Joint modeling of multistate survival processes with informative examination scheme: application to progressions in diabetes.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yuxi Zhu, Joshua J Joseph, Neena Thomas, Lang Li, Guy Brock
{"title":"Joint modeling of multistate survival processes with informative examination scheme: application to progressions in diabetes.","authors":"Yuxi Zhu, Joshua J Joseph, Neena Thomas, Lang Li, Guy Brock","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02543-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multistate survival models (MSMs) are widely used in the medical field of clinical studies. For example, in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), these models can be applied to describe progression in T2D by predefining several T2D states based on available biometric measurements such as hemoglobin A1 C (HbA1c). In most cases, MSMs come with an assumption that the examination process is independent of disease progression. However, in practice, complete independence between disease progression and examination processes is unrealistic, as the frequency at which a patient accesses healthcare may vary based on treatment and/or control of the health condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We built a joint model of a 4-state transition process of T2D with informative examination scheme (i.e., the patterns of examination times are not random). Risk factors including age, sex, race, and socioeconomic disadvantage were included in a log-linear model examining T2D transition intensities and healthcare visit frequencies. Parameters of the joint model are estimated under the framework of likelihood function by the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The joint model demonstrated that people living in neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage had a lower healthcare visit frequency under all 4 defined T2D statuses. Evaluation of race/ethnicity revealed that comparing to non-Hispanic White patients, Black patients had higher risk for progressing from Normal to Prediabetes, T2D, and Uncontrolled T2D states.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our joint model offers a framework for analyzing multistate survival processes while accounting for the dependence between disease progression and examination frequency. Unlike traditional MSMs that estimate only transition intensities, our model captures variations in healthcare visit frequencies across different disease states, providing a more comprehensive understanding of disease dynamics and healthcare access patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02543-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multistate survival models (MSMs) are widely used in the medical field of clinical studies. For example, in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), these models can be applied to describe progression in T2D by predefining several T2D states based on available biometric measurements such as hemoglobin A1 C (HbA1c). In most cases, MSMs come with an assumption that the examination process is independent of disease progression. However, in practice, complete independence between disease progression and examination processes is unrealistic, as the frequency at which a patient accesses healthcare may vary based on treatment and/or control of the health condition.

Methods: We built a joint model of a 4-state transition process of T2D with informative examination scheme (i.e., the patterns of examination times are not random). Risk factors including age, sex, race, and socioeconomic disadvantage were included in a log-linear model examining T2D transition intensities and healthcare visit frequencies. Parameters of the joint model are estimated under the framework of likelihood function by the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm.

Results: The joint model demonstrated that people living in neighborhoods with greater socioeconomic disadvantage had a lower healthcare visit frequency under all 4 defined T2D statuses. Evaluation of race/ethnicity revealed that comparing to non-Hispanic White patients, Black patients had higher risk for progressing from Normal to Prediabetes, T2D, and Uncontrolled T2D states.

Conclusions: Our joint model offers a framework for analyzing multistate survival processes while accounting for the dependence between disease progression and examination frequency. Unlike traditional MSMs that estimate only transition intensities, our model captures variations in healthcare visit frequencies across different disease states, providing a more comprehensive understanding of disease dynamics and healthcare access patterns.

结合信息性检查方案的多状态生存过程联合建模:在糖尿病进展中的应用。
背景:多状态生存模型在医学领域的临床研究中得到了广泛的应用。例如,在2型糖尿病(T2D)中,这些模型可以通过基于可用的生物测量(如血红蛋白A1 - C (HbA1c))预先定义几种T2D状态来描述T2D的进展。在大多数情况下,msm都假设检查过程与疾病进展无关。然而,在实践中,疾病进展和检查过程之间的完全独立是不现实的,因为患者获得医疗保健的频率可能因治疗和/或健康状况的控制而异。方法:采用信息性检查方案(即检查时间模式不是随机的)构建T2D四态过渡过程联合模型。风险因素包括年龄、性别、种族和社会经济劣势,这些因素被纳入检验T2D转换强度和就诊频率的对数线性模型中。采用期望最大化算法在似然函数框架下对联合模型的参数进行估计。结果:联合模型显示,在所有4种定义的T2D状态下,生活在社会经济劣势较大的社区的人们就诊频率较低。种族/民族评估显示,与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,黑人患者从正常发展到糖尿病前期、T2D和未控制T2D状态的风险更高。结论:我们的联合模型为分析多状态生存过程提供了一个框架,同时考虑了疾病进展和检查频率之间的依赖性。与仅估计过渡强度的传统msm不同,我们的模型捕获了不同疾病状态下医疗保健访问频率的变化,从而提供了对疾病动态和医疗保健访问模式的更全面理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信