That's the Way (I like It): Latent Profiles of Sexual Power Dynamics and Gender Roles.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1080/0092623X.2025.2492859
Roxanne Bolduc, Cloé Canivet, Martine Hébert, Natacha Godbout
{"title":"<i>That's the Way</i> (<i>I like It</i>): Latent Profiles of Sexual Power Dynamics and Gender Roles.","authors":"Roxanne Bolduc, Cloé Canivet, Martine Hébert, Natacha Godbout","doi":"10.1080/0092623X.2025.2492859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual power dynamics (SPD) regroup sexual interests of dominance, submission, and tender sex. Interest toward sexual domination and/or submission has historically been pathologized and linked with higher levels of sexo-relational distress. Guided by sexual script theory, the consideration of one's attitudes toward gender roles (GR), as either gender transcendent or gender-linked, might help identify different profiles of clients in sex therapy. To our knowledge, studies have yet to explore the different profiles while considering both SPD and GR. The scarcity of research on these variables limits our understanding of their implications for individuals' sexo-relational well-being. The current study aimed to explore the presence of latent profiles based on SPD and GR reported by clients in sex therapy, and to compare the resulting profiles on possible correlates (i.e., sociodemographic characteristics, romantic attachment, relationship and sexual satisfaction). A sample of 325 adults in sex therapy, completed self-reported questionnaires at intake. Results revealed three profiles: (1) <i>Dominant stereotypical thinkers</i> (3.7%), (2) <i>Tender conflicted traditionalists</i> (15.4%), and (3) <i>Flexible and coherent lovers</i> (80.9%). Inter-profile comparisons revealed significant differences regarding gender, age, avoidant attachment and relationship satisfaction. Overall, results suggest the presence of an intricacy between SPD and GR, which would benefit from further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":17171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","volume":"51 4","pages":"426-443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2025.2492859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual power dynamics (SPD) regroup sexual interests of dominance, submission, and tender sex. Interest toward sexual domination and/or submission has historically been pathologized and linked with higher levels of sexo-relational distress. Guided by sexual script theory, the consideration of one's attitudes toward gender roles (GR), as either gender transcendent or gender-linked, might help identify different profiles of clients in sex therapy. To our knowledge, studies have yet to explore the different profiles while considering both SPD and GR. The scarcity of research on these variables limits our understanding of their implications for individuals' sexo-relational well-being. The current study aimed to explore the presence of latent profiles based on SPD and GR reported by clients in sex therapy, and to compare the resulting profiles on possible correlates (i.e., sociodemographic characteristics, romantic attachment, relationship and sexual satisfaction). A sample of 325 adults in sex therapy, completed self-reported questionnaires at intake. Results revealed three profiles: (1) Dominant stereotypical thinkers (3.7%), (2) Tender conflicted traditionalists (15.4%), and (3) Flexible and coherent lovers (80.9%). Inter-profile comparisons revealed significant differences regarding gender, age, avoidant attachment and relationship satisfaction. Overall, results suggest the presence of an intricacy between SPD and GR, which would benefit from further exploration.

这就是(我喜欢它):性权力动态和性别角色的潜在概况。
性权力动力学(SPD)重新组合了支配性、顺从性和温柔性的性兴趣。对性支配和/或服从的兴趣历来被病态化,并与更高程度的性关系痛苦联系在一起。在性剧本理论的指导下,考虑一个人对性别角色(GR)的态度,要么是性别超越的,要么是与性别相关的,可能有助于识别性治疗中来访者的不同特征。据我们所知,在考虑SPD和GR的同时,研究还没有探索不同的概况。对这些变量的研究的缺乏限制了我们对它们对个人性关系幸福的影响的理解。本研究旨在探讨在性治疗中客户报告的基于SPD和GR的潜在特征的存在,并比较可能的相关特征(即社会人口特征、浪漫依恋、关系和性满意度)。325名接受性治疗的成年人在接受性治疗时完成了自我报告问卷。结果显示:(1)占主导地位的刻板思考者(3.7%),(2)温柔冲突的传统主义者(15.4%),(3)灵活连贯的恋人(80.9%)。在性别、年龄、回避型依恋和关系满意度方面存在显著差异。总的来说,结果表明SPD和GR之间存在复杂性,这将有利于进一步的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy is one of the top independent journals in the field. Under the prestigious leadership of R. Taylor Seagraves, M.D. - one of the world" foremost experts in sex and marital therapy -- JSMT is an active and contemporary forum reflecting the most viable developments emanating from the U.S. and abroad. JSMT continues to break new ground with innovative research and clinical writing, and the editor is committed to showcasing the most far-reaching traditional and contemporary thinking from all sources. You will read about therapeutic techniques, outcome, special clinical and medical problems, and the theoretical parameters of sexual functioning, and marital relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信