Outcomes of Patients With Extramedullary Disease in Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma From the Pooled LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Philippe Moreau, María-Victoria Mateos, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Maria Esther Gonzalez Garcia, Britta Besemer, Marta Sonia Gonzalez Perez, Mohamad Mohty, Joanne Lindsey-Hill, Suriya Kirkpatrick, Michel Delforge, Emanuele Angelucci, Francesco Di Raimondo, Ravi Vij, Margaret Doyle, Kathleen Gray, Claire Albrecht, Vadim Strulev, Imène Haddad, Silva Koskinen, Lorenzo Acciarri, Jozefien Buyze, Katja Weisel
{"title":"Outcomes of Patients With Extramedullary Disease in Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma From the Pooled LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies.","authors":"Philippe Moreau, María-Victoria Mateos, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Maria Esther Gonzalez Garcia, Britta Besemer, Marta Sonia Gonzalez Perez, Mohamad Mohty, Joanne Lindsey-Hill, Suriya Kirkpatrick, Michel Delforge, Emanuele Angelucci, Francesco Di Raimondo, Ravi Vij, Margaret Doyle, Kathleen Gray, Claire Albrecht, Vadim Strulev, Imène Haddad, Silva Koskinen, Lorenzo Acciarri, Jozefien Buyze, Katja Weisel","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who develop extramedullary disease (EMD) generally have a poor prognosis, highlighting the urgent need for new therapies. We report effectiveness outcomes and safety in patients with and without EMD from the pooled analysis of LocoMMotion and MoMMent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LocoMMotion and MoMMent-1 are prospective, noninterventional, consecutive studies assessing the evolving standard of care from 20192022 in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 302 patients, 29 had EMD per investigator discretion and only 15 patients were assessed as having true extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP; defined as patients with ≥1 EMP lesion) by the response review committee. The 29 EMD patients received 21 unique regimens (most commonly chemotherapy-based regimens). Of the 29 patients with EMD, overall response rate (ORR) was 24.1%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.66 months, median overall survival (OS) was 7.16 months, and median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 3.09 months. All responses were lower (ORR) and shorter (median PFS, OS, and TTNT) in patients with EMD vs patients without EMD. Nineteen (65.5%) patients with EMD received ≥1 subsequent lines of therapy. Of those, two (10.5%) patients received bispecific antibodies and achieved a partial response or better; three (15.8%) patients received antibody-drug conjugates (responses were unknown or not determined at data cut-off), and no patients received chimeric antigen receptorT cell therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate the urgent need for more effective novel therapies for patients with EMD and highlight the need to use clear definitions of EMD and EMD response criteria for clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who develop extramedullary disease (EMD) generally have a poor prognosis, highlighting the urgent need for new therapies. We report effectiveness outcomes and safety in patients with and without EMD from the pooled analysis of LocoMMotion and MoMMent.

Methods: LocoMMotion and MoMMent-1 are prospective, noninterventional, consecutive studies assessing the evolving standard of care from 20192022 in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM.

Results: Of 302 patients, 29 had EMD per investigator discretion and only 15 patients were assessed as having true extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP; defined as patients with ≥1 EMP lesion) by the response review committee. The 29 EMD patients received 21 unique regimens (most commonly chemotherapy-based regimens). Of the 29 patients with EMD, overall response rate (ORR) was 24.1%, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.66 months, median overall survival (OS) was 7.16 months, and median time to next treatment (TTNT) was 3.09 months. All responses were lower (ORR) and shorter (median PFS, OS, and TTNT) in patients with EMD vs patients without EMD. Nineteen (65.5%) patients with EMD received ≥1 subsequent lines of therapy. Of those, two (10.5%) patients received bispecific antibodies and achieved a partial response or better; three (15.8%) patients received antibody-drug conjugates (responses were unknown or not determined at data cut-off), and no patients received chimeric antigen receptorT cell therapy.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate the urgent need for more effective novel therapies for patients with EMD and highlight the need to use clear definitions of EMD and EMD response criteria for clinical trials.

来自联合运动和运动研究的三级暴露复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤髓外疾病患者的结局
背景:复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)患者发展为髓外疾病(EMD)通常预后较差,迫切需要新的治疗方法。我们从LocoMMotion和MoMMent的汇总分析中报告了EMD患者和非EMD患者的有效性、结局和安全性。方法:LocoMMotion和moment -1是前瞻性、非干预性、连续研究,评估从2019年至2022年三级暴露性RRMM患者不断变化的护理标准。结果:在302名患者中,29名患者有EMD,只有15名患者被评估为真正的髓外浆细胞瘤(EMP;由反应审查委员会定义为≥1个EMP病变的患者。29例EMD患者接受了21种独特的方案(最常见的是基于化疗的方案)。在29例EMD患者中,总缓解率(ORR)为24.1%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为2.66个月,中位总生存期(OS)为7.16个月,中位下一次治疗时间(TTNT)为3.09个月。与没有EMD的患者相比,EMD患者的所有反应都更低(ORR),更短(中位PFS、OS和TTNT)。19例(65.5%)EMD患者接受了≥1次后续治疗。其中,2例(10.5%)患者接受了双特异性抗体并获得了部分或更好的反应;3例(15.8%)患者接受了抗体-药物偶联治疗(在数据截止时反应未知或未确定),没有患者接受了嵌合抗原受体细胞治疗。结论:这些结果表明迫切需要对EMD患者进行更有效的新疗法,并强调需要在临床试验中使用明确的EMD定义和EMD反应标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1606
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信