有时重叠或同时使用。它们分别被称为“分段-分段”、“加入”和“旋律前和弦”。虽然学习策略是基于经验和现有知识,但流派和音乐文化背景被证明是实验任务中部署的策略的不良指标。参与者对熟悉的和不熟悉的音乐都使用了相同的学习工具,但基于一些参数,个人策略有所不同。这些发现提出了关于多乐性的有趣问题,他们认为需要进一步的研究来更充分地探索这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Music Education (IJME) is a peer-reviewed journal published by the International Society for Music Education (ISME) four times a year. Manuscripts published are scholarly works, representing empirical research in a variety of modalities. They enhance knowledge regarding the teaching and learning of music with a special interest toward an international constituency. Manuscripts report results of quantitative or qualitative research studies, summarize bodies or research, present theories, models, or philosophical positions, etc. Papers show relevance to advancing the practice of music teaching and learning at all age levels with issues of direct concern to the classroom or studio, in school and out, private and group instruction. All manuscripts should contain evidence of a scholarly approach and be situated within the current literature. Implications for learning and teaching of music should be clearly stated, relevant, contemporary, and of interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信