The Impact of Dietary Interventions on the Pharmacokinetics of Antifungal Drugs: A Systematic Review with Meta-analyses.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1007/s40262-025-01511-6
Agnieszka Wiesner-Kiełczewska, Paweł Zagrodzki, Paweł Paśko
{"title":"The Impact of Dietary Interventions on the Pharmacokinetics of Antifungal Drugs: A Systematic Review with Meta-analyses.","authors":"Agnieszka Wiesner-Kiełczewska, Paweł Zagrodzki, Paweł Paśko","doi":"10.1007/s40262-025-01511-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Managing food-drug interactions may help to optimize the efficacy and safety of antifungal therapy. This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate how food, beverages, antacids, and mineral supplements influence the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of 14 orally administered antifungal drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We considered all studies evaluating the effects of food, beverages, antacids, and mineral supplements on PK parameters and PK/PD indices of oral antifungal drugs for inclusion. We excluded in vitro, in silico, animal studies, reviews, and alcohol-related investigations. Searches were conducted in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception to June 2024. We evaluated the risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) tool for before-after studies and the Cochrane tool for parallel and cross-over trials. We performed meta-analyses when two or more studies with comparable designs were available; otherwise, results were summarized qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 73 studies from 68 reports. Only studies investigating the effect of dietary interactions on PK parameters were found. Meta-analyses were conducted for seven antifungal drugs, while qualitative synthesis covered the remaining drugs. Open-label, cross-over studies accounted for 58% of trials, aligning with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations. A high risk of bias appeared in 33% of studies, while only 7% showed low risk. Among 11 antifungals with food-effect data, seven (64%) exhibited clinically important interactions. High positive food effects (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) or peak serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) increased by > 45%) were seen for griseofulvin, itraconazole capsules and tablets (except rice-based meals), and posaconazole immediate-release tablets and suspension. A moderate positive impact of high-fat meals (AUC or C<sub>max</sub> increased in the range of 35-45%) occurred for ibrexafungerp and oteseconazole. A high negative food effect was observed on the absorption of voriconazole and itraconazole oral suspension or super bioavailable (SUBA) capsules (AUC or C<sub>max</sub> decreased by > 40%). Antacids strongly reduced itraconazole and ketoconazole absorption, while nutritional supplements improved posaconazole bioavailability. Acidic beverages such as Coca Cola substantially enhanced the absorption of itraconazole, ketoconazole, and posaconazole, whereas orange juice significantly reduced itraconazole bioavailability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interactions were influenced by such factors as drug physicochemical properties, type of dietary intervention, drug formulation, and patient characteristics. Although the review largely filled the existing gaps in recommendations, we judged the overall quality of evidence as low owing to outdated studies, methodological inconsistencies, and uneven data availability. Further research involving PK/PD indices is needed to link the postprandial changes in the bioavailability of antifungal drugs with their clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Other: </strong>The protocol of the systematic review was registered in March 2024 in the Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HAVK9 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":10405,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","volume":" ","pages":"815-848"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacokinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-025-01511-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Managing food-drug interactions may help to optimize the efficacy and safety of antifungal therapy. This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate how food, beverages, antacids, and mineral supplements influence the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of 14 orally administered antifungal drugs.

Methods: We considered all studies evaluating the effects of food, beverages, antacids, and mineral supplements on PK parameters and PK/PD indices of oral antifungal drugs for inclusion. We excluded in vitro, in silico, animal studies, reviews, and alcohol-related investigations. Searches were conducted in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception to June 2024. We evaluated the risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) tool for before-after studies and the Cochrane tool for parallel and cross-over trials. We performed meta-analyses when two or more studies with comparable designs were available; otherwise, results were summarized qualitatively.

Results: The review included 73 studies from 68 reports. Only studies investigating the effect of dietary interactions on PK parameters were found. Meta-analyses were conducted for seven antifungal drugs, while qualitative synthesis covered the remaining drugs. Open-label, cross-over studies accounted for 58% of trials, aligning with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations. A high risk of bias appeared in 33% of studies, while only 7% showed low risk. Among 11 antifungals with food-effect data, seven (64%) exhibited clinically important interactions. High positive food effects (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) or peak serum concentration (Cmax) increased by > 45%) were seen for griseofulvin, itraconazole capsules and tablets (except rice-based meals), and posaconazole immediate-release tablets and suspension. A moderate positive impact of high-fat meals (AUC or Cmax increased in the range of 35-45%) occurred for ibrexafungerp and oteseconazole. A high negative food effect was observed on the absorption of voriconazole and itraconazole oral suspension or super bioavailable (SUBA) capsules (AUC or Cmax decreased by > 40%). Antacids strongly reduced itraconazole and ketoconazole absorption, while nutritional supplements improved posaconazole bioavailability. Acidic beverages such as Coca Cola substantially enhanced the absorption of itraconazole, ketoconazole, and posaconazole, whereas orange juice significantly reduced itraconazole bioavailability.

Conclusion: Interactions were influenced by such factors as drug physicochemical properties, type of dietary intervention, drug formulation, and patient characteristics. Although the review largely filled the existing gaps in recommendations, we judged the overall quality of evidence as low owing to outdated studies, methodological inconsistencies, and uneven data availability. Further research involving PK/PD indices is needed to link the postprandial changes in the bioavailability of antifungal drugs with their clinical efficacy.

Other: The protocol of the systematic review was registered in March 2024 in the Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HAVK9 ).

饮食干预对抗真菌药物药代动力学的影响:荟萃分析的系统综述。
背景与目的:控制食品药物相互作用可能有助于优化抗真菌治疗的疗效和安全性。本系统综述遵循系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,评估了食品、饮料、抗酸剂和矿物质补充剂如何影响14种口服抗真菌药物的药代动力学(PK)参数或药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)指数。方法:纳入所有评价食品、饮料、抗酸剂和矿物质补充剂对口服抗真菌药物PK参数和PK/PD指数影响的研究。我们排除了体外、计算机、动物研究、综述和酒精相关调查。检索从数据库建立到2024年6月在Medline(通过PubMed)、Embase和Cochrane Library进行。我们使用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的前后研究工具和Cochrane的平行和交叉试验工具来评估偏倚风险。当两项或两项以上具有可比设计的研究可用时,我们进行meta分析;否则,对结果进行定性总结。结果:本综述包括来自68篇报道的73项研究。目前只发现了饲料相互作用对PK参数影响的研究。对7种抗真菌药物进行meta分析,其余药物进行定性合成。开放标签、交叉研究占试验的58%,与美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的建议一致。33%的研究存在高偏倚风险,只有7%的研究存在低偏倚风险。在11种具有食物效应数据的抗真菌药物中,7种(64%)表现出重要的临床相互作用。灰黄霉素、伊曲康唑胶囊和片剂(米粉除外)、泊沙康唑速释片和混悬液均有较高的阳性食品效应(浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)或血清峰浓度(Cmax)增加约45%)。高脂肪膳食对ibrexafungerp和oteseconazole有中等程度的积极影响(AUC或Cmax增加35-45%)。伏立康唑、伊曲康唑口服混悬液或超生物利用度胶囊的吸收均有较高的负性食物效应(AUC或Cmax降低约40%)。抗酸剂强烈降低伊曲康唑和酮康唑的吸收,而营养补充剂提高泊沙康唑的生物利用度。如可口可乐等酸性饮料大大提高了伊曲康唑、酮康唑和泊沙康唑的吸收,而橙汁则显著降低了伊曲康唑的生物利用度。结论:相互作用受药物理化性质、饮食干预类型、药物配方和患者特点等因素的影响。尽管该综述在很大程度上填补了现有建议的空白,但由于研究过时、方法不一致和数据可用性不均衡,我们认为证据的总体质量较低。需要进一步研究PK/PD指标,将抗真菌药物餐后生物利用度变化与临床疗效联系起来。其他:该系统评价方案于2024年3月在开放科学框架(OSF)注册中心(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HAVK9)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacokinetics promotes the continuing development of clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for the improvement of drug therapy, and for furthering postgraduate education in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Pharmacokinetics, the study of drug disposition in the body, is an integral part of drug development and rational use. Knowledge and application of pharmacokinetic principles leads to accelerated drug development, cost effective drug use and a reduced frequency of adverse effects and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信