Evaluating the diagnostic significance of the R2* value on 3.0T MRI for assessing the severity of warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shichao Xu, Qian Ji, Jing Xu
{"title":"Evaluating the diagnostic significance of the R2* value on 3.0T MRI for assessing the severity of warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.","authors":"Shichao Xu, Qian Ji, Jing Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-03947-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be a non-invasive tool for managing warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (WHIRI).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the R2* values derived from 3.0T blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI in assessing the severity of WHIRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty healthy adult New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 5 groups with 10 rabbits in each. The experimental groups (40 rabbits) underwent clamping of the hepatic artery and the portal vein for 10, 20, 30, or 40 min, followed by 6 h of reperfusion to induce WHIRI. The other 10 rabbits comprised the normal control group. All animals were underwent conventional 3.0 T and BOLD MRI. Animals were euthanized and the serum levels of biochemical indicators were determined. Correlations between R2* values, biochemical indicators, and WHIRI staging were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The diagnostic efficacy of R2* values was evaluated using ROC curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>R2* values increased gradually with prolonged warm ischemia with significant differences across groups (F = 133.25, P < 0.05). A strong positive correlation was detected between R2* values and WHIRI staging (r = 0.878, P = 0.000). Biochemical indicators (ALT, AST, LDH, MDA, and MPO) increased significantly, while SOD levels decreased with prolonged warm ischemia (P < 0.05). R2* values exhibited a strong positive correlation with biochemical indicators (r > 0.495) and a negative correlation with SOD levels (r=-0.658). The diagnostic efficacy of the R2* values was highest for predicting WHIRI above stage S4 (AUC = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>R2* values on BOLD MRI provide a sensitive and accurate method for assessing WHIRI. The diagnostic efficacy of the R2* values was the best for predicting WHIRI above stage S4.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03947-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be a non-invasive tool for managing warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (WHIRI).

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the R2* values derived from 3.0T blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI in assessing the severity of WHIRI.

Methods: Fifty healthy adult New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 5 groups with 10 rabbits in each. The experimental groups (40 rabbits) underwent clamping of the hepatic artery and the portal vein for 10, 20, 30, or 40 min, followed by 6 h of reperfusion to induce WHIRI. The other 10 rabbits comprised the normal control group. All animals were underwent conventional 3.0 T and BOLD MRI. Animals were euthanized and the serum levels of biochemical indicators were determined. Correlations between R2* values, biochemical indicators, and WHIRI staging were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The diagnostic efficacy of R2* values was evaluated using ROC curves.

Results: R2* values increased gradually with prolonged warm ischemia with significant differences across groups (F = 133.25, P < 0.05). A strong positive correlation was detected between R2* values and WHIRI staging (r = 0.878, P = 0.000). Biochemical indicators (ALT, AST, LDH, MDA, and MPO) increased significantly, while SOD levels decreased with prolonged warm ischemia (P < 0.05). R2* values exhibited a strong positive correlation with biochemical indicators (r > 0.495) and a negative correlation with SOD levels (r=-0.658). The diagnostic efficacy of the R2* values was highest for predicting WHIRI above stage S4 (AUC = 1.000).

Conclusion: R2* values on BOLD MRI provide a sensitive and accurate method for assessing WHIRI. The diagnostic efficacy of the R2* values was the best for predicting WHIRI above stage S4.

评价3.0T MRI R2*值对评估热性肝缺血再灌注损伤严重程度的诊断意义。
背景:磁共振成像(MRI)可能是治疗热肝缺血再灌注损伤(WHIRI)的一种无创工具。目的:我们旨在评估3.0T血氧水平依赖(BOLD) MRI得出的R2*值在评估WHIRI严重程度中的诊断效用。方法:50只健康成年新西兰大白兔随机分为5组,每组10只。实验组(40只)分别夹持肝动脉和门静脉10、20、30、40 min,再灌注6 h诱导WHIRI。其余10只为正常对照组。所有动物均行常规3.0 T和BOLD MRI检查。对动物实施安乐死,测定血清生化指标。采用Spearman秩相关系数评估R2*值、生化指标与WHIRI分期之间的相关性。采用ROC曲线评价R2*值的诊断效能。结果:随着热缺血时间的延长,R2*值逐渐升高,组间差异有统计学意义(F = 133.25, P 0.495),与SOD水平呈负相关(r=-0.658)。预测S4期以上患者WHIRI的诊断效能R2*值最高(AUC = 1.000)。结论:BOLD MRI R2*值为评价WHIRI提供了灵敏、准确的方法。R2*值对S4期以上患者的诊断效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信