Development and implementation of paging and escalation guidelines to improve interprofessional communication on surgical units.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michael A Kochis, Lynze R Franko, Kathleen Swierzewski, Alison Parmar, Suzanne Algeri, Rajshri M Gartland
{"title":"Development and implementation of paging and escalation guidelines to improve interprofessional communication on surgical units.","authors":"Michael A Kochis, Lynze R Franko, Kathleen Swierzewski, Alison Parmar, Suzanne Algeri, Rajshri M Gartland","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Suboptimal interprofessional communication in the surgical inpatient setting has important implications for patient safety. Our departmental quality committee identified numerous safety events resulting from discordant expectations between surgical floor nurses and surgical residents or advanced practice providers (APPs) who serve as responding clinicians (RCs), and from reluctance to escalate clinical concerns. Alphanumeric paging is frequently used to communicate, but there are opportunities to enhance its effectiveness. This initiative sought to improve perceptions of communication and responsiveness between nurses and RCs by providing a shared language and set of expectations about the urgency of pages, appropriate responses and the process of escalation to other team members if necessary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interprofessional team of surgical faculty, nurses and residents solicited input from surgical floor nurses, operating room nurses, residents, APPs and attendings on their perceptions of communication barriers among team members via online surveys and focus groups. Guidelines were iteratively developed. They specify that every page should be classified as STAT, Urgent, Please Call or FYI. Each classification is associated with an expected response time and pathway for contacting alternative team members if no response is received. After 3 months of implementation on our hospital's two main general surgery units, follow-up online surveys with multiple-choice and free-response questions assessed perceived impacts on communication and clinical care. Differences in categorical variables were assessed with χ<sup>2</sup> tests, and free text was analysed inductively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After implementation, nurses reported favourable effects on communication, including significantly improved responsiveness during night shifts and timeliness from RCs during day shifts. Residents and attendings perceived the intervention to have overall neutral to mildly positive effects on communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paging and Escalation Guidelines are a feasible approach to enhance the perceptions of communication between nurses and RCs by aligning expectations, streamlining responses and decreasing barriers to escalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Suboptimal interprofessional communication in the surgical inpatient setting has important implications for patient safety. Our departmental quality committee identified numerous safety events resulting from discordant expectations between surgical floor nurses and surgical residents or advanced practice providers (APPs) who serve as responding clinicians (RCs), and from reluctance to escalate clinical concerns. Alphanumeric paging is frequently used to communicate, but there are opportunities to enhance its effectiveness. This initiative sought to improve perceptions of communication and responsiveness between nurses and RCs by providing a shared language and set of expectations about the urgency of pages, appropriate responses and the process of escalation to other team members if necessary.

Methods: An interprofessional team of surgical faculty, nurses and residents solicited input from surgical floor nurses, operating room nurses, residents, APPs and attendings on their perceptions of communication barriers among team members via online surveys and focus groups. Guidelines were iteratively developed. They specify that every page should be classified as STAT, Urgent, Please Call or FYI. Each classification is associated with an expected response time and pathway for contacting alternative team members if no response is received. After 3 months of implementation on our hospital's two main general surgery units, follow-up online surveys with multiple-choice and free-response questions assessed perceived impacts on communication and clinical care. Differences in categorical variables were assessed with χ2 tests, and free text was analysed inductively.

Results: After implementation, nurses reported favourable effects on communication, including significantly improved responsiveness during night shifts and timeliness from RCs during day shifts. Residents and attendings perceived the intervention to have overall neutral to mildly positive effects on communication.

Conclusions: Paging and Escalation Guidelines are a feasible approach to enhance the perceptions of communication between nurses and RCs by aligning expectations, streamlining responses and decreasing barriers to escalation.

制定和实施寻呼和升级指南,以改善外科单位的专业间沟通。
在外科住院病人设置的次优跨专业沟通对患者安全具有重要意义。我们的部门质量委员会确定了许多安全事件,这些事件是由于手术室护士和外科住院医生或作为响应临床医生(rc)的高级实践提供者(app)之间的期望不一致,以及不愿升级临床关注。字母数字分页经常用于通信,但有机会提高其有效性。该倡议旨在通过提供一种共同的语言和一套关于页面紧迫性的期望,适当的回应和必要时向其他团队成员升级的过程,改善护士和rc之间的沟通和响应的看法。方法:一个由外科教师、护士和住院医生组成的跨专业团队,通过在线调查和焦点小组,向外科楼层护士、手术室护士、住院医生、app和主治医生征求他们对团队成员之间沟通障碍的看法。指导方针是反复制定的。他们规定,每一页应分类为STAT、Urgent、Please Call或FYI。每个分类都与预期的响应时间和联系替代团队成员的途径相关联,如果没有收到响应。在我们医院的两个主要普通外科科室实施了3个月后,随访的在线调查采用了多项选择和自由回答问题,评估了对沟通和临床护理的感知影响。分类变量间差异采用χ2检验,自由文本采用归纳分析。结果:实施后,护士报告了良好的沟通效果,包括夜班期间的反应能力显著提高,白班期间rc的及时性显著提高。住院医师和主治医师认为干预对沟通的整体影响为中性至轻微的积极影响。结论:呼叫和升级指南是一种可行的方法,可以通过调整期望、简化反应和减少升级障碍来增强护士和rc之间的沟通认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信