Clive Bensemann, Jess Drummond, Karen O'Keeffe, Arana Pearson, Jacqueline Ryan, Carl Shuker, Karl Wairama, Wi Keelan
{"title":"Closing the equity gap as we approach zero seclusion: Successes of the quality improvement project some doubted could be done.","authors":"Clive Bensemann, Jess Drummond, Karen O'Keeffe, Arana Pearson, Jacqueline Ryan, Carl Shuker, Karl Wairama, Wi Keelan","doi":"10.1177/10398562251330072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveUse of seclusion (in particular inequitable use) continues in mental health services in many countries, despite evidence against it and substantial endeavour to reduce or eliminate it. Aotearoa New Zealand's national quality improvement agency Te Tāhū Hauora Health Quality & Safety Commission has since 2018 led a project to eliminate use of seclusion in mental health inpatient units.MethodThe 'Zero Seclusion: Safety and dignity for all' project co-designed a bicultural change package and implemented it nationwide in a formative collaborative with clinical teams, consumers, families, and whānau. Outcome measures included seclusion rates, duration, and average number of episodes, by ethnicity, with a focus on equity.ResultsFrom a baseline mean of 6.4% of mental health service consumers secluded monthly in the 12 months to September 2019, the mean rate of seclusion reduced to 4.3% by June 2024. The seclusion rate of Māori mental health service consumers fell from 9.9% to 6.0%, and of non-Māori/non-Pacific consumers from 4.0% to 2.3%.ConclusionReduction and elimination of seclusion, especially its inequitable use with indigenous populations, is possible. True co-design, strong leadership, partnership with indigenous populations and those most affected, and an embrace of robust measurement were critical to these good results.</p>","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"10398562251330072"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562251330072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveUse of seclusion (in particular inequitable use) continues in mental health services in many countries, despite evidence against it and substantial endeavour to reduce or eliminate it. Aotearoa New Zealand's national quality improvement agency Te Tāhū Hauora Health Quality & Safety Commission has since 2018 led a project to eliminate use of seclusion in mental health inpatient units.MethodThe 'Zero Seclusion: Safety and dignity for all' project co-designed a bicultural change package and implemented it nationwide in a formative collaborative with clinical teams, consumers, families, and whānau. Outcome measures included seclusion rates, duration, and average number of episodes, by ethnicity, with a focus on equity.ResultsFrom a baseline mean of 6.4% of mental health service consumers secluded monthly in the 12 months to September 2019, the mean rate of seclusion reduced to 4.3% by June 2024. The seclusion rate of Māori mental health service consumers fell from 9.9% to 6.0%, and of non-Māori/non-Pacific consumers from 4.0% to 2.3%.ConclusionReduction and elimination of seclusion, especially its inequitable use with indigenous populations, is possible. True co-design, strong leadership, partnership with indigenous populations and those most affected, and an embrace of robust measurement were critical to these good results.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.