Efficacy of De-Escalation to Cefmetazole in Patients with Bacteremic Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Takaya Namiki, Yuta Yokoyama, Motonori Kimura, Shogo Fukuda, Shoji Seyama, Osamu Iketani, Yoshifumi Uwamino, Aya Jibiki, Hitoshi Kawazoe, Hisakazu Ohtani, Naoki Hasegawa, Kazuaki Matsumoto, Rentaro Oda, Hideki Hashi, Sayo Suzuki, Tomonori Nakamura
{"title":"Efficacy of De-Escalation to Cefmetazole in Patients with Bacteremic Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli.","authors":"Takaya Namiki, Yuta Yokoyama, Motonori Kimura, Shogo Fukuda, Shoji Seyama, Osamu Iketani, Yoshifumi Uwamino, Aya Jibiki, Hitoshi Kawazoe, Hisakazu Ohtani, Naoki Hasegawa, Kazuaki Matsumoto, Rentaro Oda, Hideki Hashi, Sayo Suzuki, Tomonori Nakamura","doi":"10.1248/bpb.b24-00834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to clarify the optimal value for the unbound cefmetazole concentration to remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT ≥ MIC) for efficacy of de-escalation to cefmetazole in patients with bacteremic urinary tract infection by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. This double-center retrospective observational study was conducted at Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center and Keio University Hospital from January 2012 to October 2022. Efficacy was determined via clinical evaluation (mortality rate, recurrence rate, vital changes) and bacteriological evaluation, and the optimal fT ≥ MIC was calculated via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. As a result, the number of patients evaluated were 40 (35 and 5 in the treatment success and treatment failure groups, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that fT ≥ MIC, recurrence rate, and MIC for cefmetazole against bacteria were significantly different for the two groups (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal fT ≥ MIC indicating efficacy was 57% (area under the curve: 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.00, p = 0.002). All patients with fT ≥ MIC ≥ 57% had successful treatment, whereas the frequency of treatment failure was high among those with fT ≥ MIC <57%. The optimal fT ≥ MIC for the clinical efficacy of de-escalation to cefmetazole in patients with bacteremic urinary tract infection by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli was fT ≥ MIC ≥ 57%. This finding would be useful for optimal dosing of cefmetazole.</p>","PeriodicalId":8955,"journal":{"name":"Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin","volume":"48 5","pages":"537-544"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.b24-00834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the optimal value for the unbound cefmetazole concentration to remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fT ≥ MIC) for efficacy of de-escalation to cefmetazole in patients with bacteremic urinary tract infection by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. This double-center retrospective observational study was conducted at Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center and Keio University Hospital from January 2012 to October 2022. Efficacy was determined via clinical evaluation (mortality rate, recurrence rate, vital changes) and bacteriological evaluation, and the optimal fT ≥ MIC was calculated via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. As a result, the number of patients evaluated were 40 (35 and 5 in the treatment success and treatment failure groups, respectively). Univariate analysis showed that fT ≥ MIC, recurrence rate, and MIC for cefmetazole against bacteria were significantly different for the two groups (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal fT ≥ MIC indicating efficacy was 57% (area under the curve: 0.94, 95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.00, p = 0.002). All patients with fT ≥ MIC ≥ 57% had successful treatment, whereas the frequency of treatment failure was high among those with fT ≥ MIC <57%. The optimal fT ≥ MIC for the clinical efficacy of de-escalation to cefmetazole in patients with bacteremic urinary tract infection by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing E. coli was fT ≥ MIC ≥ 57%. This finding would be useful for optimal dosing of cefmetazole.

头孢美唑降压治疗广谱产β-内酰胺酶大肠杆菌所致菌血症性尿路感染的疗效。
本研究旨在明确对产β-内酰胺酶广谱大肠杆菌致菌性尿路感染患者头孢美唑降压治疗的最佳值,即未结合头孢美唑浓度保持在最低抑制浓度(MIC)以上(fT≥MIC)。这项双中心回顾性观察研究于2012年1月至2022年10月在东京湾浦安市川医疗中心和庆应义塾大学医院进行。通过临床评价(死亡率、复发率、生命变化)和细菌学评价确定疗效,通过受试者工作特征曲线分析计算最佳fT≥MIC。结果,评估患者数量为40例(治疗成功组35例,治疗失败组5例)。单因素分析显示,两组患者fT≥MIC、复发率、头孢美唑抗菌MIC差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,最佳fT≥MIC指示疗效为57%(曲线下面积为0.94,95%可信区间为0.86 ~ 1.00,p = 0.002)。fT≥MIC≥57%的患者均治疗成功,而fT≥MIC的患者治疗失败的频率较高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (Biol. Pharm. Bull.) began publication in 1978 as the Journal of Pharmacobio-Dynamics. It covers various biological topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences. A fourth Society journal, the Journal of Health Science, was merged with Biol. Pharm. Bull. in 2012. The main aim of the Society’s journals is to advance the pharmaceutical sciences with research reports, information exchange, and high-quality discussion. The average review time for articles submitted to the journals is around one month for first decision. The complete texts of all of the Society’s journals can be freely accessed through J-STAGE. The Society’s editorial committee hopes that the content of its journals will be useful to your research, and also invites you to submit your own work to the journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信