Competence, mattering and belonging: An evidence-based and practical approach to understanding and fostering medical student professional identity formation.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jennifer L Quaintance, Thuy L Ngo, Marjorie D Wenrich, David Hatem, Meg G Keeley, Jessica M Lewis, Brian E Mavis, Silvia L Olivares, Robert B Shochet, Maya G Sardesai
{"title":"Competence, mattering and belonging: An evidence-based and practical approach to understanding and fostering medical student professional identity formation.","authors":"Jennifer L Quaintance, Thuy L Ngo, Marjorie D Wenrich, David Hatem, Meg G Keeley, Jessica M Lewis, Brian E Mavis, Silvia L Olivares, Robert B Shochet, Maya G Sardesai","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2500568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Understanding professional identity formation (PIF) in medical education is essential for preparing future physicians to navigate their profession and integrate communities' of practice (CoP) values, norms, and expertise to meet patients' needs. Despite robust PIF literature, gaps persist due to greater focus on internal psychological processes than social-contextual influences. Empirically describing PIF within medical training's cultural context will enhance understanding and inform learning environment interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a constructivist qualitative approach to examine social-contextual factors influencing students' PIF. In one-on-one interviews, 52 graduating students from 4 geographically diverse U.S. medical schools described their PIF from pre-medical school through graduation. We used an iterative, multi-stage, constant-comparison approach to data analysis, employing reflexive methods throughout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Social-contextual cues defining PIF were identified in three domains: competence, mattering, belonging. As students received cues, their professional identity evolved. They described a gradual integration of personal and professional values, with growing confidence and a shifting position within the physician CoP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a conceptual framework that describes how CoP members' interactions with medical students positively influence and at times undermine students' sense of competence, belonging, and mattering. Understanding these cues can help educators create a supportive environment that enhances students' PIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2500568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding professional identity formation (PIF) in medical education is essential for preparing future physicians to navigate their profession and integrate communities' of practice (CoP) values, norms, and expertise to meet patients' needs. Despite robust PIF literature, gaps persist due to greater focus on internal psychological processes than social-contextual influences. Empirically describing PIF within medical training's cultural context will enhance understanding and inform learning environment interventions.

Methods: We employed a constructivist qualitative approach to examine social-contextual factors influencing students' PIF. In one-on-one interviews, 52 graduating students from 4 geographically diverse U.S. medical schools described their PIF from pre-medical school through graduation. We used an iterative, multi-stage, constant-comparison approach to data analysis, employing reflexive methods throughout.

Results: Social-contextual cues defining PIF were identified in three domains: competence, mattering, belonging. As students received cues, their professional identity evolved. They described a gradual integration of personal and professional values, with growing confidence and a shifting position within the physician CoP.

Conclusions: This study provides a conceptual framework that describes how CoP members' interactions with medical students positively influence and at times undermine students' sense of competence, belonging, and mattering. Understanding these cues can help educators create a supportive environment that enhances students' PIF.

能力、重要性和归属感:理解和培养医学生职业认同形成的循证实用方法。
简介:了解医学教育中的职业认同形成(PIF)对于准备未来的医生驾驭他们的专业和整合社区实践(CoP)的价值观、规范和专业知识以满足患者的需求至关重要。尽管有大量的PIF文献,但由于更多地关注内部心理过程而不是社会背景影响,差距仍然存在。在医学培训的文化背景下对PIF进行实证描述将增强理解并为学习环境干预提供信息。方法:采用建构主义定性研究方法,探讨影响学生PIF的社会情境因素。在一对一的访谈中,来自4所地理位置不同的美国医学院的52名毕业生描述了他们从医学院预科到毕业的PIF。我们采用迭代、多阶段、不断比较的方法进行数据分析,并自始至终采用反身性方法。结果:定义PIF的社会语境线索在三个领域被确定:能力、重要性和归属感。随着学生们得到提示,他们的职业身份也随之演变。他们描述了个人和职业价值观的逐渐整合,信心的增长和医师CoP中的地位的转变。结论:本研究提供了一个概念框架,描述CoP成员与医学生的互动如何积极影响(有时会破坏)学生的能力感、归属感和重要性。了解这些线索可以帮助教育工作者创造一个支持性的环境,提高学生的PIF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信