{"title":"Suppression of popping rates in radiofrequency ablation under perfluorobutane microbubbles for hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Toru Ishikawa, Hiroshi Hirosawa, Tsubasa Honmou, Iori Hasegawa, Nobuyuki Sakai, Ryo Sato, Ryo Jimbo, Yuji Kobayashi, Toshifumi Sato, Akito Iwanaga, Tomoe Sano, Junji Yokoyama, Terasu Honma","doi":"10.5114/ceh.2024.145451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Popping during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can cause complications such as bleeding and tumor seeding. Perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid, GE Healthcare) are employed to enhance visualization through the use of vascular and Kupffer imaging. This study aimed to assess the impact of Sonazoid on popping during RFA for HCC and evaluate popping and local recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We examined 135 patients and 308 nodules undergoing RFA for HCC using a unipolar needle electrode between December 2019 and December 2023. Popping and local recurrence rates were compared between RFA groups with and without Sonazoid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort comprised 99 males and 36 females, with a mean age of 72 (range: 35-93) years. Background liver conditions included 21 hepatitis B virus (HBV), 44 hepatitis C virus (HCV), and 70 non-HBV/HCV cases. The group without Sonazoid had 267 nodes, while the Sonazoid group had 41 nodes. In energy-related comparisons, the Sonazoid group exhibited lower power (<i>p</i> = 0.039) and energy delivery (<i>p</i> = 0.013) and shorter cauterization time (<i>p</i> = 0.021). The popping rate during cauterization was significantly lower in the Sonazoid group (28.8% vs. 12.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.023). There was no significant difference in local recurrence rate between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RFA with Sonazoid using a unipolar needle-type electrode reduced power output, enabling lower-energy ablation and shorter ablation times. This suggests a potential for suppressing the popping phenomenon. Low-power ablation did not affect local recurrence rates, highlighting RFA as a less invasive treatment strategy. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to evaluate treatment efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10281,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"10 4","pages":"257-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2024.145451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim of the study: Popping during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can cause complications such as bleeding and tumor seeding. Perfluorobutane microbubbles (Sonazoid, GE Healthcare) are employed to enhance visualization through the use of vascular and Kupffer imaging. This study aimed to assess the impact of Sonazoid on popping during RFA for HCC and evaluate popping and local recurrence rates.
Material and methods: We examined 135 patients and 308 nodules undergoing RFA for HCC using a unipolar needle electrode between December 2019 and December 2023. Popping and local recurrence rates were compared between RFA groups with and without Sonazoid.
Results: The cohort comprised 99 males and 36 females, with a mean age of 72 (range: 35-93) years. Background liver conditions included 21 hepatitis B virus (HBV), 44 hepatitis C virus (HCV), and 70 non-HBV/HCV cases. The group without Sonazoid had 267 nodes, while the Sonazoid group had 41 nodes. In energy-related comparisons, the Sonazoid group exhibited lower power (p = 0.039) and energy delivery (p = 0.013) and shorter cauterization time (p = 0.021). The popping rate during cauterization was significantly lower in the Sonazoid group (28.8% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.023). There was no significant difference in local recurrence rate between the two groups.
Conclusions: RFA with Sonazoid using a unipolar needle-type electrode reduced power output, enabling lower-energy ablation and shorter ablation times. This suggests a potential for suppressing the popping phenomenon. Low-power ablation did not affect local recurrence rates, highlighting RFA as a less invasive treatment strategy. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to evaluate treatment efficacy.
研究目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)射频消融(RFA)过程中的爆裂可引起出血和肿瘤生长等并发症。采用全氟丁烷微泡(Sonazoid, GE Healthcare)通过血管和库普弗成像增强可视化。本研究旨在评估索那唑类药物对肝细胞癌RFA期间爆裂的影响,并评估爆裂和局部复发率。材料和方法:在2019年12月至2023年12月期间,我们使用单极针电极检查了135例接受RFA治疗的HCC患者和308个结节。比较使用索那唑和不使用索那唑的RFA组的爆裂率和局部复发率。结果:该队列包括99名男性和36名女性,平均年龄72岁(范围:35-93岁)。背景肝病包括21例乙型肝炎病毒(HBV), 44例丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)和70例非HBV/HCV病例。非索那唑类药物组有267个淋巴结,而索那唑类药物组有41个淋巴结。在能量相关的比较中,Sonazoid组表现出较低的功率(p = 0.039)和能量传递(p = 0.013)和较短的烧灼时间(p = 0.021)。索那唑类药物组在烧灼过程中的爆裂率显著低于对照组(28.8% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.023)。两组局部复发率差异无统计学意义。结论:使用单极针型电极的Sonazoid射频消融降低了功率输出,实现了更低能量的消融和更短的消融时间。这表明有可能抑制这种爆裂现象。低功率消融不影响局部复发率,强调RFA是一种侵入性较小的治疗策略。需要更大规模的进一步研究来评估治疗效果。
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology – quarterly of the Polish Association for Study of Liver – is a scientific and educational, peer-reviewed journal publishing original and review papers describing clinical and basic investigations in the field of hepatology.