A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery guideline update on the management of intermittent claudication.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Samer Saadi, Tarek Nayfeh, Rami Rajjoub, Bashar Hasan, Mohammed Firwana, Tabinda Jawaid, Walid Hazem, Sahrish Shah, Yahya Alsawaf, Mohamed O Seisa, Larry J Prokop, Michael S Conte, M Hassan Murad
{"title":"A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery guideline update on the management of intermittent claudication.","authors":"Samer Saadi, Tarek Nayfeh, Rami Rajjoub, Bashar Hasan, Mohammed Firwana, Tabinda Jawaid, Walid Hazem, Sahrish Shah, Yahya Alsawaf, Mohamed O Seisa, Larry J Prokop, Michael S Conte, M Hassan Murad","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the current evidence on the management of intermittent claudication (IC), a prevalent manifestation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. We addressed six questions developed by a guideline committee from the Society for Vascular Surgery, addressing pharmacological treatments, exercise regimens, endovascular interventions, and predictors of major adverse cardiovascular, limb-related events, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in 5333 citations, from which we included 73 studies (46 randomized trials). In patients with PAD and IC who had one or more high-risk comorbidities, low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin were associated with lower risk of major adverse limb events and major adverse cardiovascular events than aspirin alone. In patients who have undergone surgical or endovascular interventions for PAD, the addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin may improve limb outcomes. Of note, rivaroxaban trials excluded patients at high risk of bleeding. Single antiplatelet agents showed no significant efficacy differences head-to-head in ambulatory patients with IC and had a lower bleeding risk compared with combination therapy or anticoagulation. Home exercise programs were feasible and may be an alternative to supervised exercise in ambulatory patients with IC and in those who had revascularization. Several comorbidities increased the risk of adverse outcomes after revascularization for IC, such as advanced age, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous interventions, congestive heart failure, infrapopliteal artery involvement, and longer lesion lengths. In patients with IC undergoing endovascular intervention for superficial femoral artery disease, plain balloon angioplasty was associated with worse outcomes than drug elution or stent implantation for intermediate or longer lesions (ie, >5 cm).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review summarizes the current evidence base for the management of IC, offering insights into the relative benefits and risks of various therapeutic strategies. The findings underscore the need for individualized patient care, considering both the potential benefits and risks associated with different interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the current evidence on the management of intermittent claudication (IC), a prevalent manifestation of peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

Methods: We conducted comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. We addressed six questions developed by a guideline committee from the Society for Vascular Surgery, addressing pharmacological treatments, exercise regimens, endovascular interventions, and predictors of major adverse cardiovascular, limb-related events, and mortality.

Results: The search resulted in 5333 citations, from which we included 73 studies (46 randomized trials). In patients with PAD and IC who had one or more high-risk comorbidities, low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin were associated with lower risk of major adverse limb events and major adverse cardiovascular events than aspirin alone. In patients who have undergone surgical or endovascular interventions for PAD, the addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin may improve limb outcomes. Of note, rivaroxaban trials excluded patients at high risk of bleeding. Single antiplatelet agents showed no significant efficacy differences head-to-head in ambulatory patients with IC and had a lower bleeding risk compared with combination therapy or anticoagulation. Home exercise programs were feasible and may be an alternative to supervised exercise in ambulatory patients with IC and in those who had revascularization. Several comorbidities increased the risk of adverse outcomes after revascularization for IC, such as advanced age, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous interventions, congestive heart failure, infrapopliteal artery involvement, and longer lesion lengths. In patients with IC undergoing endovascular intervention for superficial femoral artery disease, plain balloon angioplasty was associated with worse outcomes than drug elution or stent implantation for intermediate or longer lesions (ie, >5 cm).

Conclusions: This systematic review summarizes the current evidence base for the management of IC, offering insights into the relative benefits and risks of various therapeutic strategies. The findings underscore the need for individualized patient care, considering both the potential benefits and risks associated with different interventions.

支持血管外科学会关于间歇性跛行管理指南更新的系统综述。
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了目前有关间歇性跛行(IC)治疗的证据,这是外周动脉疾病(PAD)的一种普遍表现,及其对患者预后的影响。方法:综合检索MEDLINE(R)、EMBASE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Scopus。我们解决了由血管外科学会指导委员会提出的六个问题,包括药物治疗、运动方案、血管内干预、主要不良心血管、肢体相关事件和死亡率的预测因素。结果:检索结果为5333次引用,其中包括73项研究(46项随机试验)。在伴有一种或多种高风险合并症的PAD和IC患者中,低剂量利伐沙班和阿司匹林与男性和MACE的风险较低相关。对于接受手术或血管内介入治疗PAD的患者,在阿司匹林中加入低剂量利伐沙班可能改善肢体预后。值得注意的是,利伐沙班试验排除了高危出血患者。单一抗血小板药物(SAPT)在门诊IC患者中没有显着的疗效差异,与联合治疗或抗凝相比,出血风险更低。家庭锻炼计划是可行的,并且可能是对流动IC患者和那些有血运重建术的患者进行监督锻炼的替代方案。高龄、糖尿病、冠状动脉疾病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、既往干预、充血性心力衰竭、腘下动脉受累和较长的病变长度等合并症增加了IC患者血运重建术后不良结局的风险。在接受股浅动脉病变血管内介入治疗的IC患者中,对于中间或较长的病变(即bbb50 cm),普通球囊血管成形术优于药物洗脱或支架植入术。结论:本系统综述为IC的管理提供了证据基础,提供了各种治疗策略的相对获益和风险的见解。研究结果强调了个性化患者护理的必要性,同时考虑到不同干预措施的潜在益处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信