Diagnostic errors in patients admitted directly from new outpatient visits.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-01-01 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1515/dx-2024-0088
Yu Watanabe, Taiju Miyagami, Taro Shimizu, Yuji Nishizaki, Sho Ukishima, Koichiro Santo, Seiko Furusaka Kushiro, Nozomi Aoki, Mayu Suzuki, Akio Kanazawa, Toshio Naito
{"title":"Diagnostic errors in patients admitted directly from new outpatient visits.","authors":"Yu Watanabe, Taiju Miyagami, Taro Shimizu, Yuji Nishizaki, Sho Ukishima, Koichiro Santo, Seiko Furusaka Kushiro, Nozomi Aoki, Mayu Suzuki, Akio Kanazawa, Toshio Naito","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diagnostic errors frequently represent significant adverse events that can occur in any medical setting, particularly in rushed handovers and constrained timing. Cases that result in emergency hospitalization at the time of the initial outpatient visit are more likely to have complex or serious patient conditions and more detrimental diagnostic errors. Our study investigated diagnostic errors in these under reported situations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study using electronic medical record data on patients who were directly admitted to a newly established outpatient clinic at a single university hospital in Japan. Diagnostic errors were assessed independently by two physicians using the Revised Safer Dx instrument. We analyzed patient demographics, symptoms, referrals, and resident doctor (postgraduate-year-1) involvement using logistic regression to compare groups with and without diagnostic error. Additionally, we employed the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls (GDP) to examine the factors associated with diagnostic errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 321 patients, with diagnostic errors identified in 39 cases (12.1 %). Factors contributing to diagnostic errors included the involvement of young residents, male patients, the number of symptoms, and atypical presentation. The most common causes of diagnostic errors were \"too much weight given to competing/coexisting diagnosis\" as indicated by DEER and \"atypical presentation\" by GDP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The frequency of diagnostic errors in this study was higher than those in previous studies of new outpatient visits, underscoring the imperative for heightened scrutiny in cases involving medical residents especially when patients present with multiple or atypical symptoms. This vigilance is crucial to mitigating the risk of diagnostic inaccuracies in these settings. Cases that result in emergency hospitalization at the time of the initial outpatient visit are more likely to have complex or serious patient conditions and more detrimental diagnostic errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"223-231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnostic errors frequently represent significant adverse events that can occur in any medical setting, particularly in rushed handovers and constrained timing. Cases that result in emergency hospitalization at the time of the initial outpatient visit are more likely to have complex or serious patient conditions and more detrimental diagnostic errors. Our study investigated diagnostic errors in these under reported situations.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using electronic medical record data on patients who were directly admitted to a newly established outpatient clinic at a single university hospital in Japan. Diagnostic errors were assessed independently by two physicians using the Revised Safer Dx instrument. We analyzed patient demographics, symptoms, referrals, and resident doctor (postgraduate-year-1) involvement using logistic regression to compare groups with and without diagnostic error. Additionally, we employed the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls (GDP) to examine the factors associated with diagnostic errors.

Results: The study included 321 patients, with diagnostic errors identified in 39 cases (12.1 %). Factors contributing to diagnostic errors included the involvement of young residents, male patients, the number of symptoms, and atypical presentation. The most common causes of diagnostic errors were "too much weight given to competing/coexisting diagnosis" as indicated by DEER and "atypical presentation" by GDP.

Conclusions: The frequency of diagnostic errors in this study was higher than those in previous studies of new outpatient visits, underscoring the imperative for heightened scrutiny in cases involving medical residents especially when patients present with multiple or atypical symptoms. This vigilance is crucial to mitigating the risk of diagnostic inaccuracies in these settings. Cases that result in emergency hospitalization at the time of the initial outpatient visit are more likely to have complex or serious patient conditions and more detrimental diagnostic errors.

诊断错误的患者直接入院从新的门诊就诊。
目的:诊断错误经常代表在任何医疗环境中都可能发生的重大不良事件,特别是在匆忙移交和时间有限的情况下。在初次门诊就诊时导致紧急住院的病例更可能有复杂或严重的患者病情和更有害的诊断错误。我们的研究调查了这些报告情况下的诊断错误。方法:我们使用电子病历数据对日本一家大学医院新建立的门诊直接收治的患者进行回顾性研究。诊断错误由两名医生使用经修订的Safer Dx仪器独立评估。我们分析了患者的人口统计学特征、症状、转诊和住院医生(研究生一年)的参与情况,使用逻辑回归来比较有和没有诊断错误的组。此外,我们采用诊断错误评估和研究(DEER)分类法和通用诊断缺陷(GDP)来检查与诊断错误相关的因素。结果:该研究包括321例患者,其中39例诊断错误(12.1% %)。导致诊断错误的因素包括年轻住院医师、男性患者、症状数量和非典型表现。诊断错误最常见的原因是“过度重视竞争/共存诊断”,如DEER和“非典型表现”GDP所示。结论:本研究中诊断错误的频率高于先前对新门诊就诊的研究,强调了在涉及住院医生的病例中加强审查的必要性,特别是当患者出现多种或非典型症状时。这种警惕对于减轻这些情况下诊断不准确的风险至关重要。在初次门诊就诊时导致紧急住院的病例更可能有复杂或严重的患者病情和更有害的诊断错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diagnosis
Diagnosis MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality.  Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信