A machine learning toolkit assisted approach for IMRT fluence map optimization: feasibility and advantages.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xin Wu, Dongrong Yang, Yang Sheng, Qing-Rong Jackie Wu, Qiuwen Wu
{"title":"A machine learning toolkit assisted approach for IMRT fluence map optimization: feasibility and advantages.","authors":"Xin Wu, Dongrong Yang, Yang Sheng, Qing-Rong Jackie Wu, Qiuwen Wu","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/adcaca","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>. Traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) applications in treatment planning rely on complex model architectures and large, high-quality training datasets. However, they cannot fully replace the conventional optimization process. This study presents a novel application of ML in treatment planning where established ML/DL toolkits are directly applied to treatment plan optimization.<i>Materials and Methods</i>. A one-layer network was designed based on the dose deposition matrix and implemented in PyTorch's L-BFGS optimizer with GPU acceleration. The classical steepest descent optimizer was selected as a reference for comparison. Both optimizers utilized identical inputs and objective functions to ensure a fair comparison. DVH- and gEUD-based objectives were implemented in standard quadratic forms. Standard uniform and 1,000 random initializations were used to test optimizer's search ability under different starting conditions for prostate and head-and-neck cases.<i>Results</i>. The MLT-assisted framework demonstrated comparable or superior plan quality to classical optimization by achieving lower objective values, improved DVHs and capturing finer modulation details in fluence maps. For gEUD-based optimization, it effectively explored beam weight elevations that classical optimization could only reach with stricter convergence criteria and many more iterations. The quality differences primarily stemmed from convergence speed. The MLT-assisted framework required significantly fewer evaluations and iterations to achieve similar or better results. Optimization on random initial maps further demonstrated that it was more robust and less likely to be trapped. It does not require stricter convergence criteria or extended runs to reach high-quality optima, making it more efficient and reliable.<i>Conclusion</i>. This framework leverages ML toolkits in a novel way, enabling faster convergence, greater robustness and handling of complex constraints. As the first study of its kind, it establishes MLT-assisted optimization as a viable and effective alternative to classical methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adcaca","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. Traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) applications in treatment planning rely on complex model architectures and large, high-quality training datasets. However, they cannot fully replace the conventional optimization process. This study presents a novel application of ML in treatment planning where established ML/DL toolkits are directly applied to treatment plan optimization.Materials and Methods. A one-layer network was designed based on the dose deposition matrix and implemented in PyTorch's L-BFGS optimizer with GPU acceleration. The classical steepest descent optimizer was selected as a reference for comparison. Both optimizers utilized identical inputs and objective functions to ensure a fair comparison. DVH- and gEUD-based objectives were implemented in standard quadratic forms. Standard uniform and 1,000 random initializations were used to test optimizer's search ability under different starting conditions for prostate and head-and-neck cases.Results. The MLT-assisted framework demonstrated comparable or superior plan quality to classical optimization by achieving lower objective values, improved DVHs and capturing finer modulation details in fluence maps. For gEUD-based optimization, it effectively explored beam weight elevations that classical optimization could only reach with stricter convergence criteria and many more iterations. The quality differences primarily stemmed from convergence speed. The MLT-assisted framework required significantly fewer evaluations and iterations to achieve similar or better results. Optimization on random initial maps further demonstrated that it was more robust and less likely to be trapped. It does not require stricter convergence criteria or extended runs to reach high-quality optima, making it more efficient and reliable.Conclusion. This framework leverages ML toolkits in a novel way, enabling faster convergence, greater robustness and handling of complex constraints. As the first study of its kind, it establishes MLT-assisted optimization as a viable and effective alternative to classical methods.

一种机器学习工具箱辅助的IMRT影响力图优化方法:可行性与优势。
目的。传统的机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)在治疗计划中的应用依赖于复杂的模型架构和大型、高质量的训练数据集。然而,它们不能完全取代传统的优化过程。本研究提出了ML在治疗计划中的新应用,其中建立的ML/DL工具包直接应用于治疗计划优化。材料与方法。基于剂量沉积矩阵设计了一个单层网络,并在PyTorch的L-BFGS优化器中使用GPU加速实现。选择经典的最陡下降优化器作为参考进行比较。两个优化器使用相同的输入和目标函数来确保公平的比较。基于DVH和geud的目标以标准二次型实现。采用标准均匀初始化和1000个随机初始化来测试优化器在不同启动条件下对前列腺和头颈部病例的搜索能力。mlt辅助框架通过实现更低的目标值、改进的dvh和在影响图中捕获更精细的调制细节,显示出与经典优化相当或更好的计划质量。对于基于geud的优化,它有效地探索了经典优化只能通过更严格的收敛准则和更多的迭代才能达到的梁重标高。质量差异主要源于收敛速度。mlt辅助框架需要更少的评估和迭代来实现类似或更好的结果。在随机初始映射上的优化进一步证明了它的鲁棒性,并且更不容易被困住。它不需要更严格的收敛标准或延长运行时间来达到高质量的最优,使其更有效和可靠。该框架以一种新颖的方式利用ML工具包,实现更快的收敛、更强的鲁棒性和对复杂约束的处理。作为同类研究的第一个,它建立了mlt辅助优化作为一个可行的和有效的替代经典方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信