The Future of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Realistic Model for Trainee Certification.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Camryn Payne, Casey Martinez, Nicole Van Spronsen, Max Shrout, W Nicholas Jungbauer, Bryn E Morris, William Casey, Daniel Rhee, Edward Reece, Johnny Yi, Alanna Rebecca
{"title":"The Future of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Realistic Model for Trainee Certification.","authors":"Camryn Payne, Casey Martinez, Nicole Van Spronsen, Max Shrout, W Nicholas Jungbauer, Bryn E Morris, William Casey, Daniel Rhee, Edward Reece, Johnny Yi, Alanna Rebecca","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Robots have been used effectively in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) for reconstruction. The utilization of robotics in all surgical specialties is expanding with the goal of offering the most appropriate patient-centered care possible, especially in complex multidisciplinary cases. Despite the safety, efficiency, and reproducibility of robotics in PRS, there is a paucity of required and formalized training in PRS residency programs. The ACGME and industry published guidelines were investigated. Robotic surgery case logs of Mayo Clinic Arizona General Surgery residents were analyzed with attention to equivalency certification (EQ). Over the past 5 years, the equivalency certification from Intuitive (Sunnyvale, CA) was obtained by 30% of all general surgery residents at our institution (range, 0-100). The case numbers to obtain the equivalence certification are industry recommendations, and proficiency is determined by the program director. The ACGME does not mandate robotics training in general surgery residency. According to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), trainees must complete 20 console cases and 10 bedside cases to become industry certified. With respect to training and advancing the field, PRS residents could successfully obtain certification in their residency programs. The minimum case requirement recommended by SAGES is not burdensome and can ensure robotic privileges in PRS practice immediately following graduation. By improving the training for minimally invasive robotic surgery in plastic surgery, patients and healthcare systems benefit from improved quality of life outcomes and decreased postoperative length of stay, which results in less strain on our entire medical system.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 5S Suppl 3","pages":"S421-S424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Robots have been used effectively in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) for reconstruction. The utilization of robotics in all surgical specialties is expanding with the goal of offering the most appropriate patient-centered care possible, especially in complex multidisciplinary cases. Despite the safety, efficiency, and reproducibility of robotics in PRS, there is a paucity of required and formalized training in PRS residency programs. The ACGME and industry published guidelines were investigated. Robotic surgery case logs of Mayo Clinic Arizona General Surgery residents were analyzed with attention to equivalency certification (EQ). Over the past 5 years, the equivalency certification from Intuitive (Sunnyvale, CA) was obtained by 30% of all general surgery residents at our institution (range, 0-100). The case numbers to obtain the equivalence certification are industry recommendations, and proficiency is determined by the program director. The ACGME does not mandate robotics training in general surgery residency. According to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), trainees must complete 20 console cases and 10 bedside cases to become industry certified. With respect to training and advancing the field, PRS residents could successfully obtain certification in their residency programs. The minimum case requirement recommended by SAGES is not burdensome and can ensure robotic privileges in PRS practice immediately following graduation. By improving the training for minimally invasive robotic surgery in plastic surgery, patients and healthcare systems benefit from improved quality of life outcomes and decreased postoperative length of stay, which results in less strain on our entire medical system.

机器人在整形和重建手术中的未来:实习生认证的现实模型。
摘要:机器人在整形和重建手术(PRS)中得到了有效的应用。机器人技术在所有外科专业的应用正在扩大,其目标是提供最适当的以患者为中心的护理,特别是在复杂的多学科病例中。尽管机器人技术在PRS中具有安全性、效率和可重复性,但在PRS住院医师计划中缺乏必要的和正式的培训。对ACGME和行业发布的指南进行了调查。对亚利桑那州梅奥诊所普外科住院医师的机器人手术病例日志进行分析,并关注等效认证(EQ)。在过去的5年中,我们机构30%的普通外科住院医师获得了Intuitive (Sunnyvale, CA)的等效认证(范围0-100)。获得等效认证的案例编号是行业建议,熟练程度由项目主管确定。ACGME并没有要求普通外科住院医师接受机器人培训。根据美国胃肠和内窥镜外科医生协会(SAGES)的规定,学员必须完成20个控制台病例和10个床边病例才能获得行业认证。在培训和推进该领域方面,PRS住院医师可以在他们的住院医师计划中成功获得认证。SAGES推荐的最低案例要求并不繁重,并且可以确保机器人在毕业后立即在PRS实践中享有特权。通过改进整形外科中微创机器人手术的培训,患者和医疗保健系统受益于改善的生活质量和缩短的术后住院时间,从而减少我们整个医疗系统的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信