Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy in Patients with Early or Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study in an Asian Population.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2025-05-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S485171
Hung-Kai Chen, Kai-Cheng Chang, Shih-Chieh Shao, Ruey-Shyang Soong, Yi-Chan Chen, Chun-Feng Wu, Tsung-Han Wu, Tien-Shin Chou, Siu-Cheung Chan, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
{"title":"Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy in Patients with Early or Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study in an Asian Population.","authors":"Hung-Kai Chen, Kai-Cheng Chang, Shih-Chieh Shao, Ruey-Shyang Soong, Yi-Chan Chen, Chun-Feng Wu, Tsung-Han Wu, Tien-Shin Chou, Siu-Cheung Chan, Edward Chia-Cheng Lai","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S485171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) has been increasingly applied for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effectiveness of MIH has yet to be well established.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 20 years and older, newly receiving MIH for HCC with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification stage 0, A or B from 2010 to 2019. Two 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts of those receiving open hepatectomy (OH) and those receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were selected as comparison groups. As a control analysis, we compared patients receiving OH with those receiving RFA under the hypothesis that the OH group had better survival outcomes than the RFA group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included a total of 555 matched patients receiving MIH or OH, and 382 matched patients receiving MIH or RFA. Compared to the OH group, MIH group was associated with better overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratios (HR): 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.88) and similar PFS (HR: 0.92; 0.74-1.16). Compared to the RFA group, we found the MIH group was associated with better OS (0.46; 0.32-0.67) and better PFS (0.48; 0.38-0.61). We found consistent results from a series of subgroup analyses (eg, age groups, BCLC stages and hospital levels) and sensitivity analyses (eg, study period restricted to the most recent 5 years (2015-2019)). The control analysis (OH group vs RFA group) confirmed the robustness of main analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggested that MIH had better survival outcomes for patients with early or resectable intermediate-stage HCC, compared to RFA or OH.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"12 ","pages":"879-890"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S485171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) has been increasingly applied for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effectiveness of MIH has yet to be well established.

Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 20 years and older, newly receiving MIH for HCC with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification stage 0, A or B from 2010 to 2019. Two 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts of those receiving open hepatectomy (OH) and those receiving radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were selected as comparison groups. As a control analysis, we compared patients receiving OH with those receiving RFA under the hypothesis that the OH group had better survival outcomes than the RFA group.

Results: We included a total of 555 matched patients receiving MIH or OH, and 382 matched patients receiving MIH or RFA. Compared to the OH group, MIH group was associated with better overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratios (HR): 0.62; 95% CI: 0.43-0.88) and similar PFS (HR: 0.92; 0.74-1.16). Compared to the RFA group, we found the MIH group was associated with better OS (0.46; 0.32-0.67) and better PFS (0.48; 0.38-0.61). We found consistent results from a series of subgroup analyses (eg, age groups, BCLC stages and hospital levels) and sensitivity analyses (eg, study period restricted to the most recent 5 years (2015-2019)). The control analysis (OH group vs RFA group) confirmed the robustness of main analyses.

Conclusion: Our study suggested that MIH had better survival outcomes for patients with early or resectable intermediate-stage HCC, compared to RFA or OH.

微创肝切除术治疗早期或中期肝细胞癌的有效性:一项亚洲人群的多机构队列研究
目的:微创肝切除术(MIH)在肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中的应用越来越广泛。然而,MIH的有效性尚未得到充分证实。患者和方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了2010年至2019年年龄在20岁及以上,新接受MIH治疗的巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期0、A或B期HCC患者。选择两个1:1倾向评分匹配的接受开放式肝切除术(OH)和接受射频消融(RFA)的队列作为对照组。作为对照分析,我们在假设OH组比RFA组有更好的生存结果的前提下,比较了OH组和RFA组的患者。结果:我们共纳入555名接受MIH或OH的匹配患者,382名接受MIH或RFA的匹配患者。与OH组相比,MIH组有更好的总生存期(OS)(风险比(HR): 0.62;95% CI: 0.43-0.88)和相似的PFS (HR: 0.92;0.74 - -1.16)。与RFA组相比,我们发现MIH组与更好的OS相关(0.46;0.32-0.67)和较好的PFS (0.48;0.38 - -0.61)。我们从一系列亚组分析(例如,年龄组、BCLC分期和医院级别)和敏感性分析(例如,研究期限于最近5年(2015-2019))中发现了一致的结果。对照分析(OH组与RFA组)证实了主分析的稳健性。结论:我们的研究表明,与RFA或OH相比,MIH对早期或可切除的中期HCC患者有更好的生存结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信