The impact of the Kermanshah earthquake experiences of Iranian nurses as rescuers: a qualitative study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Amirhossein Naghibzadeh, Keivan Moradi, Hamid Saidi, Jalal Karimi, Khalil Moradi
{"title":"The impact of the Kermanshah earthquake experiences of Iranian nurses as rescuers: a qualitative study.","authors":"Amirhossein Naghibzadeh, Keivan Moradi, Hamid Saidi, Jalal Karimi, Khalil Moradi","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01227-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past few years, Iran has experienced several earthquakes. The literature has highlighted the significant role played by Iranian nurses in the Kermanshah earthquake. However, few studies have been conducted to investigate nurses' responses to disasters. This study aimed to explore the impacts of rescue experiences on nurses who cared for the injured following the Kermanshah earthquake.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a qualitative study utilizing a conventional content analysis approach, following the Granheim and Landman framework. Sixteen nurses with experience in caring for earthquake survivors in Kermanshah were selected using a purposeful sampling method. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews, with ethical considerations applied at all stages of the research. MAXQDA software (version 10) was employed to assist in managing the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 16 nurses: nine females (56.25%) and seven males (43.75%). The mean age of the participants was 34.13 ± 5.78 years, and the mean work experience was 10.75 ± 5.3 years. Following the coding of the interviews, 274 initial codes were extracted. These codes were merged to form 17 subcategories, five categories, and two main themes. The main themes were (i) Positive impacts (professional maturity, and the emergence of a new horizon in the meaning of life) and (ii) Negative impacts (psychological trauma, a decline in professional performance, and spiritual despair).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of this type of care, nurses experience dual impacts: on one hand, it uplifts their personal lives and professional performance, while on the other hand, it poses significant threats to them.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01227-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the past few years, Iran has experienced several earthquakes. The literature has highlighted the significant role played by Iranian nurses in the Kermanshah earthquake. However, few studies have been conducted to investigate nurses' responses to disasters. This study aimed to explore the impacts of rescue experiences on nurses who cared for the injured following the Kermanshah earthquake.

Method: This is a qualitative study utilizing a conventional content analysis approach, following the Granheim and Landman framework. Sixteen nurses with experience in caring for earthquake survivors in Kermanshah were selected using a purposeful sampling method. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews, with ethical considerations applied at all stages of the research. MAXQDA software (version 10) was employed to assist in managing the data.

Results: The study included 16 nurses: nine females (56.25%) and seven males (43.75%). The mean age of the participants was 34.13 ± 5.78 years, and the mean work experience was 10.75 ± 5.3 years. Following the coding of the interviews, 274 initial codes were extracted. These codes were merged to form 17 subcategories, five categories, and two main themes. The main themes were (i) Positive impacts (professional maturity, and the emergence of a new horizon in the meaning of life) and (ii) Negative impacts (psychological trauma, a decline in professional performance, and spiritual despair).

Conclusion: In the context of this type of care, nurses experience dual impacts: on one hand, it uplifts their personal lives and professional performance, while on the other hand, it poses significant threats to them.

克尔曼沙地震经验对伊朗护士作为救援人员的影响:一项定性研究。
背景:在过去的几年里,伊朗经历了几次地震。文献强调了伊朗护士在克尔曼沙地震中发挥的重要作用。然而,很少有研究调查护士对灾害的反应。本研究旨在探讨克尔曼沙地震后救援经验对护理伤者护士的影响。方法:这是一项定性研究,利用传统的内容分析方法,遵循格兰海姆和兰德曼框架。采用有目的的抽样方法,选择了16名具有护理克尔曼沙地震幸存者经验的护士。数据是通过深入的半结构化访谈收集的,在研究的各个阶段都应用了伦理考虑。使用MAXQDA软件(版本10)协助管理数据。结果:共纳入16名护士,其中女性9名(56.25%),男性7名(43.75%)。参与者平均年龄为34.13±5.78岁,平均工作经验为10.75±5.3岁。对访谈进行编码后,提取了274个初始编码。这些代码被合并成17个子类别,5个类别和2个主题。主题是:(i)积极影响(专业成熟,生活意义的新视野的出现)和(ii)消极影响(心理创伤,专业表现下降,精神绝望)。结论:在这种护理环境下,护士经历了双重影响:一方面提升了他们的个人生活和专业表现,另一方面对他们构成了重大威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信