Understanding the first prescription: Clinical and demographic drivers of strong opioid use in primary care.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-30 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf053
Bishaal Tej Gurung, Louisa Picco, Grant Russell, Christopher Pearce, Suzanne Nielsen, Ting Xia
{"title":"Understanding the first prescription: Clinical and demographic drivers of strong opioid use in primary care.","authors":"Bishaal Tej Gurung, Louisa Picco, Grant Russell, Christopher Pearce, Suzanne Nielsen, Ting Xia","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the demographic and clinical factors which influence the initiation of weak versus strong opioids amongst opioid-naïve patients in Australian primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study focuses on opioid-naïve patients, defined as those receiving an eligible opioid prescription with no prior opioid prescriptions in the past year, using general practice data extracted in partnership with Primary Health Networks via the POpulation Level Analysis and Reporting (POLAR) platform. Opioid prescriptions at time of initiation were categorised as weak or strong. We used multivariate probit model analysis to identify the demographic and clinical factors associated with type of opioid at initiation of prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 415,098 opioid-naïve patients in primary care between January 1, 2018, and July 31, 2023, with 17% initiated on strong opioids. The probability of initiation with a strong opioid increased in patients over 80 years old by 25.0% (95%CI 0.244 to 0.257) compared to patients aged 20-29 years old. Patients with diagnoses of pain related to injury procedures (9.7% increase; 95%CI 0.093 to 0.101), or with prior antipsychotic prescriptions (6.2% increase; 95%CI 0.055 to 0.067), had higher probabilities of being prescribed strong opioids at the initiation compared to those without these conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One in six patients initiated on opioids in primary care were prescribed a strong opioid. This study highlights key factors associated with initiation of strong opioids among opioid-naïve patients. Further assessment of clinical suitability and outcomes associated with strong opioid prescribing can inform our understanding of opioid use in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf053","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the demographic and clinical factors which influence the initiation of weak versus strong opioids amongst opioid-naïve patients in Australian primary care settings.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study focuses on opioid-naïve patients, defined as those receiving an eligible opioid prescription with no prior opioid prescriptions in the past year, using general practice data extracted in partnership with Primary Health Networks via the POpulation Level Analysis and Reporting (POLAR) platform. Opioid prescriptions at time of initiation were categorised as weak or strong. We used multivariate probit model analysis to identify the demographic and clinical factors associated with type of opioid at initiation of prescribing.

Results: We identified 415,098 opioid-naïve patients in primary care between January 1, 2018, and July 31, 2023, with 17% initiated on strong opioids. The probability of initiation with a strong opioid increased in patients over 80 years old by 25.0% (95%CI 0.244 to 0.257) compared to patients aged 20-29 years old. Patients with diagnoses of pain related to injury procedures (9.7% increase; 95%CI 0.093 to 0.101), or with prior antipsychotic prescriptions (6.2% increase; 95%CI 0.055 to 0.067), had higher probabilities of being prescribed strong opioids at the initiation compared to those without these conditions.

Conclusion: One in six patients initiated on opioids in primary care were prescribed a strong opioid. This study highlights key factors associated with initiation of strong opioids among opioid-naïve patients. Further assessment of clinical suitability and outcomes associated with strong opioid prescribing can inform our understanding of opioid use in primary care.

了解第一个处方:初级保健中阿片类药物强烈使用的临床和人口驱动因素。
目的:评估澳大利亚初级保健机构opioid-naïve患者中影响弱与强阿片类药物起始的人口统计学和临床因素。方法:这项回顾性队列研究的重点是opioid-naïve患者,定义为在过去一年中接受合格阿片类药物处方且没有阿片类药物处方的患者,使用通过人口水平分析和报告(POLAR)平台与初级卫生网络合作提取的一般实践数据。阿片类药物处方在开始时被分类为弱或强。我们使用多变量概率模型分析来确定与处方开始时阿片类药物类型相关的人口学和临床因素。结果:我们在2018年1月1日至2023年7月31日期间确定了415098名opioid-naïve初级保健患者,其中17%开始使用强阿片类药物。与20-29岁的患者相比,80岁以上患者开始使用强阿片类药物的可能性增加了25.0% (95%CI 0.244至0.257)。诊断为与损伤过程相关的疼痛的患者(增加9.7%;95%CI 0.093 ~ 0.101),或既往有抗精神病药物处方(增加6.2%;95%CI 0.055 ~ 0.067),与没有这些条件的患者相比,在开始时服用强阿片类药物的可能性更高。结论:六分之一在初级保健中开始使用阿片类药物的患者开了强阿片类药物。这项研究强调了opioid-naïve患者中与强阿片类药物启动相关的关键因素。进一步评估与强阿片类药物处方相关的临床适用性和结果,可以帮助我们了解阿片类药物在初级保健中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信