The Standardized Prophylaxis and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients of Respiratory Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Study.
{"title":"The Standardized Prophylaxis and Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients of Respiratory Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Bin-Yan Fu, Sheng-Xin Fan, Jia-Zhou Liu, Yu-Liang Liu, Xiao-Hui Wang, Hong Chen","doi":"10.1177/10760296251334380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCritically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The standardized prophylaxis of VTE in these patients and the appropriate prevention protocols are not very clear.MethodWe enrolled 426 patients admitted to respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), all of them underwent Padua risk scoring and patients at high risk of VTE also underwent bleeding risk scoring. We compared the VTE prevention methods that followed the guidelines between two different bleeding risk groups and the VTE incidence of these two groups. We also analyzed the risk factors for VTE in RICU patients.ResultsIn patients admitted to RICU, the rate of overall VTE prophylaxis was 71.3% (295/414), but the rate of standardized prophylaxis of VTE was only 32.6% (135/414). The standardized prophylaxis rate of VTE in high-risk bleeding patients was 40.3%, much higher than the 22.2% in low-risk bleeding patients (<i>P </i>< 0.001). There was also a significant difference in the incidence of VTE between the two groups (26.9%vs3.4%, <i>P </i>< 0.001). 70 (16.9%) patients in RICU developed VTE, the multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that immobilization time, pulmonary encephalopathy, oral or inject corticosteroids, trauma or surgery within 3 months were independent risk factors of VTE in patients admitted to RICU, while pharmacological prophylaxis was a protective factor for VTE. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the above composite indicators had a higher predictive value for RICU patients with VTE, with a ROC area under the curve (AUC) of 0.925 (95%CI 0.894-0.956, <i>P </i>< 0.001).ConclusionAlthough the overall prophylaxis rate of VTE in patients admitted to RICU was high, the rate of standardized prevention was not ideal. Pharmacological prophylaxis may play an important role in preventing VTE in RICU patients and fruther studies are needed to explore the optimal thromboprophylaxis protocol for critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10335,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"31 ","pages":"10760296251334380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296251334380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundCritically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU) are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The standardized prophylaxis of VTE in these patients and the appropriate prevention protocols are not very clear.MethodWe enrolled 426 patients admitted to respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), all of them underwent Padua risk scoring and patients at high risk of VTE also underwent bleeding risk scoring. We compared the VTE prevention methods that followed the guidelines between two different bleeding risk groups and the VTE incidence of these two groups. We also analyzed the risk factors for VTE in RICU patients.ResultsIn patients admitted to RICU, the rate of overall VTE prophylaxis was 71.3% (295/414), but the rate of standardized prophylaxis of VTE was only 32.6% (135/414). The standardized prophylaxis rate of VTE in high-risk bleeding patients was 40.3%, much higher than the 22.2% in low-risk bleeding patients (P < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in the incidence of VTE between the two groups (26.9%vs3.4%, P < 0.001). 70 (16.9%) patients in RICU developed VTE, the multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that immobilization time, pulmonary encephalopathy, oral or inject corticosteroids, trauma or surgery within 3 months were independent risk factors of VTE in patients admitted to RICU, while pharmacological prophylaxis was a protective factor for VTE. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the above composite indicators had a higher predictive value for RICU patients with VTE, with a ROC area under the curve (AUC) of 0.925 (95%CI 0.894-0.956, P < 0.001).ConclusionAlthough the overall prophylaxis rate of VTE in patients admitted to RICU was high, the rate of standardized prevention was not ideal. Pharmacological prophylaxis may play an important role in preventing VTE in RICU patients and fruther studies are needed to explore the optimal thromboprophylaxis protocol for critically ill patients.
背景重症监护病房(ICU)危重患者是发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的高危人群。这些患者静脉血栓栓塞的标准化预防和适当的预防方案尚不清楚。方法入选呼吸重症监护病房(RICU) 426例患者,所有患者均进行Padua风险评分,静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)高危患者也进行出血风险评分。我们比较了两个不同出血风险组遵循指南的静脉血栓栓塞预防方法和两组静脉血栓栓塞发生率。我们还分析了RICU患者静脉血栓栓塞的危险因素。结果RICU患者VTE整体预防率为71.3%(295/414),而VTE标准化预防率仅为32.6%(135/414)。高危出血患者静脉血栓栓塞标准化预防率为40.3%,远高于低危出血患者的22.2% (P P P
期刊介绍:
CATH is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal that addresses the practical clinical and laboratory issues involved in managing bleeding and clotting disorders, especially those related to thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular disorders. CATH covers clinical trials, studies on etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of thrombohemorrhagic disorders.