Effect of mesh fixation in incisional hernia repair using the open sublay technique: results from the herniamed-registry.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
P Schelbert, R N Vuille-Dit-Bille, F Köckerling, D Adolf, R F Staerkle
{"title":"Effect of mesh fixation in incisional hernia repair using the open sublay technique: results from the herniamed-registry.","authors":"P Schelbert, R N Vuille-Dit-Bille, F Köckerling, D Adolf, R F Staerkle","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03714-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Incisional hernias reflect a common complication after abdominal surgery. Main treatment consists of defect closure and mesh insertion using the sublay method. The aim of the present study was to assess the association of mesh fixation to patients' outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Herniamed registry, data from 13'452 incisional hernia repairs were analyzed retrospectively. Three groups of patients were compared: those with mesh fixation (n = 9'986), those with self-fixing meshes (n = 2'725), and those without mesh fixation (n = 741). Postoperative complications, recurrence and postoperative pain scores were assessed over a follow-up period of one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Taking into account that patients without mesh fixation had smaller defects and were treated with smaller meshes indicating non-equivalent groups, postoperative complications (general, intra- and postoperative complications, as well as complication-related reoperations), were similar among groups except that self-fixing meshes showed a lower general complication rate compared to fixed meshes (OR = 0.733 [0.579; 0.929]; p = 0.010). Mesh fixation had no relation to recurrence rate. Self-fixating meshes were associated with increased pain at rest rate (OR = 1.325 [1.156; 1.518]; p < 0.001), pain on exertion rate (OR = 1.255 [1.125; 1.400], p < 0.001) and chronic pain requiring treatment (OR = 1.271 [1.086; 1.488], p = 0.003) compared to fixed meshes. Self-fixating (OR = 1.675 [1.322; 2.120], p < 0.001) and fixed meshes (OR = 1.334 [1.069; 1.666], p = 0.011) were associated to increased pain on exertion rate compared to non-fixed meshes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It appears that mesh fixation can be omitted during sublay incisional hernia repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018522/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03714-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Incisional hernias reflect a common complication after abdominal surgery. Main treatment consists of defect closure and mesh insertion using the sublay method. The aim of the present study was to assess the association of mesh fixation to patients' outcome.

Methods: Using the Herniamed registry, data from 13'452 incisional hernia repairs were analyzed retrospectively. Three groups of patients were compared: those with mesh fixation (n = 9'986), those with self-fixing meshes (n = 2'725), and those without mesh fixation (n = 741). Postoperative complications, recurrence and postoperative pain scores were assessed over a follow-up period of one year postoperatively.

Results: Taking into account that patients without mesh fixation had smaller defects and were treated with smaller meshes indicating non-equivalent groups, postoperative complications (general, intra- and postoperative complications, as well as complication-related reoperations), were similar among groups except that self-fixing meshes showed a lower general complication rate compared to fixed meshes (OR = 0.733 [0.579; 0.929]; p = 0.010). Mesh fixation had no relation to recurrence rate. Self-fixating meshes were associated with increased pain at rest rate (OR = 1.325 [1.156; 1.518]; p < 0.001), pain on exertion rate (OR = 1.255 [1.125; 1.400], p < 0.001) and chronic pain requiring treatment (OR = 1.271 [1.086; 1.488], p = 0.003) compared to fixed meshes. Self-fixating (OR = 1.675 [1.322; 2.120], p < 0.001) and fixed meshes (OR = 1.334 [1.069; 1.666], p = 0.011) were associated to increased pain on exertion rate compared to non-fixed meshes.

Conclusion: It appears that mesh fixation can be omitted during sublay incisional hernia repair.

网状物固定在切开疝修补术中的效果:来自疝登记的结果。
目的:切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症。主要的治疗方法是闭合缺陷和插入补片。本研究的目的是评估补片固定与患者预后的关系。方法:采用Herniamed注册表,回顾性分析13452例切口疝修补的资料。比较三组患者:使用补片固定组(n = 9′986)、使用自固定补片(n = 2′725)和不使用补片固定组(n = 741)。术后随访1年,评估术后并发症、复发和术后疼痛评分。结果:考虑到无补片固定的患者缺陷更小,用更小的补片治疗,表明非等效组,术后并发症(一般、内、术后并发症以及并发症相关的再手术)各组间相似,但自固定补片的一般并发症发生率低于固定补片(OR = 0.733 [0.579;0.929);p = 0.010)。补片固定与复发率无关。自固定补片与静息疼痛增加相关(OR = 1.325 [1.156;1.518);结论:下切口疝修补术中可以省略补片固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信