Disparities in heart transplant survival and graft rejection outcomes persist in the modern era: a call to race towards a more equitable future.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ahad Firoz, Daniel Remer, Huaqing Zhao, Xiaoning Lu, Eman Hamad
{"title":"Disparities in heart transplant survival and graft rejection outcomes persist in the modern era: a call to race towards a more equitable future.","authors":"Ahad Firoz, Daniel Remer, Huaqing Zhao, Xiaoning Lu, Eman Hamad","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities remain an ongoing challenge in healthcare. Such inequities have been reported in heart transplantation (HTx); however, there is limited data within the modern era. Additionally, there is scarce information on outcomes besides death, such as graft rejection. Therefore, our investigation aims to add further data on contemporary racial and ethnic disparities on post-transplant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult isolated HTx recipients who were transplanted between 1/2000 and 9/2023 were analysed using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Inclusion criteria included 'White', 'Black', 'Hispanic' and 'Asian' recipients. Two primary outcomes of interest were analysed: mortality and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Survival was assessed using a cause-specific model, whereas CAV analysis utilized a competing-risk approach. Subgroup survival analysis was conducted for patients listed in the years prior to (11/2013-10/2018) and after (10/2018-9/2023) the 2018 heart allocation policy (HAP) changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 243 patients were included in our analysis. Black recipients were the only group found to have an increased overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30, P < 0.001) and post-HAP (HR = 1.36, P < 0.001) mortality risk. Asian (HR = 1.19, P= 0.001) and Hispanic (HR = 1.15, P < 0.001) recipients had elevated risks of CAV, whereas Black patients had similar risk (HR = 1.00, P = 0.864) as White recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our investigation suggests that disparities continue to exist for minority groups after HTx. Notably, the 2018 allocation changes may have introduced or exacerbated such inequities for Black recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"67 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Racial and ethnic disparities remain an ongoing challenge in healthcare. Such inequities have been reported in heart transplantation (HTx); however, there is limited data within the modern era. Additionally, there is scarce information on outcomes besides death, such as graft rejection. Therefore, our investigation aims to add further data on contemporary racial and ethnic disparities on post-transplant outcomes.

Methods: Adult isolated HTx recipients who were transplanted between 1/2000 and 9/2023 were analysed using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Inclusion criteria included 'White', 'Black', 'Hispanic' and 'Asian' recipients. Two primary outcomes of interest were analysed: mortality and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Survival was assessed using a cause-specific model, whereas CAV analysis utilized a competing-risk approach. Subgroup survival analysis was conducted for patients listed in the years prior to (11/2013-10/2018) and after (10/2018-9/2023) the 2018 heart allocation policy (HAP) changes.

Results: A total of 50 243 patients were included in our analysis. Black recipients were the only group found to have an increased overall (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.30, P < 0.001) and post-HAP (HR = 1.36, P < 0.001) mortality risk. Asian (HR = 1.19, P= 0.001) and Hispanic (HR = 1.15, P < 0.001) recipients had elevated risks of CAV, whereas Black patients had similar risk (HR = 1.00, P = 0.864) as White recipients.

Conclusions: Our investigation suggests that disparities continue to exist for minority groups after HTx. Notably, the 2018 allocation changes may have introduced or exacerbated such inequities for Black recipients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心脏移植生存和移植排斥结果的差异在现代仍然存在:呼吁向更公平的未来赛跑。
目标:种族和民族差异仍然是医疗保健领域的一个持续挑战。这种不公平现象在心脏移植(HTx)中已有报道;然而,在现代,数据有限。此外,除了死亡之外,关于移植排斥反应等结果的信息很少。因此,我们的研究旨在进一步增加当代移植后结果的种族和民族差异的数据。方法:使用美国器官共享网络(UNOS)数据库对2000年1月至2023年9月间移植的成人离体HTx受者进行分析。入选标准包括“白人”、“黑人”、“西班牙裔”和“亚洲人”。分析了两个主要结局:死亡率和心脏移植血管病变(CAV)。生存评估采用病因特异性模型,而CAV分析采用竞争风险方法。对2018年心脏分配政策(HAP)改变前(2013年11月- 2018年10月)和之后(2018年10月- 2023年9月)的患者进行亚组生存分析。结果:共有50243例患者纳入我们的分析。黑人接受者是唯一发现整体增加的群体(风险比[HR] = 1.30, P)。结论:我们的调查表明,HTx后少数群体的差异继续存在。值得注意的是,2018年的分配变化可能已经引入或加剧了黑人受助人的这种不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
564
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信