Amir Qaseem, Peter Basch, Karen Campos, Scott T MacDonald, Cristin A Mount, Samantha Tierney, Rebecca A Andrews, Nick Fitterman, Elisa I Choi, Roger S Khetan, Nancy L Miller, Nicole J Van Groningen, Brook Watts
{"title":"Quality Indicators for Diabetes in Adults: A Review of Performance Measures by the American College of Physicians.","authors":"Amir Qaseem, Peter Basch, Karen Campos, Scott T MacDonald, Cristin A Mount, Samantha Tierney, Rebecca A Andrews, Nick Fitterman, Elisa I Choi, Roger S Khetan, Nancy L Miller, Nicole J Van Groningen, Brook Watts","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-03770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Type 1 and type 2 diabetes are prevalent chronic illnesses, are leading causes of mortality and morbidity, and result in substantial public health burden. Timely identification and appropriate management of diabetes can help reduce adverse consequences of diabetes. The American College of Physicians (ACP) embraces performance measurement as a means to improve quality of care but believes that a performance measure must be methodologically sound and evidence-based in order to be considered for inclusion in payment, accountability, or reporting programs. These principles are critical given the potential impact on physician administrative work, reputation, and reimbursement and to prevent unintended consequences for patient care. To help improve performance measurement and reduce burden, the ACP Performance Measurement Committee (PMC) reviews performance measures using a rigorous process to recognize high-quality measures and address gaps and areas for improvement. In this article, the PMC presents its review of 14 current performance measures for diabetes that are relevant to internal medicine. The PMC supports kidney health evaluation at the individual and group practice levels, hemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> control at the health plan level, eye examination at the health plan level, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker therapy at the individual physician level.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1012-1020"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03770","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Type 1 and type 2 diabetes are prevalent chronic illnesses, are leading causes of mortality and morbidity, and result in substantial public health burden. Timely identification and appropriate management of diabetes can help reduce adverse consequences of diabetes. The American College of Physicians (ACP) embraces performance measurement as a means to improve quality of care but believes that a performance measure must be methodologically sound and evidence-based in order to be considered for inclusion in payment, accountability, or reporting programs. These principles are critical given the potential impact on physician administrative work, reputation, and reimbursement and to prevent unintended consequences for patient care. To help improve performance measurement and reduce burden, the ACP Performance Measurement Committee (PMC) reviews performance measures using a rigorous process to recognize high-quality measures and address gaps and areas for improvement. In this article, the PMC presents its review of 14 current performance measures for diabetes that are relevant to internal medicine. The PMC supports kidney health evaluation at the individual and group practice levels, hemoglobin A1c control at the health plan level, eye examination at the health plan level, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker therapy at the individual physician level.
1型和2型糖尿病是流行的慢性疾病,是导致死亡和发病的主要原因,并造成巨大的公共卫生负担。及时发现和适当管理糖尿病有助于减少糖尿病的不良后果。美国医师学会(American College of Physicians, ACP)将绩效评估作为提高医疗质量的一种手段,但认为绩效评估必须在方法上合理,并以证据为基础,才能考虑纳入支付、问责或报告计划。考虑到对医生管理工作、声誉和报销的潜在影响,以及防止对患者护理的意外后果,这些原则至关重要。为了帮助改进绩效评估和减轻负担,ACP绩效评估委员会(PMC)使用严格的程序审查绩效评估,以识别高质量的评估,并解决差距和需要改进的领域。在这篇文章中,PMC提出了14个目前与内科相关的糖尿病绩效指标的综述。PMC支持个人和团体实践水平的肾脏健康评估,健康计划水平的血红蛋白A1c控制,健康计划水平的眼科检查,以及个体医生水平的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻断剂治疗。
期刊介绍:
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.