The impact of the number of sessions and stimulation parameters on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation efficacy for post-stroke upper extremity recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-13 DOI:10.1177/02692155251328945
Gabriel Barreto, Paz Sánchez, Rebeca Dias, Adriana Baltar, Lívia Shirahige, Rodrigo Fragoso de Andrade, Kelly Sukar Cavalcanti de Oliveira, Carlos Alberto Santana, Daniele Piscitelli, Kátia Monte-Silva
{"title":"The impact of the number of sessions and stimulation parameters on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation efficacy for post-stroke upper extremity recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gabriel Barreto, Paz Sánchez, Rebeca Dias, Adriana Baltar, Lívia Shirahige, Rodrigo Fragoso de Andrade, Kelly Sukar Cavalcanti de Oliveira, Carlos Alberto Santana, Daniele Piscitelli, Kátia Monte-Silva","doi":"10.1177/02692155251328945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo identify the optimal number of sessions and parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation frequency, stimulation intensity, number of pulses per session/treatment that promotes a greater effect on post-stroke upper extremity function.Data sourcesMEDLINE (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature, Scientific Electronic Library Online, and Scopus up to November 2024.Review methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with other therapies for post-stroke upper extremity function, assessed risk-of-bias using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, calculated standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and determined parameter cutoff points using a receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsThirty-five randomized clinical trials involving 897 patients were included. Compared to control groups, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with other therapies improved upper extremity motor function with a higher effect size for: ≥ 15 sessions (SMD 0.72 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.08; p < 0.0001]), > 1 Hz frequencies (0.98 [95% CI, 0.48 to 1.48; p = 0001]), intensities of <100% of resting motor threshold (SMD 0.52 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.75; p < 0.00001]), ≥ 1000 pulses per session (SMD 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.82; p < 0.00001]), and ≥12,000 pulses per treatment (SMD 0.64 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; p < 0.0001]).ConclusionTo enhance post-stroke upper extremity function, the optimal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol involves at least 15 sessions, frequencies above 1 Hz, intensities below 100% of resting motor threshold, at least 1000 pulses per session, and 12,000 pulses per treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"707-727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251328945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify the optimal number of sessions and parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation frequency, stimulation intensity, number of pulses per session/treatment that promotes a greater effect on post-stroke upper extremity function.Data sourcesMEDLINE (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature, Scientific Electronic Library Online, and Scopus up to November 2024.Review methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with other therapies for post-stroke upper extremity function, assessed risk-of-bias using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, calculated standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and determined parameter cutoff points using a receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsThirty-five randomized clinical trials involving 897 patients were included. Compared to control groups, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with other therapies improved upper extremity motor function with a higher effect size for: ≥ 15 sessions (SMD 0.72 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.08; p < 0.0001]), > 1 Hz frequencies (0.98 [95% CI, 0.48 to 1.48; p = 0001]), intensities of <100% of resting motor threshold (SMD 0.52 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.75; p < 0.00001]), ≥ 1000 pulses per session (SMD 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.82; p < 0.00001]), and ≥12,000 pulses per treatment (SMD 0.64 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.93; p < 0.0001]).ConclusionTo enhance post-stroke upper extremity function, the optimal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol involves at least 15 sessions, frequencies above 1 Hz, intensities below 100% of resting motor threshold, at least 1000 pulses per session, and 12,000 pulses per treatment.

次数和刺激参数对重复经颅磁刺激对中风后上肢恢复疗效的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的探讨经颅重复磁刺激频率、刺激强度、每次脉冲数/次对脑卒中后上肢功能改善的最佳次数和参数。数据来源medline (PubMed),护理和相关健康文献累积索引,物理治疗证据数据库,拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献,科学电子图书馆在线和Scopus截止到2024年11月。回顾方法我们对重复经颅磁刺激联合其他治疗中风后上肢功能的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,使用物理治疗证据数据库量表评估偏倚风险,计算95%置信区间(CI)的标准平均差异(SMD),并使用受试者工作特征曲线确定参数截止点。结果纳入35项随机临床试验,共897例患者。与对照组相比,重复经颅磁刺激联合其他疗法改善上肢运动功能,效果值更高:≥15个疗程(SMD 0.72 95% CI, 0.37至1.08;p 1 Hz频率(0.98 [95% CI, 0.48 ~ 1.48;P = 0001]),强度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信