Development and Validation of the UriMee Model: A Methylation-based Diagnostic Tool for Early Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Ming Cao, Guoliang Yang, Tingting Zhao, Lianhua Zhang, Dandan Wang, Yang Cao, Haige Chen, Di Jin, Ruiyun Zhang, Yuping Hao, Longfei Huang, Wei Liu, Yang Zhang, Na Xue, Wei Xue
{"title":"Development and Validation of the UriMee Model: A Methylation-based Diagnostic Tool for Early Diagnosis of Urothelial Carcinoma.","authors":"Ming Cao, Guoliang Yang, Tingting Zhao, Lianhua Zhang, Dandan Wang, Yang Cao, Haige Chen, Di Jin, Ruiyun Zhang, Yuping Hao, Longfei Huang, Wei Liu, Yang Zhang, Na Xue, Wei Xue","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common malignancy that imposes a significant health care burden. Current diagnostic methods are limited by their invasiveness and low sensitivity, particularly for detecting low-grade tumors. Noninvasive, accurate, and reliable diagnostic tests for an early diagnosis of UC are urgently needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>UC-specific DNA methylation biomarkers were identified by combining public datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus with a cohort from Renji Hospital (n = 50). Using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression, we developed a diagnostic model, termed the UriMee model, by selecting key biomarkers from a model cohort (n = 322) and subsequently validating it in an independent cohort (n = 131). The diagnostic performance of the assay was evaluated and compared with that of urine cytology.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>At 30% threshold probability, the UriMee model demonstrated high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (92%) in distinguishing UC cases, with particularly strong performance in early-stage tumors (83% sensitivity for Ta, 93% for T1, and 100% for Tis). It significantly outperformed urine cytology, offering greater sensitivity (90% vs 25%, p < 0.001) while maintaining comparable specificity. Additionally, the model was highly effective in identifying upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), achieving sensitivity of 96%. The study's limitations include the necessity for larger multicenter studies and long-term follow-up to validate the findings and assess the test's effectiveness across diverse populations, as well as its utility in monitoring disease progression and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UriMee test demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in detecting early-stage tumors and UTUC, significantly outperforming traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.03.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a common malignancy that imposes a significant health care burden. Current diagnostic methods are limited by their invasiveness and low sensitivity, particularly for detecting low-grade tumors. Noninvasive, accurate, and reliable diagnostic tests for an early diagnosis of UC are urgently needed.

Methods: UC-specific DNA methylation biomarkers were identified by combining public datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus with a cohort from Renji Hospital (n = 50). Using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression, we developed a diagnostic model, termed the UriMee model, by selecting key biomarkers from a model cohort (n = 322) and subsequently validating it in an independent cohort (n = 131). The diagnostic performance of the assay was evaluated and compared with that of urine cytology.

Key findings and limitations: At 30% threshold probability, the UriMee model demonstrated high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (92%) in distinguishing UC cases, with particularly strong performance in early-stage tumors (83% sensitivity for Ta, 93% for T1, and 100% for Tis). It significantly outperformed urine cytology, offering greater sensitivity (90% vs 25%, p < 0.001) while maintaining comparable specificity. Additionally, the model was highly effective in identifying upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), achieving sensitivity of 96%. The study's limitations include the necessity for larger multicenter studies and long-term follow-up to validate the findings and assess the test's effectiveness across diverse populations, as well as its utility in monitoring disease progression and recurrence.

Conclusions: The UriMee test demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in detecting early-stage tumors and UTUC, significantly outperforming traditional methods.

UriMee模型的开发和验证:一种基于甲基化的尿路上皮癌早期诊断工具。
背景和目的:尿路上皮癌(UC)是一种常见的恶性肿瘤,造成了重大的医疗负担。目前的诊断方法受其侵入性和低灵敏度的限制,特别是在检测低级别肿瘤时。迫切需要无创、准确、可靠的UC早期诊断测试。方法:结合来自癌症基因组图谱和基因表达综合数据库的公共数据集以及来自仁集医院的队列(n = 50),鉴定uc特异性DNA甲基化生物标志物。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归,我们通过从模型队列(n = 322)中选择关键生物标志物,随后在独立队列(n = 131)中验证,开发了一个诊断模型,称为UriMee模型。评价了该检测的诊断性能,并与尿细胞学检测进行了比较。主要发现和局限性:在30%的阈值概率下,UriMee模型在区分UC病例方面表现出高灵敏度(92%)和特异性(92%),在早期肿瘤中表现尤其突出(Ta敏感性83%,T1敏感性93%,Tis敏感性100%)。结论:UriMee检测具有较高的灵敏度和特异性,特别是在检测早期肿瘤和UTUC方面,明显优于传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信