Medicaid Costs and Outcomes for Patients Treated in an Outpatient Telepsychiatry Clinic.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
John L Havlik, Reza H Ghomi, Na An, Puneet Budhiraja, Eric R Arzubi
{"title":"Medicaid Costs and Outcomes for Patients Treated in an Outpatient Telepsychiatry Clinic.","authors":"John L Havlik, Reza H Ghomi, Na An, Puneet Budhiraja, Eric R Arzubi","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Evidence of cost savings attributable to indicated and timely care remain rare in psychiatry. Interventions to provide evidence-based psychiatric care to Medicaid patients that lower total costs of care are particularly challenging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate Medicaid costs and care outcomes associated with use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed Medicaid patients using and not using the services of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic (Frontier Psychiatry, Billings, Montana) in 2022. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Receipt of care through an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Differences in Medicaid costs and cost subtypes between telepsychiatry patients and controls were assessed. Quality metrics, including inpatient hospitalizations, hospital readmissions, and admissions from the emergency department, were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, there were 2686 patients using the outpatient telepsychiatry clinic's services (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 30.55 [14.67] years) and 2686 propensity-matched controls (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 31.37 [15.92] years). Across categories examined, the telepsychiatry patients had care costs per member per month (PMPM) similar to those for propensity-matched control patients ($685.5 [95% CI, $632.9-$738.2] vs $734.0 [95% CI, $645.7-$822.3]; P = .10) over the study period. PMPM costs to Medicaid from the telepsychiatry clinic's patients were higher for professional services vs control patients ($464.0 [95% CI, $443.4-$484.5] vs $388.4 [95% CI, $368.1-$408.7]; P < .001) but were lower for inpatient hospitalization fees ($201.6 [95% CI, $146.2-$228.7] vs $260.6 [95% CI, $220.2-$341.5]; P = .04). Telepsychiatry clinic patients had a 38.0% lower mean annualized hospitalization rate per 1000 patients than controls (274.3 [95% CI, 237.1-311.6] hospitalizations per 1000 patients vs 442.6 [95% CI, 396.5-488.7] hospitalizations per 1000 patients; P < .001) and a 17.9% lower rate of admissions from the emergency department (patients vs controls, 299.7 admissions [47.7%] vs 519.0 admissions [58.1%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study of 5372 patients, use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic's services was associated with decreases in inpatient hospitalization rates and lower rates of admissions from the emergency department, with similar costs to Medicaid. These findings suggest that outpatient telepsychiatry care could play an important role in reducing hospital admissions among patients enrolled in Medicaid.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 5","pages":"e258558"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.8558","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Evidence of cost savings attributable to indicated and timely care remain rare in psychiatry. Interventions to provide evidence-based psychiatric care to Medicaid patients that lower total costs of care are particularly challenging.

Objective: To investigate Medicaid costs and care outcomes associated with use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed Medicaid patients using and not using the services of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic (Frontier Psychiatry, Billings, Montana) in 2022. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2024.

Exposure: Receipt of care through an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic.

Main outcomes and measures: Differences in Medicaid costs and cost subtypes between telepsychiatry patients and controls were assessed. Quality metrics, including inpatient hospitalizations, hospital readmissions, and admissions from the emergency department, were also compared.

Results: In total, there were 2686 patients using the outpatient telepsychiatry clinic's services (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 30.55 [14.67] years) and 2686 propensity-matched controls (1665 female [62.0%]; mean [SD] age, 31.37 [15.92] years). Across categories examined, the telepsychiatry patients had care costs per member per month (PMPM) similar to those for propensity-matched control patients ($685.5 [95% CI, $632.9-$738.2] vs $734.0 [95% CI, $645.7-$822.3]; P = .10) over the study period. PMPM costs to Medicaid from the telepsychiatry clinic's patients were higher for professional services vs control patients ($464.0 [95% CI, $443.4-$484.5] vs $388.4 [95% CI, $368.1-$408.7]; P < .001) but were lower for inpatient hospitalization fees ($201.6 [95% CI, $146.2-$228.7] vs $260.6 [95% CI, $220.2-$341.5]; P = .04). Telepsychiatry clinic patients had a 38.0% lower mean annualized hospitalization rate per 1000 patients than controls (274.3 [95% CI, 237.1-311.6] hospitalizations per 1000 patients vs 442.6 [95% CI, 396.5-488.7] hospitalizations per 1000 patients; P < .001) and a 17.9% lower rate of admissions from the emergency department (patients vs controls, 299.7 admissions [47.7%] vs 519.0 admissions [58.1%]).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study of 5372 patients, use of an outpatient telepsychiatry clinic's services was associated with decreases in inpatient hospitalization rates and lower rates of admissions from the emergency department, with similar costs to Medicaid. These findings suggest that outpatient telepsychiatry care could play an important role in reducing hospital admissions among patients enrolled in Medicaid.

在门诊远程精神病学诊所治疗的患者的医疗补助费用和结果。
重要性:在精神病学中,由于指诊和及时护理而节省费用的证据仍然很少。为医疗补助患者提供循证精神病学治疗以降低护理总成本的干预措施尤其具有挑战性。目的:调查医疗补助费用和护理结果与使用门诊远程精神病学诊所的关系。设计、环境和参与者:这项横断面研究分析了2022年使用和不使用门诊远程精神病学诊所(蒙大拿比林斯前沿精神病学)服务的医疗补助患者。数据分析时间为2024年6月至9月。暴露:通过远程精神病学门诊接受治疗。主要结局和措施:评估远程精神病患者和对照组在医疗补助费用和费用亚型方面的差异。质量指标,包括住院、再入院和急诊科入院,也进行了比较。结果:使用远程精神科门诊服务的患者共2686例,其中女性1665例,占62.0%;平均[SD]年龄,30.55[14.67]岁)和2686例倾向匹配对照(女性1665例[62.0%];平均[SD]年龄,31.37[15.92]岁)。在检查的各个类别中,远程精神病患者的每月人均护理费用(PMPM)与倾向匹配的对照组患者相似(685.5美元[95% CI, 632.9美元- 738.2美元]vs 734.0美元[95% CI, 645.7美元- 822.3美元];P = .10)。远程精神科门诊患者的医疗补助PMPM费用比对照组患者高(464.0美元[95% CI, 443.4- 484.5美元]和388.4美元[95% CI, 368.1- 408.7美元];结论和相关性:在这项5372例患者的横断面研究中,使用门诊远程精神病学诊所的服务与住院率和急诊科入院率的降低有关,其成本与医疗补助相似。这些研究结果表明,门诊远程精神病学护理可以在减少医疗补助患者住院率方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信