Prehospital to emergency department handoff: can team-based reporting improve markers of clinical efficiency in an adult emergency department?

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Christopher L Gross, Corey D Cowgill, Brent A Selph, Jessica M Cowgill, Ziad Saqr, Brandon R Allen, Frederick S Southwick, Charles W Hwang
{"title":"Prehospital to emergency department handoff: can team-based reporting improve markers of clinical efficiency in an adult emergency department?","authors":"Christopher L Gross, Corey D Cowgill, Brent A Selph, Jessica M Cowgill, Ziad Saqr, Brandon R Allen, Frederick S Southwick, Charles W Hwang","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interdisciplinary communication is a critical component of quality patient care. On emergency medical services (EMS) arrival to the emergency department (ED), the pre-existing opportunity-based reporting (OBR) handoff paradigm may result in disjointed, repetitive and incomplete transition of patient care to the ED, adversely impacting patient care. This quality improvement study was conducted at a tertiary care, academic university hospital ED and evaluated the impact of team-based reporting (TBR) during EMS patient handoff in the ED on several markers of clinical efficiency (CE). The standard OBR handoff protocol was compared with the TBR protocol, which brings the patient's ED care team to bedside shortly after patient arrival, allowing EMS to give a single, synchronous handoff. The use of TBR during prehospital-ED handoffs was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvement across multiple CE quality indicators. A team-based handoff strategy is a low-cost policy intervention that provides meaningful improvements related to CE and quality care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interdisciplinary communication is a critical component of quality patient care. On emergency medical services (EMS) arrival to the emergency department (ED), the pre-existing opportunity-based reporting (OBR) handoff paradigm may result in disjointed, repetitive and incomplete transition of patient care to the ED, adversely impacting patient care. This quality improvement study was conducted at a tertiary care, academic university hospital ED and evaluated the impact of team-based reporting (TBR) during EMS patient handoff in the ED on several markers of clinical efficiency (CE). The standard OBR handoff protocol was compared with the TBR protocol, which brings the patient's ED care team to bedside shortly after patient arrival, allowing EMS to give a single, synchronous handoff. The use of TBR during prehospital-ED handoffs was associated with statistically and clinically significant improvement across multiple CE quality indicators. A team-based handoff strategy is a low-cost policy intervention that provides meaningful improvements related to CE and quality care.

院前到急诊科的交接:以团队为基础的报告能否提高成人急诊科的临床效率指标?
跨学科交流是高质量患者护理的关键组成部分。在紧急医疗服务(EMS)到达急诊科(ED)时,预先存在的基于机会的报告(OBR)移交范式可能导致患者护理向急诊科的脱节、重复和不完整的过渡,对患者护理产生不利影响。这项质量改进研究是在一家三级医疗、学术大学附属医院急诊科进行的,目的是评估急诊科EMS患者交接过程中团队报告(TBR)对临床效率(CE)几个指标的影响。标准的OBR交接协议与TBR协议进行了比较,TBR协议在患者到达后不久将患者的急诊科护理团队带到床边,允许EMS进行单次同步交接。院前ed交接期间TBR的使用与多个CE质量指标的统计学和临床显著改善相关。基于团队的交接策略是一种低成本的政策干预,可提供与CE和质量护理相关的有意义的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信