Closing the equity gap as we approach zero seclusion: Successes of the quality improvement project some doubted could be done.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Clive Bensemann, Jess Drummond, Karen O'Keeffe, Arana Pearson, Jacqueline Ryan, Carl Shuker, Karl Wairama, Wi Keelan
{"title":"Closing the equity gap as we approach zero seclusion: Successes of the quality improvement project some doubted could be done.","authors":"Clive Bensemann, Jess Drummond, Karen O'Keeffe, Arana Pearson, Jacqueline Ryan, Carl Shuker, Karl Wairama, Wi Keelan","doi":"10.1177/10398562251330072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveUse of seclusion (in particular inequitable use) continues in mental health services in many countries, despite evidence against it and substantial endeavour to reduce or eliminate it. Aotearoa New Zealand's national quality improvement agency Te Tāhū Hauora Health Quality & Safety Commission has since 2018 led a project to eliminate use of seclusion in mental health inpatient units.MethodThe 'Zero Seclusion: Safety and dignity for all' project co-designed a bicultural change package and implemented it nationwide in a formative collaborative with clinical teams, consumers, families, and whānau. Outcome measures included seclusion rates, duration, and average number of episodes, by ethnicity, with a focus on equity.ResultsFrom a baseline mean of 6.4% of mental health service consumers secluded monthly in the 12 months to September 2019, the mean rate of seclusion reduced to 4.3% by June 2024. The seclusion rate of Māori mental health service consumers fell from 9.9% to 6.0%, and of non-Māori/non-Pacific consumers from 4.0% to 2.3%.ConclusionReduction and elimination of seclusion, especially its inequitable use with indigenous populations, is possible. True co-design, strong leadership, partnership with indigenous populations and those most affected, and an embrace of robust measurement were critical to these good results.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562251330072"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251330072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveUse of seclusion (in particular inequitable use) continues in mental health services in many countries, despite evidence against it and substantial endeavour to reduce or eliminate it. Aotearoa New Zealand's national quality improvement agency Te Tāhū Hauora Health Quality & Safety Commission has since 2018 led a project to eliminate use of seclusion in mental health inpatient units.MethodThe 'Zero Seclusion: Safety and dignity for all' project co-designed a bicultural change package and implemented it nationwide in a formative collaborative with clinical teams, consumers, families, and whānau. Outcome measures included seclusion rates, duration, and average number of episodes, by ethnicity, with a focus on equity.ResultsFrom a baseline mean of 6.4% of mental health service consumers secluded monthly in the 12 months to September 2019, the mean rate of seclusion reduced to 4.3% by June 2024. The seclusion rate of Māori mental health service consumers fell from 9.9% to 6.0%, and of non-Māori/non-Pacific consumers from 4.0% to 2.3%.ConclusionReduction and elimination of seclusion, especially its inequitable use with indigenous populations, is possible. True co-design, strong leadership, partnership with indigenous populations and those most affected, and an embrace of robust measurement were critical to these good results.

在接近零隔离的过程中缩小公平差距:一些人怀疑的质量改进项目能否成功。
在许多国家的精神卫生服务中,隔离的使用(特别是不公平的使用)仍在继续,尽管有证据反对这种做法,并为减少或消除这种做法作出了重大努力。自2018年以来,新西兰国家质量改进机构Tāhū Hauora健康质量与安全委员会领导了一个项目,以消除精神卫生住院病房中隔离的使用。方法“零隔离:人人享有安全和尊严”项目与临床团队、消费者、家庭和whānau共同设计了一套双文化变革方案,并在全国范围内实施。结果测量包括隔离率、持续时间和平均发作次数,按种族划分,重点是公平性。结果截至2019年9月的12个月,平均每月有6.4%的心理健康服务消费者隐居,到2024年6月,平均隐居率降至4.3%。Māori心理健康服务消费者的隔离率从9.9%下降到6.0%,non-Māori/非太平洋消费者的隔离率从4.0%下降到2.3%。结论减少和消除隔离,特别是在土著居民中不公平使用隔离是可能的。真正的共同设计、强有力的领导、与土著居民和受影响最严重的人的伙伴关系,以及采用强有力的测量方法,是取得这些良好成果的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Psychiatry
Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
159
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信