{"title":"\"How long until I am seen, doc?\" Modelling paediatric emergency department waiting times to make personalised predictions.","authors":"Sarah Rahayu Hogben, Robin Marlow","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2023-213718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ED patient wait times have been progressively increasing leading to patient dissatisfaction in ED. Managing patient expectations towards wait times in ED may be more effective at decreasing dissatisfaction than shortening actual wait times. Models for predicting wait times have been made for general EDs but not for solely paediatric departments. We aimed to create a model that could predict the personalised wait time of a child presenting to paediatric ED after triage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre retrospective study analysing all ED attendances to the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022. From anonymised routinely collected administrative data, we created a multiple linear regression model to predict wait times. We developed the model by randomly assigning 80% of the data to a training set and used the remaining 20% as a validation set to assess the accuracy of our model. CIs were calculated using 500 bootstrap iterations sampled from the validation set. Understanding that patients are satisfied being seen sooner than their predicted wait time, we considered the result to be unsuccessful if their actual wait time was 30 min over their predicted wait time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 40 828 ED presentations, the median patient wait time was 65 min (IQR 34-122). Our model was able to predict wait times for 84.2% (95% CI 83.42% to 84.91%) of attendances successfully. Triage category, number of patients waiting, number of patients in the department, time of presentation, length of wait of last patient and day of week all had a significant impact on prediction of wait times (all p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tailored models created using routine data can be used to give individualised predictions for wait times in paediatric ED, which could be given to patients with the aim of managing expectations and improving patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2023-213718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: ED patient wait times have been progressively increasing leading to patient dissatisfaction in ED. Managing patient expectations towards wait times in ED may be more effective at decreasing dissatisfaction than shortening actual wait times. Models for predicting wait times have been made for general EDs but not for solely paediatric departments. We aimed to create a model that could predict the personalised wait time of a child presenting to paediatric ED after triage.
Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study analysing all ED attendances to the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022. From anonymised routinely collected administrative data, we created a multiple linear regression model to predict wait times. We developed the model by randomly assigning 80% of the data to a training set and used the remaining 20% as a validation set to assess the accuracy of our model. CIs were calculated using 500 bootstrap iterations sampled from the validation set. Understanding that patients are satisfied being seen sooner than their predicted wait time, we considered the result to be unsuccessful if their actual wait time was 30 min over their predicted wait time.
Results: From 40 828 ED presentations, the median patient wait time was 65 min (IQR 34-122). Our model was able to predict wait times for 84.2% (95% CI 83.42% to 84.91%) of attendances successfully. Triage category, number of patients waiting, number of patients in the department, time of presentation, length of wait of last patient and day of week all had a significant impact on prediction of wait times (all p<0.001).
Conclusion: Tailored models created using routine data can be used to give individualised predictions for wait times in paediatric ED, which could be given to patients with the aim of managing expectations and improving patient satisfaction.
背景:急诊科患者等待时间逐渐增加,导致患者对急诊科的不满。管理患者对急诊科等待时间的期望可能比缩短实际等待时间更有效地减少患者的不满。预测等待时间的模型已经用于普通急诊科,但并不仅限于儿科。我们的目标是创建一个模型,可以预测一个孩子在分诊后到儿科急诊科就诊的个性化等待时间。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,分析了2022年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间布里斯托尔皇家儿童医院的所有急诊科就诊情况。根据匿名的常规收集的管理数据,我们创建了一个多元线性回归模型来预测等待时间。我们通过将80%的数据随机分配给训练集来开发模型,并使用剩余的20%作为验证集来评估我们模型的准确性。使用从验证集中采样的500次bootstrap迭代来计算ci。了解到患者满意于比预期等待时间更早看到,如果他们的实际等待时间比预期等待时间多30分钟,我们认为结果是不成功的。结果:在40828例ED病例中,患者等待时间中位数为65分钟(IQR 34-122)。我们的模型能够成功预测84.2% (95% CI 83.42%至84.91%)的出席者的等待时间。分诊类别、候诊患者数量、住院患者数量、就诊时间、最后一位患者的候诊时间和一周中的哪一天都对候诊时间的预测有显著影响。结论:使用常规数据创建的定制模型可用于对儿科急诊科候诊时间进行个性化预测,可用于管理患者期望并提高患者满意度。
期刊介绍:
The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.