Efficacy of adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA cutaneous melanoma.

IF 56.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
P Grover, S N Lo, I Li, A M J Kuijpers, F Kreidieh, A Williamson, T Amaral, F Dimitriou, J Placzke, K Olino, M G Vitale, P Saiag, R Gutzmer, C Allayous, R Olofsson Bagge, J Mattsson, N Asher, T J Carter, T M Meniawy, A R Lawless, J A Czapla, L Warburton, C Gaudy-Marqueste, J J Grob, R G Collins, E Zhang, J I Kessels, B Neyns, I Mehmi, O Hamid, M Julve, A J S Furness, K A Margolin, S Lev-Ari, J M Ressler, W Haque, M A Khattak, A Wicky, R Roberts-Thomson, A Arance, G Warrier, M D Schollenberger, P Parente, E Chatziioannou, E J Lipson, O Michielin, J S Weber, C Hoeller, J Larkin, M B Atkins, R Essner, D B Johnson, R J Sullivan, P Nathan, J Schachter, C Lebbe, P A Ascierto, H Kluger, P Rutkowski, R Dummer, C Garbe, P C Lorigan, E Burton, H A Tawbi, J Haanen, M S Carlino, A M Menzies, G V Long
{"title":"Efficacy of adjuvant therapy in patients with stage IIIA cutaneous melanoma.","authors":"P Grover, S N Lo, I Li, A M J Kuijpers, F Kreidieh, A Williamson, T Amaral, F Dimitriou, J Placzke, K Olino, M G Vitale, P Saiag, R Gutzmer, C Allayous, R Olofsson Bagge, J Mattsson, N Asher, T J Carter, T M Meniawy, A R Lawless, J A Czapla, L Warburton, C Gaudy-Marqueste, J J Grob, R G Collins, E Zhang, J I Kessels, B Neyns, I Mehmi, O Hamid, M Julve, A J S Furness, K A Margolin, S Lev-Ari, J M Ressler, W Haque, M A Khattak, A Wicky, R Roberts-Thomson, A Arance, G Warrier, M D Schollenberger, P Parente, E Chatziioannou, E J Lipson, O Michielin, J S Weber, C Hoeller, J Larkin, M B Atkins, R Essner, D B Johnson, R J Sullivan, P Nathan, J Schachter, C Lebbe, P A Ascierto, H Kluger, P Rutkowski, R Dummer, C Garbe, P C Lorigan, E Burton, H A Tawbi, J Haanen, M S Carlino, A M Menzies, G V Long","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition (AJCC v8) stage IIIA melanoma have been underrepresented in clinical trials of adjuvant drug therapy. The benefit of adjuvant targeted therapy and immunotherapy in this population is unclear.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this multicentre, retrospective study, patients with stage IIIA melanoma (AJCC v8) who received adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab [anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)], BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy dabrafenib + trametinib (TT) or no adjuvant treatment [observation (OBS)] were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and toxicity rates were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 628 patients from 34 centres across Australia, Europe and the United States were identified-256 in anti-PD-1, 80 in TT and 292 in OBS. The median follow-up was 2.6 years (interquartile range 1.6-3.4 years). The presence of some key poor prognostic variables was significantly higher in anti-PD-1 compared with OBS. The 2-year RFS was 79.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 74.1% to 84.8%] for anti-PD-1, 98.6% (95% CI 96.0% to 100%) for TT and 84.3% (95% CI 79.9% to 89.0%) for OBS. The 2-year DMFS was 88.4% (95% CI 84.3% to 92.8%) in anti-PD-1, 100% in TT and 91.1% (95% CI 87.7% to 94.7%) in OBS. Higher Breslow thickness and higher mitotic rate were associated with higher risk of recurrence in anti-PD-1 and OBS (P < 0.05). Rates of ≥grade 3 toxicities were 10.9% with anti-PD-1 and 17.5% with TT; discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 13.3% and 21.2%, respectively. Rates of unresolved toxicity at last follow-up were 26.9% in the anti-PD-1 group and 12.5% in the TT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stage IIIA melanoma has a modest risk of recurrence. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 did not significantly improve RFS or DMFS compared with OBS alone. Adjuvant TT appears promising over anti-PD-1 or OBS. Outcomes after adjuvant therapy in this population needs further study in larger datasets with longer follow-up or prospective randomised trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":56.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.03.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition (AJCC v8) stage IIIA melanoma have been underrepresented in clinical trials of adjuvant drug therapy. The benefit of adjuvant targeted therapy and immunotherapy in this population is unclear.

Patients and methods: In this multicentre, retrospective study, patients with stage IIIA melanoma (AJCC v8) who received adjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab [anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)], BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy dabrafenib + trametinib (TT) or no adjuvant treatment [observation (OBS)] were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and toxicity rates were examined.

Results: A total of 628 patients from 34 centres across Australia, Europe and the United States were identified-256 in anti-PD-1, 80 in TT and 292 in OBS. The median follow-up was 2.6 years (interquartile range 1.6-3.4 years). The presence of some key poor prognostic variables was significantly higher in anti-PD-1 compared with OBS. The 2-year RFS was 79.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 74.1% to 84.8%] for anti-PD-1, 98.6% (95% CI 96.0% to 100%) for TT and 84.3% (95% CI 79.9% to 89.0%) for OBS. The 2-year DMFS was 88.4% (95% CI 84.3% to 92.8%) in anti-PD-1, 100% in TT and 91.1% (95% CI 87.7% to 94.7%) in OBS. Higher Breslow thickness and higher mitotic rate were associated with higher risk of recurrence in anti-PD-1 and OBS (P < 0.05). Rates of ≥grade 3 toxicities were 10.9% with anti-PD-1 and 17.5% with TT; discontinuation due to toxicity occurred in 13.3% and 21.2%, respectively. Rates of unresolved toxicity at last follow-up were 26.9% in the anti-PD-1 group and 12.5% in the TT group.

Conclusions: Stage IIIA melanoma has a modest risk of recurrence. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 did not significantly improve RFS or DMFS compared with OBS alone. Adjuvant TT appears promising over anti-PD-1 or OBS. Outcomes after adjuvant therapy in this population needs further study in larger datasets with longer follow-up or prospective randomised trials.

辅助治疗在IIIA期皮肤黑色素瘤患者中的疗效。
背景:美国癌症联合委员会第8版(AJCC v8) iii期黑色素瘤切除患者在辅助药物治疗的临床试验中代表性不足。辅助靶向治疗和免疫治疗在这一人群中的益处尚不清楚。患者和方法:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,IIIA期黑色素瘤(AJCC v8)患者接受了辅助治疗派姆单抗或纳武单抗(抗pd1), BRAF/ mek靶向治疗dabrafenib + trametinib (TT)或无辅助治疗(OBS)。检查无复发生存期(RFS)、无远处转移生存期(DMFS)和毒性率。结果:来自澳大利亚、欧洲和美国34个中心的628例患者被鉴定出来,其中抗pd1患者256例,TT患者80例,OBS患者292例。中位随访时间为2.6年(IQR, 1.6-3.4年)。与OBS相比,抗pd1患者存在一些关键的不良预后变量。抗pd1的两年RFS为79.3% (95% CI, 74.1-84.8), TT为98.6% (95% CI, 96.0-100), OBS为84.3% (95% CI, 79.0 -89.0)。抗pd1的两年DMFS为88.4% (95% CI, 84.3-92.8), TT为100%,OBS为91.1% (95% CI, 87.7-94.7)。更高的brreslow厚度和更高的有丝分裂率与抗pd1和OBS的更高复发风险相关(结论:IIIA期黑色素瘤具有中等复发风险。与单独使用OBS相比,辅助抗pd1没有显著改善RFS或DMFS。与抗pd1或OBS相比,辅助TT似乎更有希望。该人群辅助治疗后的结果需要在更大的数据集、更长时间的随访或前瞻性随机试验中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Oncology
Annals of Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
63.90
自引率
1.00%
发文量
3712
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine. The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings. Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信