Jonathan Retter, David Heist, R Chris Owen, Michael Pirhalla, Terrance Odom, Lydia Brouwer
{"title":"Neutral Boundary Layer Urban Dispersion in Scaled Uniform and Nonuniform Residential Building Arrays.","authors":"Jonathan Retter, David Heist, R Chris Owen, Michael Pirhalla, Terrance Odom, Lydia Brouwer","doi":"10.1007/s10546-024-00891-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dispersion within idealized urban environments was studied in a simulated neutrally buoyant, 1:200 scale boundary layer with the Meteorological Wind Tunnel at the EPA's Fluid Modeling Facility. The measurements are used to offer a baseline of performance for the mechanical turbulence formulation and concentration predictions of AERMOD, the EPA's preferred Gaussian dispersion model. Scaled meteorological conditions and dispersion characteristics were studied for both uniform and nonuniform building arrays oriented at 0° and 30° with respect to the flow and were compared to baseline, \"rural\", measurements without the presence of buildings. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) measured velocity and shear stress profiles within each model configuration, whereas hydrocarbon analyzers (HCAs) measured ethane concentrations at defined points throughout the model. Four source locations were examined for each building array, with two in the urban core and two in a street canyon, each with a source within and above the building canopy. Experimental profiles, regardless of their shape, were fitted to Gaussian profiles to determine lateral and vertical plume spread and shift from the wind tunnel centerline. These parameters were compared against a no-building reference case. Concentration predictions using the formulations in AERMOD are computed for 3 variations of modeled velocity profiles for each source, using factor of 2 ( <math><mi>F</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>2</mi></math> ) and fractional bias ( <math><mi>F</mi> <mi>B</mi></math> ) as the governing model evaluation parameters. The two urban configurations were found to decrease the <math><mi>F</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>2</mi></math> performance by 34.1% and 30.1% from the no-building reference for the uniform and nonuniform cases, respectively, while producing modeled concentrations of only 48.1% and 62.4% of the 10 highest observed concentrations. These results encouraged simple first-order corrections to improve model performance with an emphasis on predicting maximum concentrations for regulatory purposes. These corrections proved successful for the uniform cases, mitigating <math><mi>F</mi> <mi>B</mi></math> , and improving the <math><mi>F</mi> <mi>A</mi> <mi>C</mi> <mi>2</mi></math> percentage by 11.4% with more mixed results in nonuniform configurations, highlighting the difficulty in applying uniformly derived parameterizations in realistic, nonuniform environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9153,"journal":{"name":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","volume":"191 ","pages":"1-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00891-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dispersion within idealized urban environments was studied in a simulated neutrally buoyant, 1:200 scale boundary layer with the Meteorological Wind Tunnel at the EPA's Fluid Modeling Facility. The measurements are used to offer a baseline of performance for the mechanical turbulence formulation and concentration predictions of AERMOD, the EPA's preferred Gaussian dispersion model. Scaled meteorological conditions and dispersion characteristics were studied for both uniform and nonuniform building arrays oriented at 0° and 30° with respect to the flow and were compared to baseline, "rural", measurements without the presence of buildings. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) measured velocity and shear stress profiles within each model configuration, whereas hydrocarbon analyzers (HCAs) measured ethane concentrations at defined points throughout the model. Four source locations were examined for each building array, with two in the urban core and two in a street canyon, each with a source within and above the building canopy. Experimental profiles, regardless of their shape, were fitted to Gaussian profiles to determine lateral and vertical plume spread and shift from the wind tunnel centerline. These parameters were compared against a no-building reference case. Concentration predictions using the formulations in AERMOD are computed for 3 variations of modeled velocity profiles for each source, using factor of 2 ( ) and fractional bias ( ) as the governing model evaluation parameters. The two urban configurations were found to decrease the performance by 34.1% and 30.1% from the no-building reference for the uniform and nonuniform cases, respectively, while producing modeled concentrations of only 48.1% and 62.4% of the 10 highest observed concentrations. These results encouraged simple first-order corrections to improve model performance with an emphasis on predicting maximum concentrations for regulatory purposes. These corrections proved successful for the uniform cases, mitigating , and improving the percentage by 11.4% with more mixed results in nonuniform configurations, highlighting the difficulty in applying uniformly derived parameterizations in realistic, nonuniform environments.
在环境保护局流体模拟设施的气象风洞中,在模拟的中性浮力、1:200比例尺边界层中研究了理想城市环境中的扩散。这些测量结果用于为AERMOD (EPA首选的高斯弥散模型)的机械湍流公式和浓度预测提供性能基准。研究了均匀和非均匀建筑阵列在0°和30°方向上的尺度气象条件和弥散特性,并将其与没有建筑物存在的基线“农村”测量结果进行了比较。颗粒图像测速(PIV)测量了每个模型配置中的速度和剪切应力分布,而碳氢化合物分析仪(HCAs)测量了整个模型中特定点的乙烷浓度。每个建筑阵列检查了四个源位置,其中两个在城市核心,两个在街道峡谷,每个都有一个源在建筑顶棚内部和上方。无论实验剖面的形状如何,都将其拟合到高斯剖面上,以确定横向和垂直羽流的扩散以及从风洞中心线的移动。这些参数与一个没有建筑的参考案例进行了比较。使用AERMOD中的公式对每个源的模拟速度剖面的3种变化进行浓度预测,使用因子2 (F A C 2)和分数偏差(F B)作为控制模型评估参数。结果表明,在均匀和不均匀的情况下,这两种城市配置分别使无建筑参考条件下的co2性能下降34.1%和30.1%,而模拟浓度仅占观测到的10个最高浓度的48.1%和62.4%。这些结果鼓励进行简单的一阶修正,以提高模型性能,重点是预测用于监管目的的最大浓度。这些修正在均匀的情况下被证明是成功的,减少了fb,并在非均匀配置的混合结果中提高了fa2百分比11.4%,突出了在现实的非均匀环境中应用均匀导出的参数化的困难。
期刊介绍:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology offers several publishing options: Research Letters, Research Articles, and Notes and Comments. The Research Letters section is designed to allow quick dissemination of new scientific findings, with an initial review period of no longer than one month. The Research Articles section offers traditional scientific papers that present results and interpretations based on substantial research studies or critical reviews of ongoing research. The Notes and Comments section comprises occasional notes and comments on specific topics with no requirement for rapid publication. Research Letters are limited in size to five journal pages, including no more than three figures, and cannot contain supplementary online material; Research Articles are generally fifteen to twenty pages in length with no more than fifteen figures; Notes and Comments are limited to ten journal pages and five figures. Authors submitting Research Letters should include within their cover letter an explanation of the need for rapid publication. More information regarding all publication formats can be found in the recent Editorial ‘Introducing Research Letters to Boundary-Layer Meteorology’.