Methods to assess lower limb prosthetic adaptation: a systematic review.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Natali Olaya-Mira, Luz Marina Gómez-Hernández, Carolina Viloria-Barragán, Isabel Cristina Soto-Cardona
{"title":"Methods to assess lower limb prosthetic adaptation: a systematic review.","authors":"Natali Olaya-Mira, Luz Marina Gómez-Hernández, Carolina Viloria-Barragán, Isabel Cristina Soto-Cardona","doi":"10.1186/s12984-024-01530-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower limb amputation is a disabling condition with serious psychological, physical, and functional consequences. The adaptation of a prosthetic device can either mitigate or exacerbate these effects. Although many individuals receive lower limb prostheses, rejection rates remain high. Furthermore, while numerous objective and quantitative methods are available to assess the interface between the residual limb and the prosthetic socket, as well as the device performance, prosthetic fitting largely relies on prosthetists' observation and expertise. Accordingly, this review describes the most commonly employed methods for evaluating prosthetic fitting, emphasizing frequently used combinations of tools, devices, procedures, and tests for characterizing residual limbs and clinical outcomes, which indirectly contribute to prosthetic fitting evaluation.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>In July 2023, searches were conducted across the Taylor & Francis, SpringerLink, Sage, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases, focusing on research papers, case reports, and technical briefs published between 2011 and 2023. Studies were selected by four reviewers, and any discrepancies were resolved through group discussions. The Rayyan tool was employed to ensure that the retrieved publications evaluated residual limb variables involved in prosthetic fitting. The predominant methods for assessing lower-limb prosthetic fitting include mobility evaluation, gait analysis, measurement of physical variables, and stability assessment. Functional tests and self-report questionnaires, which do not require specialized equipment or great expertise, are the most widely utilized techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate that, within clinical practice, mobility evaluation is the primary predictor of prosthetic fitting. Since methodologies for measuring more specific variables are often restricted to laboratory settings, future studies should analyze factors that could enable their implementation in clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01530-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower limb amputation is a disabling condition with serious psychological, physical, and functional consequences. The adaptation of a prosthetic device can either mitigate or exacerbate these effects. Although many individuals receive lower limb prostheses, rejection rates remain high. Furthermore, while numerous objective and quantitative methods are available to assess the interface between the residual limb and the prosthetic socket, as well as the device performance, prosthetic fitting largely relies on prosthetists' observation and expertise. Accordingly, this review describes the most commonly employed methods for evaluating prosthetic fitting, emphasizing frequently used combinations of tools, devices, procedures, and tests for characterizing residual limbs and clinical outcomes, which indirectly contribute to prosthetic fitting evaluation.

Main body: In July 2023, searches were conducted across the Taylor & Francis, SpringerLink, Sage, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases, focusing on research papers, case reports, and technical briefs published between 2011 and 2023. Studies were selected by four reviewers, and any discrepancies were resolved through group discussions. The Rayyan tool was employed to ensure that the retrieved publications evaluated residual limb variables involved in prosthetic fitting. The predominant methods for assessing lower-limb prosthetic fitting include mobility evaluation, gait analysis, measurement of physical variables, and stability assessment. Functional tests and self-report questionnaires, which do not require specialized equipment or great expertise, are the most widely utilized techniques.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that, within clinical practice, mobility evaluation is the primary predictor of prosthetic fitting. Since methodologies for measuring more specific variables are often restricted to laboratory settings, future studies should analyze factors that could enable their implementation in clinical contexts.

评估下肢假肢适应性的方法:系统综述。
背景:下肢截肢是一种致残性疾病,具有严重的心理、生理和功能后果。假体装置的适应性可以减轻或加剧这些影响。虽然许多人接受下肢假体,但排异率仍然很高。此外,虽然有许多客观和定量的方法可用于评估残肢与假体窝之间的界面以及设备性能,但假体安装在很大程度上依赖于假体医师的观察和专业知识。因此,本综述描述了评估义肢装配最常用的方法,强调了用于表征残肢和临床结果的常用工具、设备、程序和测试组合,这些间接有助于评估义肢装配。正文:2023年7月,对Taylor & Francis、SpringerLink、Sage、ScienceDirect和Scopus数据库进行了检索,重点是2011年至2023年间发表的研究论文、案例报告和技术简报。研究由四位审稿人选择,任何差异通过小组讨论解决。使用Rayyan工具来确保检索到的出版物评估假肢装配中涉及的残肢变量。评估下肢假肢装配的主要方法包括机动性评估、步态分析、物理变量测量和稳定性评估。功能测试和自我报告调查表不需要专门设备或很高的专业知识,是使用最广泛的技术。结论:结果表明,在临床实践中,活动能力评估是假肢安装的主要预测因素。由于测量更具体变量的方法通常仅限于实验室设置,因此未来的研究应分析能够在临床环境中实施的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信