Identifying frail patients at the front door: a quality improvement project on improving identifying frailty and accuracy of Clinical Frailty Scale in the emergency department in an acute general hospital.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yuhan Zhang, Antonio Cosimetti, Alex Montagu
{"title":"Identifying frail patients at the front door: a quality improvement project on improving identifying frailty and accuracy of Clinical Frailty Scale in the emergency department in an acute general hospital.","authors":"Yuhan Zhang, Antonio Cosimetti, Alex Montagu","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rise in frail patients seeking care at emergency departments (ED) globally has led to an increased focus on improving the identification and care of frail patients on arrival in ED. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) has been used in the ED to identify frail elderly patients and prompt the initiation of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. However, it has been noted that the CFS's accuracy was low, and training needs have been identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To address this, a quality improvement project was carried out using the PDSA (Plan, Do, Study and Act) cycle to enhance the accuracy of frailty identification at the front door. Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guideline is followed to report.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Based on the fishbone and driver diagram, a training programme was designed and delivered to the ED nurses in November 2023 (PDSA cycle 1) and from September to October 2024 (PDSA cycle 2). A lanyard card was developed to simplify and standardise the CFS scoring. This was disseminated to ED nurses along with 1:1 brief education in conjunction with other training activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the training intervention, the correct identification of CFS 6 and above improved from a baseline of around 50% to around 60% after the first cycle and to over 70% after the second cycle. While the accuracy of CFS also improved to 40%, it remains to be seen whether this change is sustainable and not just a normal variation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This quality improvement project, using a lanyard card, in conjunction with brief teaching and other training methods, effectively increased the rate at which moderate to very severely frail frailty was identified and subsequently referred to frailty teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rise in frail patients seeking care at emergency departments (ED) globally has led to an increased focus on improving the identification and care of frail patients on arrival in ED. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) has been used in the ED to identify frail elderly patients and prompt the initiation of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. However, it has been noted that the CFS's accuracy was low, and training needs have been identified.

Methods: To address this, a quality improvement project was carried out using the PDSA (Plan, Do, Study and Act) cycle to enhance the accuracy of frailty identification at the front door. Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guideline is followed to report.

Intervention: Based on the fishbone and driver diagram, a training programme was designed and delivered to the ED nurses in November 2023 (PDSA cycle 1) and from September to October 2024 (PDSA cycle 2). A lanyard card was developed to simplify and standardise the CFS scoring. This was disseminated to ED nurses along with 1:1 brief education in conjunction with other training activities.

Results: Following the training intervention, the correct identification of CFS 6 and above improved from a baseline of around 50% to around 60% after the first cycle and to over 70% after the second cycle. While the accuracy of CFS also improved to 40%, it remains to be seen whether this change is sustainable and not just a normal variation.

Conclusion: This quality improvement project, using a lanyard card, in conjunction with brief teaching and other training methods, effectively increased the rate at which moderate to very severely frail frailty was identified and subsequently referred to frailty teams.

前门识别体弱多病:提高急性综合医院急诊科体弱多病识别及准确性的质量改进项目
背景:全球在急诊科(ED)寻求治疗的体弱患者数量的增加,导致人们越来越关注在到达急诊科时改善体弱患者的识别和护理。临床虚弱量表(CFS)已在急诊科中使用,以识别体弱的老年患者,并促使启动全面的老年评估。然而,已经注意到CFS的准确性较低,并且已经确定了培训需求。方法:为了解决这一问题,采用PDSA(计划、做、研究和行动)循环进行了质量改进项目,以提高前门脆弱性识别的准确性。按照质量改进报告准则进行报告。干预:根据鱼骨图和驾驶员图,设计了一个培训计划,并于2023年11月(PDSA周期1)和2024年9月至10月(PDSA周期2)向急诊科护士提供了培训计划。为了简化和标准化CFS评分,我们开发了一种挂绳卡。这是分发给急诊科护士,并与其他培训活动一起进行一对一的简短教育。结果:训练干预后,CFS 6及以上的正确识别率从基线的50%左右提高到第一个周期后的60%左右,第二个周期后提高到70%以上。虽然CFS的准确性也提高到40%,但这种变化是否可持续,而不仅仅是正常的变化,还有待观察。结论:这个质量改进项目,使用挂绳卡,结合简短的教学和其他培训方法,有效地提高了中度至非常严重虚弱的识别率,并随后转介到虚弱小组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信