Investigating clinical indicators for neuroimaging abnormalities in acute headache cases: insights from a retrospective study.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Felipe Mejía-Herrera, Roger Figueroa-Paz, Jaime Quintero-Ramirez, Luis Alfonso Bustamante-Cristancho
{"title":"Investigating clinical indicators for neuroimaging abnormalities in acute headache cases: insights from a retrospective study.","authors":"Felipe Mejía-Herrera, Roger Figueroa-Paz, Jaime Quintero-Ramirez, Luis Alfonso Bustamante-Cristancho","doi":"10.1007/s10140-025-02347-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Headache is common at emergency services and neuroimaging can help in timely diagnosis of life-threatening pathologies. We evaluated clinical indicators associated with abnormal neuroimaging in patients with acute headache, aiming to develop a scoring system with reliable diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analytical and retrospective study was conducted at a teaching tertiary care hospital in Cali, Colombia, from January 2011 to December 2019. Patients aged 18 years or older with non-traumatic headaches who attended the emergency department and underwent neuroimaging were included. Demographic and clinical data were recorded, including headache associated signs and symptoms, imaging diagnosis and disposition. Statistically significant variables and clinically relevant variables were selected. Data was analyzed using a combination of logistic regression and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves, leading to the derivation of three models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>626 patients were included, 15.5% with abnormal neuroimaging. The variables with the highest odds ratio (OR) were: age > 40 years (OR 3.2 CI 1.86-5.56), motor deficit (OR 5.4 CI 2.62-11.18), visual deficit (OR 3.2 CI 1.56-6.63) and gait disturbance (OR 2.27 CI 0.87-5.96). Three abnormal neuroimaging prediction logistic regression models have been derived. The better scale is performed with model 1, which is validated internally and a cut-off point of 0.179, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.757 is obtained with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.79 (0.73-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our straightforward scale incorporates clinical factors associated with abnormal neuroimaging, with the aim of improving diagnostic performance and predictive capacity to distinguish patients who require neuroimaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":11623,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-025-02347-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Headache is common at emergency services and neuroimaging can help in timely diagnosis of life-threatening pathologies. We evaluated clinical indicators associated with abnormal neuroimaging in patients with acute headache, aiming to develop a scoring system with reliable diagnostic performance.

Methods: This analytical and retrospective study was conducted at a teaching tertiary care hospital in Cali, Colombia, from January 2011 to December 2019. Patients aged 18 years or older with non-traumatic headaches who attended the emergency department and underwent neuroimaging were included. Demographic and clinical data were recorded, including headache associated signs and symptoms, imaging diagnosis and disposition. Statistically significant variables and clinically relevant variables were selected. Data was analyzed using a combination of logistic regression and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves, leading to the derivation of three models.

Results: 626 patients were included, 15.5% with abnormal neuroimaging. The variables with the highest odds ratio (OR) were: age > 40 years (OR 3.2 CI 1.86-5.56), motor deficit (OR 5.4 CI 2.62-11.18), visual deficit (OR 3.2 CI 1.56-6.63) and gait disturbance (OR 2.27 CI 0.87-5.96). Three abnormal neuroimaging prediction logistic regression models have been derived. The better scale is performed with model 1, which is validated internally and a cut-off point of 0.179, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.757 is obtained with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.79 (0.73-0.85).

Conclusion: Our straightforward scale incorporates clinical factors associated with abnormal neuroimaging, with the aim of improving diagnostic performance and predictive capacity to distinguish patients who require neuroimaging.

研究急性头痛病例神经影像学异常的临床指标:来自回顾性研究的见解。
目的:头痛是常见的急诊服务和神经影像学可以帮助及时诊断危及生命的病理。我们评估了与急性头痛患者异常神经影像学相关的临床指标,旨在建立一个具有可靠诊断性能的评分系统。方法:本研究于2011年1月至2019年12月在哥伦比亚卡利的一家三级教学医院进行分析和回顾性研究。年龄在18岁或以上的非创伤性头痛患者就诊于急诊科并接受了神经影像学检查。记录了人口统计学和临床数据,包括头痛相关的体征和症状、影像学诊断和处置。选取具有统计学意义的变量和临床相关的变量。数据分析采用逻辑回归和接收算子特征(ROC)曲线相结合,导致三个模型的推导。结果:纳入626例患者,神经影像学异常占15.5%。比值比(OR)最高的变量为:年龄0 ~ 40岁(OR 3.2 CI 1.86 ~ 5.56)、运动缺陷(OR 5.4 CI 2.62 ~ 11.18)、视力缺陷(OR 3.2 CI 1.56 ~ 6.63)和步态障碍(OR 2.27 CI 0.87 ~ 5.96)。推导了三种异常神经影像学预测逻辑回归模型。模型1进行了内部验证,截断点为0.179,得到的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.757,诊断精度为0.79(0.73-0.85)。结论:我们的简易量表纳入了与神经影像学异常相关的临床因素,旨在提高诊断性能和预测能力,以区分需要神经影像学检查的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Radiology
Emergency Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: To advance and improve the radiologic aspects of emergency careTo establish Emergency Radiology as an area of special interest in the field of diagnostic imagingTo improve methods of education in Emergency RadiologyTo provide, through formal meetings, a mechanism for presentation of scientific papers on various aspects of Emergency Radiology and continuing educationTo promote research in Emergency Radiology by clinical and basic science investigators, including residents and other traineesTo act as the resource body on Emergency Radiology for those interested in emergency patient care Members of the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) receive the Emergency Radiology journal as a benefit of membership!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信