Oral Health Promotion Interventions in Residential Aged Care Facilities - A Systematic Review of Behaviour Change Techniques Used in Interventions.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nesa Aurlene, Sindhu Ravichandran, Melanie Bish, Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla
{"title":"Oral Health Promotion Interventions in Residential Aged Care Facilities - A Systematic Review of Behaviour Change Techniques Used in Interventions.","authors":"Nesa Aurlene, Sindhu Ravichandran, Melanie Bish, Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.13042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The oral health status of older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) is found to be very poor. Many oral health promotion interventions have been tested in RACF settings around the world with varying degrees of success.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this systematic review is to analyse the health promotion strategies used in oral health promotion interventions in RACF settings and map the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used in interventions to the Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy Version 1 (BCTTV1). This will help us identify the BCTs that are used and how effective they are in improving oral health outcomes for residents and the knowledge, attitudes and skills of caregivers in providing mouth care assistance to residents of RACFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A database search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Sciences databases to screen for articles relevant to the topic of the review; after full-text review a total of 31 articles comprising both randomised controlled trials and non-randomised intervention studies were included in this review. Risks of bias in randomised studies were assessed using the ROB2 tool and ROBINS-I was used to evaluate non-randomised studies. The description of intervention content in each study was coded for the presence of BCTs by two independent review authors trained in coding BCTs according to BCTTv1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most commonly used BCTs were 'demonstration of behaviour', 'instruction on how to perform behaviour' and 'credible source'. These BCTs were effective in improving oral health outcomes and knowledge of caregivers on short-term follow-up. A higher number of BCTs were coded in studies that showed significant improvement in oral health outcomes of residents on long-term follow-up with rarely used BCTs related to 'monitoring and feedback' being coded in majority of studies that showed consistent improvement in oral health outcomes of residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified the most commonly used BCTs used in health promotion interventions to improve oral health among older people in RACFs and found that majority of interventions were targeted towards 'knowledge transfer' and were inconsistent in improving oral health outcomes for residents over long-term. Well conducted studies with use of theoretical behaviour change frameworks to develop oral health promotion interventions are needed as majority of strategies used currently do not demonstrate consistent effectiveness in improving oral health outcomes for residents of RACFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.13042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The oral health status of older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) is found to be very poor. Many oral health promotion interventions have been tested in RACF settings around the world with varying degrees of success.

Aim: The aim of this systematic review is to analyse the health promotion strategies used in oral health promotion interventions in RACF settings and map the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used in interventions to the Behaviour Change Techniques Taxonomy Version 1 (BCTTV1). This will help us identify the BCTs that are used and how effective they are in improving oral health outcomes for residents and the knowledge, attitudes and skills of caregivers in providing mouth care assistance to residents of RACFs.

Methods: A database search was conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Sciences databases to screen for articles relevant to the topic of the review; after full-text review a total of 31 articles comprising both randomised controlled trials and non-randomised intervention studies were included in this review. Risks of bias in randomised studies were assessed using the ROB2 tool and ROBINS-I was used to evaluate non-randomised studies. The description of intervention content in each study was coded for the presence of BCTs by two independent review authors trained in coding BCTs according to BCTTv1.

Results: The most commonly used BCTs were 'demonstration of behaviour', 'instruction on how to perform behaviour' and 'credible source'. These BCTs were effective in improving oral health outcomes and knowledge of caregivers on short-term follow-up. A higher number of BCTs were coded in studies that showed significant improvement in oral health outcomes of residents on long-term follow-up with rarely used BCTs related to 'monitoring and feedback' being coded in majority of studies that showed consistent improvement in oral health outcomes of residents.

Conclusion: This review identified the most commonly used BCTs used in health promotion interventions to improve oral health among older people in RACFs and found that majority of interventions were targeted towards 'knowledge transfer' and were inconsistent in improving oral health outcomes for residents over long-term. Well conducted studies with use of theoretical behaviour change frameworks to develop oral health promotion interventions are needed as majority of strategies used currently do not demonstrate consistent effectiveness in improving oral health outcomes for residents of RACFs.

长者住宿护理机构的口腔健康促进干预措施-干预措施中使用的行为改变技术的系统回顾。
背景:居住在住宅养老机构的老年人口腔健康状况很差。许多促进口腔健康的干预措施已在世界各地的RACF环境中进行了测试,取得了不同程度的成功。目的:本系统综述的目的是分析RACF环境中口腔健康促进干预措施中使用的健康促进策略,并将干预措施中使用的行为改变技术(bct)映射到行为改变技术分类法第1版(BCTTV1)。这将有助于我们确定所使用的bct,以及它们在改善居民口腔健康结果方面的效果,以及护理人员在向社区住客提供口腔护理援助方面的知识、态度和技能。方法:检索MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL、Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR)、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL和Web of Sciences数据库,筛选与综述主题相关的文章;全文综述后,本综述共纳入31篇文章,包括随机对照试验和非随机干预研究。使用ROB2工具评估随机研究的偏倚风险,使用ROBINS-I评估非随机研究。每项研究的干预内容描述均由两名接受过bct编码培训的独立综述作者根据BCTTv1编码bct。结果:最常用的btc是“行为示范”、“如何执行行为的指导”和“可靠来源”。这些bct在短期随访中有效地改善了口腔健康结果和护理人员的知识。在长期随访中显示居民口腔健康结果显著改善的研究中,编码了更多的bct,而在大多数显示居民口腔健康结果持续改善的研究中,编码了与“监测和反馈”相关的很少使用的bct。结论:本综述确定了健康促进干预措施中最常用的bct,以改善racf老年人的口腔健康,并发现大多数干预措施以“知识转移”为目标,并且在长期改善居民口腔健康结果方面不一致。需要使用理论行为改变框架进行良好的研究,以制定促进口腔健康的干预措施,因为目前使用的大多数策略在改善口腔健康结果方面没有表现出一致的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信