Direct Comparison of EEG Resting State and Task Functional Connectivity Patterns for Predicting Working Memory Performance Using Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain connectivity Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1089/brain.2024.0059
Anton Pashkov, Ivan Dakhtin
{"title":"Direct Comparison of EEG Resting State and Task Functional Connectivity Patterns for Predicting Working Memory Performance Using Connectome-Based Predictive Modeling.","authors":"Anton Pashkov, Ivan Dakhtin","doi":"10.1089/brain.2024.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The integration of machine learning with advanced neuroimaging has emerged as a powerful approach for uncovering the relationship between neuronal activity patterns and behavioral traits. While resting-state neuroimaging has significantly contributed to understanding the neural basis of cognition, recent fMRI studies suggest that task-based paradigms may offer superior predictive power for cognitive outcomes. However, this hypothesis has never been tested using electroencephalography (EEG) data. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted the first experimental comparison of predictive models built on high-density EEG data recorded during both resting-state and an auditory working memory task. Multiple data processing pipelines were employed to ensure robustness and reliability. Model performance was evaluated by computing the Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and observed behavioral scores, supplemented by mean absolute error and root mean square error metrics for each model configuration. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Consistent with prior fMRI findings, task-based EEG data yielded slightly better modeling performance than resting-state data. Both conditions demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with peak correlations between observed and predicted values reaching r = 0.5. Alpha and beta band functional connectivity were the strongest predictors of working memory performance, followed by theta and gamma bands. Additionally, the choice of parcellation atlas and connectivity method significantly influenced results, highlighting the importance of methodological considerations. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our findings support the advantage of task-based EEG over resting-state data in predicting cognitive performance, aligning with. The study underscores the critical role of frequency-specific functional connectivity and methodological choices in model performance. These insights should guide future experimental designs in cognitive neuroscience. Impact Statement This study provides the first direct comparison of EEG-based functional connectivity during rest and task conditions for predicting working memory performance using connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM). It demonstrates that task-based EEG data slightly outperforms resting-state data, with alpha and beta bands being the most predictive. The findings highlight the critical influence of methodological choices, such as parcellation atlases and connectivity metrics, on model outcomes. By bridging gaps in EEG research and validating CPM's applicability, this work advances the optimization of neuroimaging protocols for cognitive assessment, offering insights for future studies in cognitive neuroscience.</p>","PeriodicalId":9155,"journal":{"name":"Brain connectivity","volume":"15 4","pages":"175-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain connectivity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2024.0059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of machine learning with advanced neuroimaging has emerged as a powerful approach for uncovering the relationship between neuronal activity patterns and behavioral traits. While resting-state neuroimaging has significantly contributed to understanding the neural basis of cognition, recent fMRI studies suggest that task-based paradigms may offer superior predictive power for cognitive outcomes. However, this hypothesis has never been tested using electroencephalography (EEG) data. Methods: We conducted the first experimental comparison of predictive models built on high-density EEG data recorded during both resting-state and an auditory working memory task. Multiple data processing pipelines were employed to ensure robustness and reliability. Model performance was evaluated by computing the Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and observed behavioral scores, supplemented by mean absolute error and root mean square error metrics for each model configuration. Results: Consistent with prior fMRI findings, task-based EEG data yielded slightly better modeling performance than resting-state data. Both conditions demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with peak correlations between observed and predicted values reaching r = 0.5. Alpha and beta band functional connectivity were the strongest predictors of working memory performance, followed by theta and gamma bands. Additionally, the choice of parcellation atlas and connectivity method significantly influenced results, highlighting the importance of methodological considerations. Conclusion: Our findings support the advantage of task-based EEG over resting-state data in predicting cognitive performance, aligning with. The study underscores the critical role of frequency-specific functional connectivity and methodological choices in model performance. These insights should guide future experimental designs in cognitive neuroscience. Impact Statement This study provides the first direct comparison of EEG-based functional connectivity during rest and task conditions for predicting working memory performance using connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM). It demonstrates that task-based EEG data slightly outperforms resting-state data, with alpha and beta bands being the most predictive. The findings highlight the critical influence of methodological choices, such as parcellation atlases and connectivity metrics, on model outcomes. By bridging gaps in EEG research and validating CPM's applicability, this work advances the optimization of neuroimaging protocols for cognitive assessment, offering insights for future studies in cognitive neuroscience.

脑电静息状态和任务功能连接模式对工作记忆性能预测的直接比较。
背景:机器学习与高级神经成像的结合已经成为揭示神经元活动模式和行为特征之间关系的有力方法。虽然静息状态神经成像对理解认知的神经基础做出了重大贡献,但最近的功能磁共振成像研究表明,基于任务的范式可能对认知结果提供更好的预测能力。然而,这一假设从未使用脑电图(EEG)数据进行验证。方法:对静息状态下和听觉工作记忆任务下高密度脑电数据建立的预测模型进行了首次实验比较。采用多个数据处理管道,保证鲁棒性和可靠性。通过计算预测和观察行为评分之间的Pearson相关系数来评估模型性能,并辅以每种模型配置的平均绝对误差和均方根误差指标。结果:与先前的fMRI发现一致,基于任务的EEG数据比静息状态数据的建模性能略好。两种情况都显示出很高的预测精度,观测值和预测值之间的峰值相关性达到r = 0.5。α和β波段功能连通性是工作记忆表现的最强预测因子,其次是θ和γ波段。此外,包裹图谱和连通性方法的选择显著影响结果,突出了方法学考虑的重要性。结论:我们的研究结果支持基于任务的脑电图在预测认知表现方面优于静息状态数据。该研究强调了特定频率的功能连接和方法选择在模型性能中的关键作用。这些见解应该指导未来认知神经科学的实验设计。本研究首次直接比较了休息和任务条件下基于脑电图的功能连通性,利用基于连接体的预测模型(CPM)预测工作记忆的表现。这表明基于任务的脑电图数据略优于静息状态数据,α和β波段是最具预测性的。研究结果强调了方法选择对模型结果的关键影响,例如包裹地图集和连通性指标。通过弥合脑电图研究的空白和验证CPM的适用性,本研究推进了认知评估的神经成像方案的优化,为未来的认知神经科学研究提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain connectivity
Brain connectivity Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Brain Connectivity provides groundbreaking findings in the rapidly advancing field of connectivity research at the systems and network levels. The Journal disseminates information on brain mapping, modeling, novel research techniques, new imaging modalities, preclinical animal studies, and the translation of research discoveries from the laboratory to the clinic. This essential journal fosters the application of basic biological discoveries and contributes to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to recognize and treat a broad range of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders such as: Alzheimer’s disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, stroke, dementia, and depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信