Barriers and motivators associated with COVID-19 vaccination-a vaccine acceptance scoring system based on a population survey in southern Sweden.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Adam Mitchell, Mariam Hassan, Fredrik Kahn, Yana Litins'ka, Matilda Almgren, Ulf Malmqvist, Per-Olof Östergren, Malin Inghammar, Jonas Björk, Louise Bennet
{"title":"Barriers and motivators associated with COVID-19 vaccination-a vaccine acceptance scoring system based on a population survey in southern Sweden.","authors":"Adam Mitchell, Mariam Hassan, Fredrik Kahn, Yana Litins'ka, Matilda Almgren, Ulf Malmqvist, Per-Olof Östergren, Malin Inghammar, Jonas Björk, Louise Bennet","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Low vaccination coverage against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a public health concern. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and motivators associated with COVID-19 vaccination and develop a vaccine acceptance scoring system. From the overall population residing in Skåne county Sweden in 2022 (n = 1 384 531), 3600 randomly selected individuals (aged ≥18 years) received a survey. Questions were grouped into six domains reflecting trust in vaccines and institutions, benefit-risk balance, injunctive and descriptive norms and accessibility. Responses were scored as either assenting (1 p) or dissenting (0 p) in relation to its domain. A score between 1 and 5 p was constructed for each domain and a total vaccine acceptance score was analysed. Internal consistency overall and within domains was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Associations with vaccination status and vaccine acceptance scores in relation to domains were modelled with logistic regression. 820 responses were received, 646 vaccinated (response rate 36%), and 174 unvaccinated (response rate 10%), with relatively high internal consistency overall (α = 0.76). Domains markedly associated with vaccination were injunctive norms OR 5.06 (95% CI 3.27, 7.83), descriptive norms OR 2.64 (1.63, 4.30) and trust in vaccines OR 1.66 (1.15, 2.40). Vaccine acceptance was measured with sufficient reliability in a Swedish population. Norms, in this context, general perceptions of acceptable/unacceptable behaviours and notion on actual performed behaviours, were together with trust in vaccines most strongly associated with vaccination. Future pandemic responses should consider these aspects in communication strategies and targeted interventions to increase and equalize vaccination uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low vaccination coverage against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a public health concern. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and motivators associated with COVID-19 vaccination and develop a vaccine acceptance scoring system. From the overall population residing in Skåne county Sweden in 2022 (n = 1 384 531), 3600 randomly selected individuals (aged ≥18 years) received a survey. Questions were grouped into six domains reflecting trust in vaccines and institutions, benefit-risk balance, injunctive and descriptive norms and accessibility. Responses were scored as either assenting (1 p) or dissenting (0 p) in relation to its domain. A score between 1 and 5 p was constructed for each domain and a total vaccine acceptance score was analysed. Internal consistency overall and within domains was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Associations with vaccination status and vaccine acceptance scores in relation to domains were modelled with logistic regression. 820 responses were received, 646 vaccinated (response rate 36%), and 174 unvaccinated (response rate 10%), with relatively high internal consistency overall (α = 0.76). Domains markedly associated with vaccination were injunctive norms OR 5.06 (95% CI 3.27, 7.83), descriptive norms OR 2.64 (1.63, 4.30) and trust in vaccines OR 1.66 (1.15, 2.40). Vaccine acceptance was measured with sufficient reliability in a Swedish population. Norms, in this context, general perceptions of acceptable/unacceptable behaviours and notion on actual performed behaviours, were together with trust in vaccines most strongly associated with vaccination. Future pandemic responses should consider these aspects in communication strategies and targeted interventions to increase and equalize vaccination uptake.

与COVID-19疫苗接种相关的障碍和激励因素——基于瑞典南部人口调查的疫苗接受度评分系统
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)疫苗接种覆盖率低是一个公共卫生问题。本研究的目的是确定与COVID-19疫苗接种相关的障碍和激励因素,并开发疫苗接受度评分系统。从2022年居住在瑞典sk内县的总人口中(n = 1 384 531),随机选择3600名年龄≥18岁的个体接受了调查。问题被分为六个领域,反映了对疫苗和机构的信任、利益-风险平衡、禁令和描述性规范以及可及性。回答得分为同意(1分)或反对(0分)。对每个结构域进行1 ~ 5p的评分,并对总疫苗接受评分进行分析。整体内部一致性和域内一致性用Cronbach's alpha进行评估。与疫苗接种状态和疫苗接受分数相关的领域的关联用逻辑回归建模。共收到应答820份,接种疫苗646份(应答率36%),未接种疫苗174份(应答率10%),总体内部一致性较高(α = 0.76)。与疫苗接种显著相关的领域是禁令规范OR 5.06 (95% CI 3.27, 7.83)、描述性规范OR 2.64(1.63, 4.30)和对疫苗的信任OR 1.66(1.15, 2.40)。在瑞典人群中对疫苗接受度进行了足够可靠的测量。在这方面,规范、对可接受/不可接受行为的一般看法以及对实际行为的概念,与对疫苗的信任一起,与疫苗接种密切相关。未来的大流行应对应在传播战略和有针对性的干预措施中考虑这些方面,以增加和平衡疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信