{"title":"Time, distress and the social good of palliative medicine research participation.","authors":"Katharine Weetman, Cara Bailey, John I MacArtney","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research involving patients is often subject to demanding ethical review processes to protect research participants and prevent harm or fraud. While having a robust ethical approval process is necessary, in practice, within palliative care contexts, the ethical issues and challenges raised (eg, gatekeeping) can often be detrimental to the research and, ultimately, people in need of high-quality care. We draw on evidence from our own research and others to challenge one-time-suits-all approaches to 'protect the vulnerable' in research, which, we argue, <i>makes</i> people in end-of-life contexts more vulnerable as their voices are at risk of being excluded.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005471","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research involving patients is often subject to demanding ethical review processes to protect research participants and prevent harm or fraud. While having a robust ethical approval process is necessary, in practice, within palliative care contexts, the ethical issues and challenges raised (eg, gatekeeping) can often be detrimental to the research and, ultimately, people in need of high-quality care. We draw on evidence from our own research and others to challenge one-time-suits-all approaches to 'protect the vulnerable' in research, which, we argue, makes people in end-of-life contexts more vulnerable as their voices are at risk of being excluded.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.
We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication.
In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.