Application of Deep Learning for Detection of Nasal Bone Fracture on X-Ray Nasal Bone Lateral View.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tahereh Mortezaei, Zahra Dalili Kajan, Seyed Abolghasem Mirroshandel, Mobin Mehrpour, Sara Shahidzadeh
{"title":"Application of Deep Learning for Detection of Nasal Bone Fracture on X-Ray Nasal Bone Lateral View.","authors":"Tahereh Mortezaei, Zahra Dalili Kajan, Seyed Abolghasem Mirroshandel, Mobin Mehrpour, Sara Shahidzadeh","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of deep learning applications for detection of nasal bone fracture on X-ray nasal bone lateral view.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, 2,968 X-ray nasal bone lateral views of trauma patients were collected from a radiology center, and randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets. Preprocessing included noise reduction by using the Gaussian filter and image resizing. Edge detection was performed using the Canny edge detector. Feature extraction was conducted using the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), and local binary pattern (LBP) techniques. Several machine learning algorithms namely CNN, VGG16, VGG19, MobileNet, Xception, ResNet50V2, and InceptionV3 were employed for classification of images into two classes of normal and fracture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The accuracy was the highest for VGG16 and Swin Transformer (79%) followed by ResNet50V2 and InceptionV3 (0.74), Xception (0.72) and MobileNet (0.71). The AUC was the highest for VGG16 (0.86) followed by VGG19 (0.84), MobileNet and Xception (0.83), and Swin Transformer (0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tested deep learning models were capable of detecting nasal bone fractures on X-ray nasal bone lateral views with high accuracy. VGG16 was the best model with successful results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of deep learning applications for detection of nasal bone fracture on X-ray nasal bone lateral view.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 2,968 X-ray nasal bone lateral views of trauma patients were collected from a radiology center, and randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets. Preprocessing included noise reduction by using the Gaussian filter and image resizing. Edge detection was performed using the Canny edge detector. Feature extraction was conducted using the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), and local binary pattern (LBP) techniques. Several machine learning algorithms namely CNN, VGG16, VGG19, MobileNet, Xception, ResNet50V2, and InceptionV3 were employed for classification of images into two classes of normal and fracture.

Results: The accuracy was the highest for VGG16 and Swin Transformer (79%) followed by ResNet50V2 and InceptionV3 (0.74), Xception (0.72) and MobileNet (0.71). The AUC was the highest for VGG16 (0.86) followed by VGG19 (0.84), MobileNet and Xception (0.83), and Swin Transformer (0.79).

Conclusions: The tested deep learning models were capable of detecting nasal bone fractures on X-ray nasal bone lateral views with high accuracy. VGG16 was the best model with successful results.

深度学习在鼻骨x线侧位面骨折检测中的应用。
目的:本研究旨在评估深度学习应用于鼻骨x线侧位面检测鼻骨骨折的疗效。方法:回顾性观察性研究,收集某放射学中心外伤患者鼻骨侧位x线片2968张,随机分为训练组、验证组和测试组。预处理包括高斯滤波降噪和图像大小调整。使用Canny边缘检测器进行边缘检测。采用灰度共生矩阵(GLCM)、定向梯度直方图(HOG)和局部二值模式(LBP)技术进行特征提取。采用CNN、VGG16、VGG19、MobileNet、Xception、ResNet50V2、InceptionV3等机器学习算法将图像分为正常和断裂两类。结果:VGG16和Swin Transformer的准确率最高(79%),其次是ResNet50V2和InceptionV3 (0.74), Xception(0.72)和MobileNet(0.71)。其中,VGG16的AUC最高(0.86),其次是VGG19(0.84)、MobileNet和Xception(0.83)和Swin Transformer(0.79)。结论:所测试的深度学习模型能够在x线鼻骨侧位视图上准确检测鼻骨骨折。VGG16为最佳模型,效果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信