Quality improvement project to reduce beta-D-glucan turnaround times in an NHS pathology network.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Madeline Stone, Cassie Pope, Nathan Proudlove
{"title":"Quality improvement project to reduce beta-D-glucan turnaround times in an NHS pathology network.","authors":"Madeline Stone, Cassie Pope, Nathan Proudlove","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Beta-D-glucan (BDG) is a cell wall component of many fungi, detecting this in patients' serum permits early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections, particularly in patients with haematological malignancy. In critically ill patients in an intensive-care unit, where the prevalence of invasive fungal infection is lower, the high negative predictive value of BDG facilitates withholding or discontinuation of empirical antifungal therapy, contributing to antifungal stewardship. However, for the results of BDG testing to impact patient management, they need to be available within a clinically useful timeframe.The South West London Pathology (SWLP) network routinely sent samples for BDG testing from hospital trusts in our area to the UK Health Security Agency Mycology Reference Laboratory (MRL) at Bristol for analysis. In 2021, the mean turnaround time (TAT) was more than two times the 5-working-days standard stated in the SWLP user handbook. In this quality improvement project (QIP), we identified that the greatest delay was the MRL posting hardcopy reports. We investigated electronic reporting, first for all patient samples, and then only for intensive-care patients. However, we found that information technology (IT) and staffing limitations meant this was not viable.We then investigated commercial solutions and identified an innovative assay, which enabled the implementation of in-house BDG testing that was a good fit with our available staffing resource and laboratory environment. Our aim was to achieve at least 90% of BDG results authorised within 5 working days of sample receipt. Our QIP improved performance on this from 0.88% to 92.8% and reduced the mean TAT from 11.6 to 2.5 days and at lower unit cost. The change has been well received by our laboratory staff, and our pathology operational leads have had very positive feedback from our clinical teams and our antifungal steward.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beta-D-glucan (BDG) is a cell wall component of many fungi, detecting this in patients' serum permits early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections, particularly in patients with haematological malignancy. In critically ill patients in an intensive-care unit, where the prevalence of invasive fungal infection is lower, the high negative predictive value of BDG facilitates withholding or discontinuation of empirical antifungal therapy, contributing to antifungal stewardship. However, for the results of BDG testing to impact patient management, they need to be available within a clinically useful timeframe.The South West London Pathology (SWLP) network routinely sent samples for BDG testing from hospital trusts in our area to the UK Health Security Agency Mycology Reference Laboratory (MRL) at Bristol for analysis. In 2021, the mean turnaround time (TAT) was more than two times the 5-working-days standard stated in the SWLP user handbook. In this quality improvement project (QIP), we identified that the greatest delay was the MRL posting hardcopy reports. We investigated electronic reporting, first for all patient samples, and then only for intensive-care patients. However, we found that information technology (IT) and staffing limitations meant this was not viable.We then investigated commercial solutions and identified an innovative assay, which enabled the implementation of in-house BDG testing that was a good fit with our available staffing resource and laboratory environment. Our aim was to achieve at least 90% of BDG results authorised within 5 working days of sample receipt. Our QIP improved performance on this from 0.88% to 92.8% and reduced the mean TAT from 11.6 to 2.5 days and at lower unit cost. The change has been well received by our laboratory staff, and our pathology operational leads have had very positive feedback from our clinical teams and our antifungal steward.

质量改进项目,以减少β - d -葡聚糖周转时间在NHS病理网络。
β - d -葡聚糖(BDG)是许多真菌的细胞壁成分,在患者血清中检测它可以早期诊断侵袭性真菌感染,特别是在血液恶性肿瘤患者中。在重症监护病房的危重患者中,侵袭性真菌感染的患病率较低,BDG的高阴性预测值有助于推迟或停止经验性抗真菌治疗,有助于抗真菌管理。然而,为了使BDG检测结果影响患者管理,它们需要在临床有用的时间范围内提供。西南伦敦病理学(SWLP)网络定期将我们地区医院信托的BDG检测样本送到布里斯托尔的英国卫生安全局真菌学参考实验室(MRL)进行分析。2021年,平均周转时间(TAT)是SWLP用户手册中规定的5个工作日标准的两倍多。在这个质量改进项目(QIP)中,我们确定最大的延迟是MRL发布硬拷贝报告。我们调查了电子报告,首先针对所有患者样本,然后仅针对重症监护患者。然而,我们发现信息技术(IT)和人员配备的限制意味着这是不可行的。然后,我们研究了商业解决方案,并确定了一种创新的分析方法,该方法可以实现内部BDG测试,这与我们现有的人员资源和实验室环境非常适合。我们的目标是在收到样品后的5个工作日内实现至少90%的BDG授权结果。我们的QIP将这方面的性能从0.88%提高到92.8%,并以更低的单位成本将平均TAT从11.6天降低到2.5天。我们的实验室人员对这一变化非常满意,我们的病理操作主管也从我们的临床团队和抗真菌管理员那里得到了非常积极的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信